Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Compendium of Quantum Physics

Two-State Vector Formalism

Lev Vaidman A

Published Jan 1, 2009• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-540-70626-7_225

Related papers

The Two-State Vector Formalism: An Updated Review

Yakir Aharonov, Lev Vaidman A

Springer eBooks•Nov 29, 2007•193 citations

Measurement and collapse within the two-state vector formalism

Yakir Aharonov, Eliahu Cohen, Eyal Gruss +1 more

arXiv:1406.6382•Quantum Studies Mathematics and Foundations•Jul 25, 2014•49 citations

Measurement and Collapse within the Two-State-Vector Formalism

•Aug 15, 2016•0 citations

The Two-State Vector Formalism of Quantum Mechanics

Yakir Aharonov, Lev Vaidman A

Springer eBooks•Aug 3, 2007•63 citations

Stories in the two-state vector formalism

Patryk Michalski, Andrzej Dragan

Abstract The two-state vector formalism of quantum mechanics is a time-symmetrized approach to standard quantum theory. In our work, we aim to establish rigorous foundations for the future investigation within this formalism. We introduce the concept of a story—a compatible pair consisting of a two-state vector and an ideal measurement. Using this concept, we examine the structure of the space comprising all two-state vectors. We analyze the problem of distinguishability and confirm that some pairs of two-state vectors or their statistical mixtures cannot be physically distinguished. In particular, we discuss an example of a two-state vector that is indistinguishable from a statistical mixture of separable two-state vectors and provide an example of a two-state vector that can be distinguished from every such mixture. This leads us to formulate the definition of a strictly non-separable two-state vector as a genuine manifestation of entanglement between the past and the future.

arXiv:2409.04396•Journal of Physics Communications•Sep 24, 2025•2 citations

Two-state vector formalism and quantum interference

F. A. Hashmi, Fu Li, Shi-Yao Zhu +1 more

Abstract We show that two-state vector formalism (TSVF), applied to quantum systems that make use of delicate interference effects, can lead to paradoxes. We consider a few schemes of nested Mach–Zehnder interferometers that make use of destructive interference. A particular interpretation of TSVF applied to these schemes makes predictions that are contradictory to quantum theory and can not always be verified. Our results suggest that TSVF might not be a suitable tool to describe quantum systems that make use of delicate quantum interference effects.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jul 14, 2016•37 citations
Abstract The two-state vector formalism of quantum mechanics is a time-symmetrized approach to standard quantum theory. In our work, we aim to establish rigorous foundations for the future investigation within this formalism. We introduce the concept of a story—a compatible pair consisting of a two-state vector and an ideal measurement. Using this concept, we examine the structure of the space comprising all two-state vectors. We analyze the problem of distinguishability and confirm that some pairs of two-state vectors or their statistical mixtures cannot be physically distinguished. In particular, we discuss an example of a two-state vector that is indistinguishable from a statistical mixture of separable two-state vectors and provide an example of a two-state vector that can be distinguished from every such mixture. This leads us to formulate the definition of a strictly non-separable two-state vector as a genuine manifestation of entanglement between the past and the future.
Abstract We show that two-state vector formalism (TSVF), applied to quantum systems that make use of delicate interference effects, can lead to paradoxes. We consider a few schemes of nested Mach–Zehnder interferometers that make use of destructive interference. A particular interpretation of TSVF applied to these schemes makes predictions that are contradictory to quantum theory and can not always be verified. Our results suggest that TSVF might not be a suitable tool to describe quantum systems that make use of delicate quantum interference effects.