Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Theoretical Study of the no-Cloning Theorem

Koji Nagata, Tadao Nakamura

Published Jun 1, 2015• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

We review the no-cloning theorem that relies on the properties of the quantum theory. Usually, the no-cloning theorem implies that two quantum states are identical or orthogonal if we allow a cloning to be on the two quantum states. Here, we rely on the maximum value of the square of an expected value. We may result in the fact that the two quantum states under consideration could not be orthogonal if we consider the maximum value of the square of the expected value. The no-cloning theorem may imply that the two quantum states under consideration may be identical if we consider the maximum value of the square of the expected value. The nocloning theorem itself has this character.

Related papers

The no-Cloning Theorem Based on a Statistical Model

Koji Nagata, Tadao Nakamura

We investigate the no-cloning theorem that relies on the properties of a statistical model. Usually, the no-cloning theorem implies that two quantum states are identical or orthogonal if we allow a cloning to be on the two quantum states. Here, we rely on a statistical model. We may result in the fact that the two quantum states under consideration could not be orthogonal if we accept the statistical model. The no-cloning theorem may imply that the two quantum states under consideration may be identical if we accept the statistical model. The no-cloning theorem itself has this character.

•Sep 1, 2018•0 citations

Quantum Measurement Theory Improves the no-Cloning Theorem

Koji Nagata, Tadao Nakamura

We improve the no-cloning theorem that relies on the property of the quantum theory. Usually, the no-cloning theorem allows for a cloning two orthogonal quantum states, simultaneously. Here we take into account specific quantum measurement theory. We result in the fact that we cannot allow for a cloning two orthogonal quantum states, simultaneously. Especially, we systematically describe our assertion based on more mathematical analysis using raw data.

•Jul 1, 2013•0 citations

No-cloning implies unalterability of the past

Arkady Bolotin

A common way of stating the non-cloning theorem -- one of distinguishing characteristics of quantum theory -- is that one cannot make a copy of an arbitrary unknown quantum state. Even though this theorem is an important part of the ongoing discussion of the nature of a quantum state, the role of the theorem in the logical-algebraic approach to quantum theory has not yet been systematically studied. According to the standard point of view (which is in line with the logical tradition), quantum cloning amounts to two classical rules of inference, namely, monotonicity and idempotency of entailment. One can conclude then that the whole of quantum theory should be described through a logic wherein these rules do not hold, which is linear logic. However, in accordance with a supervaluational semantics (that allows one to retain all the theorems of classical logic while admitting `truth-value gaps'), quantum cloning necessitates the permanent loss of the truth values of experimental quantum propositions which violates the unalterability of the past. The present paper demonstrates this.

arXiv:1905.06766•May 16, 2019•0 citations

No-cloning of nonorthogonal states does not require inner product preserving

Dafa Li, Xiangrong Li, Hongtao Huang +1 more

The no-cloning theorem says there is no quantum copy machine which can copy any one-qubit state. Inner product preserving was always used to prove the no-cloning of nonorthogonal states. In this paper we show that the no-cloning of nonorthogonal states does not require inner product preserving and discuss the minimal properties which a linear operator possesses to copy two different states at the same device. In this paper, we obtain the following necessary and sufficient condition. For any two different states ∣ψ⟩=a∣0⟩+b∣1⟩ and ∣φ⟩=c∣0⟩+d∣1⟩, assume that a linear operator L can copy them, that is, L(∣ψ,0⟩)=∣ψ,ψ⟩ and L(∣φ,0⟩)=∣φ,φ⟩. Then the two states are orthogonal if and only if L(∣0,0⟩) and L(∣1,0⟩) are unit length states. Thus we only need linearity and that L(∣0,0⟩) and L(∣1,0⟩) are unit length states to prove the no-cloning of nonorthogonal states. It implies that inner product preserving is not necessary for the no-cloning of nonorthogonal states.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jul 28, 2005•2 citations

Survey: No-Cloning Theorem

Yuanzhi Li

The no-cloning theorem has always been a hot topic in quantum theorem: As an impossibility result, this theorem precludes attempts to communicated faster than light and reinforces the security of several quantum cryptography protocol. In this survey, I will briefly introduce the history of quantum no-cloning theorem–how the thesis was invented, how did it get its name; And i would also discuss the hitherto progress on no-cloning theorem, several approach of none-perfect cloning on non-orthogonal states as well as the application of quantum no-cloning theorem in quantum cryptography and quantum information. This survey incorporates the lecture ”Quantum Information Amplifiers Beyond the No-Cloning Theorem” given by Prof. Giulio Chiribella and ”Quantum cryptography” given by Prof. Xiongfeng Ma.

