Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in physics

Time Delay and Tunneling

H. M. Nussenzveig

Published Jan 1, 2001• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/3-540-45409-8_15

Related papers

Time-Delay, Reflection Time Operator and Minimum Tunneling Time

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

More about Tunneling Time

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

Role of reflections in the generation of a time delay in strong-field ionization

Daniel Bakucz Canário, Michael Klaiber, Karen Z. Hatsagortsyan +1 more

The problem of time delay in tunneling ionization is revisited. The origin of time delay at the tunnel exit is analyzed, underlining the two faces of the concept of the tunneling time delay: the time delay around the tunnel exit and the asymptotic time delay at a detector. We show that the former time delay, in the sense of a delay in the peak of the wave function, exists as a matter of principle and arises due to the sub-barrier interference of the reflected and transmitted components of the tunneling electronic wave packet. We exemplify this by describing the tunneling ionization of an electron bound by a short-range potential within the strong-field approximation in a ``deep tunneling'' regime. If sub-barrier reflections are extracted from this wave function, then the time delay of the peak is shown to vanish. Thus, we assert that the disturbance of the tunneling wave packet by the reflection from the surface of the barrier causes a time delay in the neighborhood of the tunnel exit.

arXiv:2101.08096•Physical Review A•Sep 7, 2021•7 citations

The tunneling model

Aloïs Würger

Springer tracts in modern physics•Jan 1, 1997•0 citations

Universal behavior of tunneling time and barrier time-delay decoupling in attoclock measurements

Ossama Kullie

The measurement of the tunneling time-delay is hotly debated and remains controversial. In previous works, we showed that a model that accurately describes the time-delay measured by the attoclock experiment in adiabatic and nonadiabatic field calibrations. In the present work, we show that the tunneling time reveals a universal behavior with disentangled contributions. Even more remarkable is that the barrier tunneling time-delay can be convincingly defined and determined from the difference between the time-delay of adiabatic and nonadiabatic tunnel-ionization, which also show good agreement with experimental results. Furthermore, we illustrate that in the weak measurement limit, the barrier time-delay corresponds to the Larmor-clock time and the interaction time within the barrier.

•Feb 11, 2025•0 citations

Universal Behavior of Tunneling Time and Barrier Time-Delay Decoupling in Attoclock Measurements

Ossama Kullie

The measurement of the tunneling time-delay is hotly debated and remains controversial. In previous works, we showed that a model that accurately describes the time-delay measured by the attoclock experiment in adiabatic and nonadiabatic field calibrations. In the present work, we show that the tunneling time reveals a universal behavior with disentangled contributions. Even more remarkable is that the barrier tunneling time-delay can be convincingly defined and determined from the difference between the time-delay of adiabatic and nonadiabatic tunnel-ionization, which also show good agreement with experimental results. Furthermore, we illustrate that in the weak measurement limit, the barrier time-delay corresponds to the Larmor-clock time and the interaction time within the barrier.

arXiv:2402.14431•Feb 22, 2024•0 citations
The problem of time delay in tunneling ionization is revisited. The origin of time delay at the tunnel exit is analyzed, underlining the two faces of the concept of the tunneling time delay: the time delay around the tunnel exit and the asymptotic time delay at a detector. We show that the former time delay, in the sense of a delay in the peak of the wave function, exists as a matter of principle and arises due to the sub-barrier interference of the reflected and transmitted components of the tunneling electronic wave packet. We exemplify this by describing the tunneling ionization of an electron bound by a short-range potential within the strong-field approximation in a ``deep tunneling'' regime. If sub-barrier reflections are extracted from this wave function, then the time delay of the peak is shown to vanish. Thus, we assert that the disturbance of the tunneling wave packet by the reflection from the surface of the barrier causes a time delay in the neighborhood of the tunnel exit.
The measurement of the tunneling time-delay is hotly debated and remains controversial. In previous works, we showed that a model that accurately describes the time-delay measured by the attoclock experiment in adiabatic and nonadiabatic field calibrations. In the present work, we show that the tunneling time reveals a universal behavior with disentangled contributions. Even more remarkable is that the barrier tunneling time-delay can be convincingly defined and determined from the difference between the time-delay of adiabatic and nonadiabatic tunnel-ionization, which also show good agreement with experimental results. Furthermore, we illustrate that in the weak measurement limit, the barrier time-delay corresponds to the Larmor-clock time and the interaction time within the barrier.
The measurement of the tunneling time-delay is hotly debated and remains controversial. In previous works, we showed that a model that accurately describes the time-delay measured by the attoclock experiment in adiabatic and nonadiabatic field calibrations. In the present work, we show that the tunneling time reveals a universal behavior with disentangled contributions. Even more remarkable is that the barrier tunneling time-delay can be convincingly defined and determined from the difference between the time-delay of adiabatic and nonadiabatic tunnel-ionization, which also show good agreement with experimental results. Furthermore, we illustrate that in the weak measurement limit, the barrier time-delay corresponds to the Larmor-clock time and the interaction time within the barrier.