Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics

Recent progress on the unconditional security proof for quantum key distribution protocols

Masato Koashi

Published Jan 1, 2005• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1109/iqec.2005.1561130

Related papers

A Formal Approach to Unconditional Security Proofs for Quantum Key Distribution

Takahiro Kubota, Yoshihiko Kakutani, Go Kato +1 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2011•2 citations

Efficient Quantum Key Distribution Scheme and a Proof of Its Unconditional Security

Hoi‐Kwong Lo, H. F. Chau, M. Ardehali

Journal of Cryptology•Mar 3, 2004•558 citations

Simple proof of the unconditional security of the Bennett 1992 quantum key distribution protocol

Quan Zhang, Tang Chaojing

It is generally accepted that quantum key distribution (QKD) could supply legitimate users with unconditional security during their communication. Quite a lot of satisfactory efforts have been achieved on experimentations with quantum cryptography. However, when the eavesdropper has extra-powerful computational ability, has access to a quantum computer, for example, and can carry into execution any eavesdropping measurement that is allowed by the laws of physics, the security against such attacks has not been widely studied and rigorously proved for most QKD protocols. Quite recently, Shor and Preskill proved concisely the unconditional security of the Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol. Their method is highly valued for its clarity of concept and concision of form. In order to take advantage of the Shor-Preskill technique in their proof of the unconditional security of the BB84 QKD protocol, we introduced in this paper a transformation that can translate the Bennett 1992 (B92) protocol into the BB84 protocol. By proving that the transformation leaks no more information to the eavesdropper, we proved the unconditional security of the B92 protocol. We also settled the problem proposed by Lo about how to prove the unconditional security of the B92 protocol with the Shor-Preskill method.

Physical Review A•May 28, 2002•20 citations

Quantum Key Distribution and String Oblivious Transfer in Noisy Channels

Dominic R ayers

We prove the unconditional security of a quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol on a noisy channel against the most general attack allowed by quantum physics. We use the fact that in a previous paper we have reduced the proof of the unconditionally security of this QKD protocol to a proof that a corresponding Quantum String Oblivious Transfer (String-QOT) protocol would be unconditionally secure against Bob if implemented on top of an unconditionally secure bit commitment schcmc. We prove a lemma that extends a security proof given by Yao for a (one bit) QOT protocol to this String-QOT protocol. This result and the reduction mentioned above implies the unconditional security of our QKD protocol despite our previous proof that unconditionally secure bit commitment schemes are impossible.

•Jan 1, 2002•17 citations

Unconditional security of practical quantum key distribution

H. Inamori, N. Lütkenhaus, D. Mayers

arXiv:quant-ph/0107017•The European Physical Journal D•Jan 16, 2007•244 citations

Unconditional Security of Single-Photon Differential Phase Shift Quantum Key Distribution

Kai Wen, Kiyoshi Tamaki, Y. Yamamoto

In this Letter, we prove the unconditional security of the single-photon differential phase shift quantum key distribution (DPS-QKD) protocol, based on the conversion to an equivalent entanglement-based protocol. We estimate the upper bound of the phase error rate from the bit error rate, and show that the DPS-QKD protocol can generate an unconditionally secure key when the bit error rate is not greater than 4.12%. This proof is the first step to the unconditional security proof of a coherent state DPS-QKD.

arXiv:0806.2684•Physical Review Letters•Oct 22, 2009•63 citations
It is generally accepted that quantum key distribution (QKD) could supply legitimate users with unconditional security during their communication. Quite a lot of satisfactory efforts have been achieved on experimentations with quantum cryptography. However, when the eavesdropper has extra-powerful computational ability, has access to a quantum computer, for example, and can carry into execution any eavesdropping measurement that is allowed by the laws of physics, the security against such attacks has not been widely studied and rigorously proved for most QKD protocols. Quite recently, Shor and Preskill proved concisely the unconditional security of the Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol. Their method is highly valued for its clarity of concept and concision of form. In order to take advantage of the Shor-Preskill technique in their proof of the unconditional security of the BB84 QKD protocol, we introduced in this paper a transformation that can translate the Bennett 1992 (B92) protocol into the BB84 protocol. By proving that the transformation leaks no more information to the eavesdropper, we proved the unconditional security of the B92 protocol. We also settled the problem proposed by Lo about how to prove the unconditional security of the B92 protocol with the Shor-Preskill method.
We prove the unconditional security of a quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol on a noisy channel against the most general attack allowed by quantum physics. We use the fact that in a previous paper we have reduced the proof of the unconditionally security of this QKD protocol to a proof that a corresponding Quantum String Oblivious Transfer (String-QOT) protocol would be unconditionally secure against Bob if implemented on top of an unconditionally secure bit commitment schcmc. We prove a lemma that extends a security proof given by Yao for a (one bit) QOT protocol to this String-QOT protocol. This result and the reduction mentioned above implies the unconditional security of our QKD protocol despite our previous proof that unconditionally secure bit commitment schemes are impossible.
In this Letter, we prove the unconditional security of the single-photon differential phase shift quantum key distribution (DPS-QKD) protocol, based on the conversion to an equivalent entanglement-based protocol. We estimate the upper bound of the phase error rate from the bit error rate, and show that the DPS-QKD protocol can generate an unconditionally secure key when the bit error rate is not greater than 4.12%. This proof is the first step to the unconditional security proof of a coherent state DPS-QKD.