Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Stationary States in One Dimension II

Charles E. Burkhardt, Jacob J. Leventhal

Published Jan 1, 2008• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-0-387-77652-1_5

Related papers

Stationary States of One Particle in 3 Dimensions

Michele Cini

UNITEXT for physics•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Stationary States of One Particle in 3 Dimensions

Michele Cini

UNITEXT for physics•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Statics and dynamics of a one-dimensional quantum many-body system

Eugene B. Kolomeisky, Joseph P. Straley

The macroscopic zero-temperature behavior of weakly incommensurate systems in one dimension is described in terms of solitons. The soliton density n obeys equations displaying several types of singular interfacelike solutions: (i) equilibrium or moving boundary between the $n=0$ and finite n regions, and (ii) stationary or moving annihilation front separating solitons from antisolitons.

arXiv:cond-mat/9911003•Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Aug 8, 2001•1 citation

Stationary states in 1-D

Benjamin W. Schumacher, Michael D. Westmoreland

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 25, 2010•0 citations

Star-quantization of an infinite wall

S. V. Kryukov, Mark A. Walton

In deformation quantization (a.k.a. the Wigner–Weyl–Moyal formulation of quantum mechanics), we consider a single quantum particle moving freely in one dimension, except for the presence of one infinite potential wall. Dias and Prata pointed out that, surprisingly, its stationary-state Wigner function does not obey the naive equation of motion, i.e., the naive stargenvalue (*-genvalue) equation. We review our recent work on this problem that treats the infinite wall as the limit of a Liouville potential. Also included are some new results: (i) we show explicitly that the Wigner-Weyl transform of the usual density matrix is the physical solution, (ii) we prove that an effective-mass treatment of the problem is equivalent to the Liouville one, and (iii) we point out that self-adjointness of the operator Hamiltonian requires a boundary potential, but one apparently different from that proposed by Dias and Prata. PACS Nos.: 03.65.–w, 03.65.Ca, 03.65.Ge

arXiv:quant-ph/0508005•Canadian Journal of Physics•Jan 15, 2006•7 citations

Bound States in One Dimension

S. Brandt, Hans Dieter Dahmen, Tilo Stroh

Springer eBooks•Nov 26, 2010•0 citations
The macroscopic zero-temperature behavior of weakly incommensurate systems in one dimension is described in terms of solitons. The soliton density n obeys equations displaying several types of singular interfacelike solutions: (i) equilibrium or moving boundary between the n=0n=0n=0 and finite n regions, and (ii) stationary or moving annihilation front separating solitons from antisolitons.
In deformation quantization (a.k.a. the Wigner–Weyl–Moyal formulation of quantum mechanics), we consider a single quantum particle moving freely in one dimension, except for the presence of one infinite potential wall. Dias and Prata pointed out that, surprisingly, its stationary-state Wigner function does not obey the naive equation of motion, i.e., the naive stargenvalue (*-genvalue) equation. We review our recent work on this problem that treats the infinite wall as the limit of a Liouville potential. Also included are some new results: (i) we show explicitly that the Wigner-Weyl transform of the usual density matrix is the physical solution, (ii) we prove that an effective-mass treatment of the problem is equivalent to the Liouville one, and (iii) we point out that self-adjointness of the operator Hamiltonian requires a boundary potential, but one apparently different from that proposed by Dias and Prata. PACS Nos.: 03.65.–w, 03.65.Ca, 03.65.Ge