•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

Fundamental limits on quantum cloning from the no-signaling principle

Yanglin Hu, Marco Tomamichel

The no-cloning theorem is a cornerstone of quantum cryptography. Here we generalize and rederive in a unified framework various upper bounds on the maximum achievable fidelity of probabilistic and deterministic cloning machines. Building on ideas by Gisin [Phys. Lett. A 242, 1 (1998)], our result follows from the fact that remote state preparation is possible and the no-signaling principle holds. We apply our general theorem to several subsets of states that are of interest in quantum cryptography.

arXiv:2305.02002•Physical Review A•Feb 16, 2024•5 citations
We review the no-cloning theorem that relies on the properties of the quantum theory. Usually, the no-cloning theorem implies that two quantum states are identical or orthogonal if we allow a cloning to be on the two quantum states. Here, we rely on the maximum value of the square of an expected value. We may result in the fact that the two quantum states under consideration could not be orthogonal if we consider the maximum value of the square of the expected value. The no-cloning theorem may imply that the two quantum states under consideration may be identical if we consider the maximum value of the square of the expected value. The nocloning theorem itself has this character.
We investigate the no-cloning theorem that relies on the properties of a statistical model. Usually, the no-cloning theorem implies that two quantum states are identical or orthogonal if we allow a cloning to be on the two quantum states. Here, we rely on a statistical model. We may result in the fact that the two quantum states under consideration could not be orthogonal if we accept the statistical model. The no-cloning theorem may imply that the two quantum states under consideration may be identical if we accept the statistical model. The no-cloning theorem itself has this character.
A common way of stating the non-cloning theorem -- one of distinguishing characteristics of quantum theory -- is that one cannot make a copy of an arbitrary unknown quantum state. Even though this theorem is an important part of the ongoing discussion of the nature of a quantum state, the role of the theorem in the logical-algebraic approach to quantum theory has not yet been systematically studied. According to the standard point of view (which is in line with the logical tradition), quantum cloning amounts to two classical rules of inference, namely, monotonicity and idempotency of entailment. One can conclude then that the whole of quantum theory should be described through a logic wherein these rules do not hold, which is linear logic. However, in accordance with a supervaluational semantics (that allows one to retain all the theorems of classical logic while admitting `truth-value gaps'), quantum cloning necessitates the permanent loss of the truth values of experimental quantum propositions which violates the unalterability of the past. The present paper demonstrates this.
The no-cloning theorem says there is no quantum copy machine which can copy any one-qubit state. Inner product preserving was always used to prove the no-cloning of nonorthogonal states. In this paper we show that the no-cloning of nonorthogonal states does not require inner product preserving and discuss the minimal properties which a linear operator possesses to copy two different states at the same device. In this paper, we obtain the following necessary and sufficient condition. For any two different states ∣ψ⟩=a∣0⟩+b∣1⟩ and ∣φ⟩=c∣0⟩+d∣1⟩, assume that a linear operator L can copy them, that is, L(∣ψ,0⟩)=∣ψ,ψ⟩ and L(∣φ,0⟩)=∣φ,φ⟩. Then the two states are orthogonal if and only if L(∣0,0⟩) and L(∣1,0⟩) are unit length states. Thus we only need linearity and that L(∣0,0⟩) and L(∣1,0⟩) are unit length states to prove the no-cloning of nonorthogonal states. It implies that inner product preserving is not necessary for the no-cloning of nonorthogonal states.
The no-cloning theorem has always been a hot topic in quantum theorem: As an impossibility result, this theorem precludes attempts to communicated faster than light and reinforces the security of several quantum cryptography protocol. In this survey, I will briefly introduce the history of quantum no-cloning theorem–how the thesis was invented, how did it get its name; And i would also discuss the hitherto progress on no-cloning theorem, several approach of none-perfect cloning on non-orthogonal states as well as the application of quantum no-cloning theorem in quantum cryptography and quantum information. This survey incorporates the lecture ”Quantum Information Amplifiers Beyond the No-Cloning Theorem” given by Prof. Giulio Chiribella and ”Quantum cryptography” given by Prof. Xiongfeng Ma.
The no-cloning theorem is a cornerstone of quantum cryptography. Here we generalize and rederive in a unified framework various upper bounds on the maximum achievable fidelity of probabilistic and deterministic cloning machines. Building on ideas by Gisin [Phys. Lett. A 242, 1 (1998)], our result follows from the fact that remote state preparation is possible and the no-signaling principle holds. We apply our general theorem to several subsets of states that are of interest in quantum cryptography.