Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Bose-Einstein Statistics and Fermi-Dirac Statistics: A Logical Error

Temur Z. Kalanov

Published Apr 22, 2006• 14 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein Statistics

IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks•Apr 10, 2013•0 citations

Bose-Einstein, Fermi-Dirac and Boltzmann Statistics, Quantum Gas

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Feb 5, 2017•0 citations

Exact Maxwell–Boltzmann, Bose–Einstein and Fermi–Dirac statistics

Robert K. Niven

arXiv:cond-mat/0412460•Physics Letters A•Jun 5, 2005•38 citations

Information geometry for Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein quantum statistics

Pedro Pessoa, Carlo Cafaro

arXiv:2103.00935•Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Apr 27, 2021•22 citations

Maslov probability spaces related to the Bose—Einstein and Fermi—Dirac statistics

Alexander Mikhailovich Chebotarev

Mathematical Notes•May 1, 1999•4 citations

The case against intermediate statistics

Bernard H. Lavenda, Jeremy Dunning-Davies

It is shown that intermediate statistics do not correspond to any physical process. The stationary probability distributions of intermediate statistics are not compatible with any mechanism which allows a variation between Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein statistics. The binomial and negative binomial distributions, characterizing Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein statistics, respectively, transform into the Poisson distribution, descriptive of classical statistics, as the number of energy cells increases without limit. These distributions are shown to be the laws of error leading to the average value as the most probable value.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•May 1, 1989•5 citations
It is shown that intermediate statistics do not correspond to any physical process. The stationary probability distributions of intermediate statistics are not compatible with any mechanism which allows a variation between Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein statistics. The binomial and negative binomial distributions, characterizing Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein statistics, respectively, transform into the Poisson distribution, descriptive of classical statistics, as the number of energy cells increases without limit. These distributions are shown to be the laws of error leading to the average value as the most probable value.