Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer series on atomic, optical, and plasma physics

Conclusions and Prospectives

Naresh Chandra, R. Ghosh

Published Mar 15, 2012• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-24070-6_11

Related papers

Conclusions and Prospects

Thibaut Lacroix

Springer theses•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Future Prospects and Conclusion

Richard Hydomako

Springer theses•Dec 13, 2012•0 citations

Conclusion: New Prospects

Michael B. Mensky

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

Conclusions and Perspectives

F. Frémont

Springer series on atomic, optical, and plasma physics•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

Discussion and Conclusions

Christof Wetterich

Fundamental theories of physics•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

SHOULD WE FEAR QUANTUM TORMENT?

István A. Aranyosi

Abstract The prospect, in terms of subjective expectations, of immortality under the no‐collapse interpretation of quantum mechanics is certain, as pointed out by several authors, both physicists and, more recently, philosophers. The argument, known as quantum suicide, or quantum immortality, has received some critical discussion, but there hasn't been any questioning of David Lewis's point that there is a terrifying corollary to the argument, namely, that we should expect to live forever in a crippled, more and more damaged state, that barely sustains life. This is the prospect of eternal quantum torment. Based on some empirical facts, I argue for a conclusion that is much more reassuring than Lewis's terrible scenario. 1

Ratio•Aug 15, 2012•4 citations
Abstract The prospect, in terms of subjective expectations, of immortality under the no‐collapse interpretation of quantum mechanics is certain, as pointed out by several authors, both physicists and, more recently, philosophers. The argument, known as quantum suicide, or quantum immortality, has received some critical discussion, but there hasn't been any questioning of David Lewis's point that there is a terrifying corollary to the argument, namely, that we should expect to live forever in a crippled, more and more damaged state, that barely sustains life. This is the prospect of eternal quantum torment. Based on some empirical facts, I argue for a conclusion that is much more reassuring than Lewis's terrible scenario. 1