Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Compendium of Quantum Physics

Indeterminism and Determinism in Quantum Mechanics

Brigitte Falkenburg, Friedel Weinert

Published Jan 1, 2009• 9 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-540-70626-7_96

Related papers

Probability and Locality: Determinism Versus Indeterminism in Quantum Mechanics

W. Michael Dickson

•Jan 1, 1995•0 citations

Deterministic Quantum Mechanics versus Classical Mechanical Indeterminism

Mohamed Saladin El Naschie

International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation•Jan 1, 2007•42 citations

Indeterminism in Quantum Mechanics: Beyond and/or Within

Vasil Dinev Penchev

•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics

Ernst Cassirer, Otto Theodor Benfey, R. Bruce Lindsay

Physics Today•Jul 1, 1957•86 citations

Determinism and Quantum Mechanics

Grete Hermann

Studies in history and philosophy of science•Jan 1, 2016•8 citations

Is Indeterminism Supported by Quantum Theory?

Rollin W. Workman

Two initially different arguments for indeterminism are often based either upon the Uncertainty Relations or the statistical interpretation of the wave equation of quantum mechanics. Both arguments ultimately involve three factors: (1) the assumption that elementary entities are enough like classical particles for it to make sense to say they are either determined or indetermined, (2) the fact that no exact measurements are possible of quantities supposed to characterize elementary entities, (3) the pragmatic supposition that determinism is false unless exact predictions are theoretically possible. If it is legitimate to use (3) to prove indeterminism, then an equally legitimate argument can be based upon (2) which denies (1). Thus, it is doubtful that quantum mechanics supports indeterminism, though it may show that the concepts of ‘determined’ and ‘indetermined’ are inapplicable to the world.

Philosophy of Science•Jul 1, 1959•28 citations
Two initially different arguments for indeterminism are often based either upon the Uncertainty Relations or the statistical interpretation of the wave equation of quantum mechanics. Both arguments ultimately involve three factors: (1) the assumption that elementary entities are enough like classical particles for it to make sense to say they are either determined or indetermined, (2) the fact that no exact measurements are possible of quantities supposed to characterize elementary entities, (3) the pragmatic supposition that determinism is false unless exact predictions are theoretically possible. If it is legitimate to use (3) to prove indeterminism, then an equally legitimate argument can be based upon (2) which denies (1). Thus, it is doubtful that quantum mechanics supports indeterminism, though it may show that the concepts of ‘determined’ and ‘indetermined’ are inapplicable to the world.