Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

The polygonal path formulation of the Feynman path integral

Aubrey Truman

Published Apr 6, 2008• 54 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/3-540-09532-2_67

Related papers

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Herbert W. Hamber

Springer eBooks•Oct 17, 2008•1 citation

On the Formulation of the Feynman Path Integral Through Broken Line Paths

Wataru Ichinose

Communications in Mathematical Physics•Oct 1, 1997•33 citations

A Investigation of the Feynman Path Integral Formulation of Quantum Mechanics.

Maurice M. Mizrahi

•Jan 1, 1975•0 citations

On the Fourier series representations of path integrals

Antoine Royer

The direct transformation from the polygonal to the Fourier series representation of Feynman path integrals, via a change of integration variables, is effected explicitly for cases where the Lagrangian is of the form L(x,ẋ,t)= 1/2 ẋ2−V(x,t). This transformation involves a ‘‘functional Jacobian’’ stemming solely from the velocity term in the Lagrangian; this is because N-segment polygonal paths of the type contributing significantly to the integral, and their N-term Fourier series approximants, coalesce together as N→∞, but not their derivatives. We also consider integrals over paths with fixed means T−1∫T0 dt x(t) =const. The usefulness of the Fourier representation is illustrated with the harmonic oscillator case V(x)= 1/2 ω2x2, in both the free and fixed means situations; in particular, the Fourier evaluation of the path integrals trivially determines the large time phases (Maslov indices), and the ranges of ω2 values for which the integrals are finite or infinite in the imaginary time cases.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Oct 1, 1984•8 citations

MATHEMATICAL NATURE OF FEYNMAN PATH INTEGRAL

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Apr 1, 1993•0 citations

Feynman's Path Integrals and Henstock's Non-Absolute Integration

Patrick Muldowney

R. Feynman formulated quantum mechanics in terms of integrals over spaces of paths (Feynman path integrals). But the absolute value of Feynman's integrand is not integrable. And his integrand does not generate a measure. So Lebesgue integration theory could not be used by Feynman. To establish the equivalence of his theory with the traditional formulation of quantum mechanics, Feynman gave an argument that his path integral satisfies Schrödinger's equation. This paper gives a proof of this part of Feynman's theory. To justify Feynman's and other investigators' use of the language and concepts of integration and probability theory, and to justify taking limits under the integral sign in Feynman's integral, we use R. Henstock's approach to non-absolute integration, which does not require the measure concept, and for which the absolute value of the integrand need not be integrable.

Journal of Applied Analysis•Jan 1, 2000•20 citations
The direct transformation from the polygonal to the Fourier series representation of Feynman path integrals, via a change of integration variables, is effected explicitly for cases where the Lagrangian is of the form L(x,ẋ,t)= 1/2 ẋ2−V(x,t). This transformation involves a ‘‘functional Jacobian’’ stemming solely from the velocity term in the Lagrangian; this is because N-segment polygonal paths of the type contributing significantly to the integral, and their N-term Fourier series approximants, coalesce together as N→∞, but not their derivatives. We also consider integrals over paths with fixed means T−1∫T0 dt x(t) =const. The usefulness of the Fourier representation is illustrated with the harmonic oscillator case V(x)= 1/2 ω2x2, in both the free and fixed means situations; in particular, the Fourier evaluation of the path integrals trivially determines the large time phases (Maslov indices), and the ranges of ω2 values for which the integrals are finite or infinite in the imaginary time cases.
R. Feynman formulated quantum mechanics in terms of integrals over spaces of paths (Feynman path integrals). But the absolute value of Feynman's integrand is not integrable. And his integrand does not generate a measure. So Lebesgue integration theory could not be used by Feynman. To establish the equivalence of his theory with the traditional formulation of quantum mechanics, Feynman gave an argument that his path integral satisfies Schrödinger's equation. This paper gives a proof of this part of Feynman's theory. To justify Feynman's and other investigators' use of the language and concepts of integration and probability theory, and to justify taking limits under the integral sign in Feynman's integral, we use R. Henstock's approach to non-absolute integration, which does not require the measure concept, and for which the absolute value of the integrand need not be integrable.