Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Operator Theoretic Quantum Fault Tolerance

Gerald N. Gilbert, Yaakov S. Weinstein, Vaneet Aggarwal, A.R. Calderbank

Published Mar 19, 2009• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

General theory of quantum error correction and fault tolerance

Andrew M. Steane

Springer eBooks•Jun 1, 2001•4 citations

Operator Quantum Fault Tolerance

Gerald N. Gilbert, Michael Hamrick, Yaakov S. Weinstein +2 more

We introduce a universal operator theoretic framework for quantum fault tolerance that incorporates a top-down approach based on specification of the full system dynamics. This approach leads to more accurate error thresholds.

International Conference on Quantum Information•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

Fault-tolerant quantum error correction

Ivan B. Djordjević

Elsevier eBooks•Dec 5, 2025•0 citations

A Universal Operator Theoretic Framework for Quantum Fault Tolerance

Gerald N. Gilbert, Yaakov S. Weinstein, Alexander I. Lvovsky

We extend standard fault tolerance theory and Kitaev’s model for quantum computation so as to enable quantitative determination of design parameters for quantum computers that ensure that the overall computation yields a correct final result with some prescribed probability, as opposed to merely ensuring that the desired final quantum state is obtained. Our extension allows us to explicitly calculate the number of levels of error correction concatenation needed to achieve a correct final result with some prescribed success probability and demonstrate a clear connection between error correction and fault tolerance.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2009•2 citations

A Review of Variational Quantum Algorithms: Insights into Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing

Zhirao Wang, Junxiang Huang, Runyu Ye +8 more

Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) have established themselves as a central computational paradigm in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era. By coupling parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) with classical optimization, they operate effectively under strict hardware limitations. However, as quantum architectures transition toward early fault-tolerant (EFT) and ultimate fault-tolerant (FT) regimes, the foundational principles and long-term viability of VQAs require systematic reassessment. This review offers an insightful analysis of VQAs and their progression toward the fault-tolerant regime. We deconstruct the core algorithmic framework by examining ansatz design and classical optimization strategies, including cost function formulation, gradient computation, and optimizer selection. Concurrently, we evaluate critical training bottlenecks, notably barren plateaus (BPs), alongside established mitigation strategies. The discussion then explores the EFT phase, detailing how the integration of quantum error mitigation and partial error correction can sustain algorithmic performance. Addressing the FT phase, we analyze the inherent challenges confronting current hybrid VQA models. Furthermore, we synthesize recent VQA applications across diverse domains, including many-body physics, quantum chemistry, machine learning, and mathematical optimization. Ultimately, this review outlines a theoretical roadmap for adapting quantum algorithms to future hardware generations, elucidating how variational principles can be systematically refined to maintain their relevance and efficiency within an error-corrected computational environment.

quant-pharXiv:2604.07909•Apr 10, 2026•0 citations

Fault-tolerant quantum error correction

Ivan B. Djordjević

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations
We extend standard fault tolerance theory and Kitaev’s model for quantum computation so as to enable quantitative determination of design parameters for quantum computers that ensure that the overall computation yields a correct final result with some prescribed probability, as opposed to merely ensuring that the desired final quantum state is obtained. Our extension allows us to explicitly calculate the number of levels of error correction concatenation needed to achieve a correct final result with some prescribed success probability and demonstrate a clear connection between error correction and fault tolerance.
Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) have established themselves as a central computational paradigm in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era. By coupling parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) with classical optimization, they operate effectively under strict hardware limitations. However, as quantum architectures transition toward early fault-tolerant (EFT) and ultimate fault-tolerant (FT) regimes, the foundational principles and long-term viability of VQAs require systematic reassessment. This review offers an insightful analysis of VQAs and their progression toward the fault-tolerant regime. We deconstruct the core algorithmic framework by examining ansatz design and classical optimization strategies, including cost function formulation, gradient computation, and optimizer selection. Concurrently, we evaluate critical training bottlenecks, notably barren plateaus (BPs), alongside established mitigation strategies. The discussion then explores the EFT phase, detailing how the integration of quantum error mitigation and partial error correction can sustain algorithmic performance. Addressing the FT phase, we analyze the inherent challenges confronting current hybrid VQA models. Furthermore, we synthesize recent VQA applications across diverse domains, including many-body physics, quantum chemistry, machine learning, and mathematical optimization. Ultimately, this review outlines a theoretical roadmap for adapting quantum algorithms to future hardware generations, elucidating how variational principles can be systematically refined to maintain their relevance and efficiency within an error-corrected computational environment.