Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

On Noise-Tolerant Learning of Sparse Parities and Related Problems

Elena Grigorescu, Lev Reyzin, Santosh Vempala

Published Jan 1, 2011• 20 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-24412-4_32

Related papers

An improved algorithm for learning sparse parities in the presence of noise

Di Yan, Yu Yu, Hanlin Liu +2 more

Theoretical Computer Science•Apr 30, 2021•1 citation

Solving the Learning Parity with Noise Problem Using Quantum Algorithms

Bénédikt Tran, Serge Vaudenay B

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Feature learning via mean-field Langevin dynamics: classifying sparse parities and beyond

Taiji Suzuki, Denny C.-Y. Wu, Kazusato Oko +1 more

neural information processing systems•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Finding Correlations in Subquadratic Time, with Applications to Learning Parities and Juntas

Gregory J. Valiant

Given a set of n d-dimensional Boolean vectors with the promise that the vectors are chosen uniformly at random with the exception of two vectors that have Pearson-correlation ρ (Hamming distance d · 1-ρ/2), how quickly can one find the two correlated vectors? We present an algorithm which, for any constants ε, ρ >; 0 and d >;>; logn/ρ2, finds the correlated pair with high probability, and runs in time O(n 3ω/4 + ϵ)1.8), where w2-O(ρ)), given by Paturi et al. [15], Locality Sensitive Hashing (LSH) [11] and the Bucketing Codes approach [6]. Applications and extensions of this basic algorithm yield improved algorithms for several other problems: ApproximateClosest Pair: For any sufficiently small constant ϵ >; 0, given n vectors in Rd, our algorithm returns a pair of vectors whose Euclidean distance differs from that of the closest pair by a factor of at most 1+ϵ, and runs in time O(n2-Θ(√ϵ)). The best previous algorithms (including LSH) have runtime O(n2-O(ϵ)). Learning Sparse Parity with Noise: Given samples from an instance of the learning parity with noise problem where each example has length n, the true parity set has size at most kkpoly(1/1-2η)0.8kpoly(1/1-2η). This is the first algorithm with no depenJence on η in the exponent of n, aside from the trivial brute-force algorithm. Learning k-Juntas with Noise: Given uniformly random length n Boolean vectors, together with a label, which is some function of just kkpoly(1/1-2η)0.8kpoly(1/1-2η), 2 which improves on the previous best of >; nk(1-2/2k)poly( 1/1-2η ), from [8]. Learning k-Juntas without Noise:1 Our results for learning sparse parities with noise imply an algorithm for learning juntas without noise with runtime n ω+ϵ/4kpoly(n)0.6kpoly(n), which improves on the runtime n ω+1/ω poly(n) ≈ n0.7kpoly(n) of Mossel n et al. [13].

Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Oct 1, 2012•68 citations

On the Hardness of PAC-learning Stabilizer States with Noise

Aravind Gollakota, Daniel Liang

We consider the problem of learning stabilizer states with noise in the Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) framework of Aaronson (2007) for learning quantum states. In the noiseless setting, an algorithm for this problem was recently given by Rocchetto (2018), but the noisy case was left open. Motivated by approaches to noise tolerance from classical learning theory, we introduce the Statistical Query (SQ) model for PAC-learning quantum states, and prove that algorithms in this model are indeed resilient to common forms of noise, including classification and depolarizing noise. We prove an exponential lower bound on learning stabilizer states in the SQ model. Even outside the SQ model, we prove that learning stabilizer states with noise is in general as hard as Learning Parity with Noise (LPN) using classical examples. Our results position the problem of learning stabilizer states as a natural quantum analogue of the classical problem of learning parities: easy in the noiseless setting, but seemingly intractable even with simple forms of noise.

arXiv:2102.05174•Quantum•Feb 2, 2022•12 citations

Improved Learning of k-Parities

Arnab Bhattacharyya, Ameet Gadekar, Ninad Rajgopal

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2018•1 citation
Given a set of n d-dimensional Boolean vectors with the promise that the vectors are chosen uniformly at random with the exception of two vectors that have Pearson-correlation ρ (Hamming distance d · 1-ρ/2), how quickly can one find the two correlated vectors? We present an algorithm which, for any constants ε, ρ >; 0 and d >;>; logn/ρ2, finds the correlated pair with high probability, and runs in time O(n 3ω/4 + ϵ)1.8), where w2-O(ρ)), given by Paturi et al. [15], Locality Sensitive Hashing (LSH) [11] and the Bucketing Codes approach [6]. Applications and extensions of this basic algorithm yield improved algorithms for several other problems: ApproximateClosest Pair: For any sufficiently small constant ϵ >; 0, given n vectors in Rd, our algorithm returns a pair of vectors whose Euclidean distance differs from that of the closest pair by a factor of at most 1+ϵ, and runs in time O(n2-Θ(√ϵ)). The best previous algorithms (including LSH) have runtime O(n2-O(ϵ)). Learning Sparse Parity with Noise: Given samples from an instance of the learning parity with noise problem where each example has length n, the true parity set has size at most kkpoly(1/1-2η)0.8kpoly(1/1-2η). This is the first algorithm with no depenJence on η in the exponent of n, aside from the trivial brute-force algorithm. Learning k-Juntas with Noise: Given uniformly random length n Boolean vectors, together with a label, which is some function of just kkpoly(1/1-2η)0.8kpoly(1/1-2η), 2 which improves on the previous best of >; nk(1-2/2k)poly( 1/1-2η ), from [8]. Learning k-Juntas without Noise:1 Our results for learning sparse parities with noise imply an algorithm for learning juntas without noise with runtime n ω+ϵ/4kpoly(n)0.6kpoly(n), which improves on the runtime n ω+1/ω poly(n) ≈ n0.7kpoly(n) of Mossel n et al. [13].
We consider the problem of learning stabilizer states with noise in the Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) framework of Aaronson (2007) for learning quantum states. In the noiseless setting, an algorithm for this problem was recently given by Rocchetto (2018), but the noisy case was left open. Motivated by approaches to noise tolerance from classical learning theory, we introduce the Statistical Query (SQ) model for PAC-learning quantum states, and prove that algorithms in this model are indeed resilient to common forms of noise, including classification and depolarizing noise. We prove an exponential lower bound on learning stabilizer states in the SQ model. Even outside the SQ model, we prove that learning stabilizer states with noise is in general as hard as Learning Parity with Noise (LPN) using classical examples. Our results position the problem of learning stabilizer states as a natural quantum analogue of the classical problem of learning parities: easy in the noiseless setting, but seemingly intractable even with simple forms of noise.