Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Born rule in quantum and classical mechanics (4 pages)

Paul W. Brumer

Published Jan 1, 2006• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Rescuing the Born rule for quantum cosmology

Joshua H Cooperman

Page has recently argued that the Born rule does not suffice for computing all probabilities in quantum cosmology. He further asserts that the Born rule's failure gives rise to the cosmological measure problem. Here I contend that Page's result stems from his use of an overly restrictive definition of the Born rule. In particular, I demonstrate that all of the probabilities he wishes to compute follow from the Born rule when generalized measurements are permitted. I also register two comments on Page's theoretical setting, relating respectively to Hilbert space dimensionality and permutation symmetry. These considerations lead me to conclude that the claimed insufficiency of the Born rule is by no means specific to the cosmological context.

arXiv:1010.3395•Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics•Feb 9, 2011•3 citations

Classical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics

Patrick A. Heelan

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1965•0 citations

Classical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics

Erhard Scheibe

Fundamental theories of physics•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

1 Rescuing the Born Rule for Quantum Cosmology

Joshua H. Cooperman

Page has recently argued that the Born rule does not suffice for computing all probabilities in quantum cosmology. He further asserts that the Born rule's failure gives rise to the cosmological measure problem. Here I contend that Page's result stems from his use of an overly restrictive definition of the Born rule. In particular, I demonstrate that all of the probabilities he wishes to compute follow from the Born rule when generalized measurements are permitted. I also register two comments on Page's theoretical setting, relating respectively to Hilbert space dimensionality and permutation symmetry. These considerations lead me to conclude that the claimed insufficiency of the Born rule is by no means specific to the cosmological context.

•Jan 1, 2011•2 citations

Born rule in quantum and classical mechanics

Paul W. Brumer, Jiangbin Gong

Considerable effort has been devoted to deriving the Born rule [i.e., that ${\ensuremath{\mid}\ensuremath{\psi}(x)\ensuremath{\mid}}^{2}dx$ is the probability of finding a system, described by $\ensuremath{\psi}$, between $x$ and $x+dx$] in quantum mechanics. Here we show that the Born rule is not solely quantum mechanical; rather, it arises naturally in the Hilbert-space formulation of classical mechanics as well. These results provide insights into the nature of the Born rule, and impact on its understanding in the framework of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:quant-ph/0604178•Physical Review A•May 19, 2006•74 citations

Rules of Quantum Mechanics

Alessandro Teta

UNITEXT for physics•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations
Page has recently argued that the Born rule does not suffice for computing all probabilities in quantum cosmology. He further asserts that the Born rule's failure gives rise to the cosmological measure problem. Here I contend that Page's result stems from his use of an overly restrictive definition of the Born rule. In particular, I demonstrate that all of the probabilities he wishes to compute follow from the Born rule when generalized measurements are permitted. I also register two comments on Page's theoretical setting, relating respectively to Hilbert space dimensionality and permutation symmetry. These considerations lead me to conclude that the claimed insufficiency of the Born rule is by no means specific to the cosmological context.
Page has recently argued that the Born rule does not suffice for computing all probabilities in quantum cosmology. He further asserts that the Born rule's failure gives rise to the cosmological measure problem. Here I contend that Page's result stems from his use of an overly restrictive definition of the Born rule. In particular, I demonstrate that all of the probabilities he wishes to compute follow from the Born rule when generalized measurements are permitted. I also register two comments on Page's theoretical setting, relating respectively to Hilbert space dimensionality and permutation symmetry. These considerations lead me to conclude that the claimed insufficiency of the Born rule is by no means specific to the cosmological context.
Considerable effort has been devoted to deriving the Born rule [i.e., that ${\ensuremath{\mid}\ensuremath{\psi}(x)\ensuremath{\mid}}^{2}dx$ is the probability of finding a system, described by $\ensuremath{\psi}$, between xxx and x+dxx+dxx+dx] in quantum mechanics. Here we show that the Born rule is not solely quantum mechanical; rather, it arises naturally in the Hilbert-space formulation of classical mechanics as well. These results provide insights into the nature of the Born rule, and impact on its understanding in the framework of quantum mechanics.