Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Resonance

Symmetries and conservation laws in classical and quantum mechanics

K. S. Mallesh, S. Chaturvedi, V. Balakrishnan, R. Simon, Narasimhaiengar Mukunda

Published Mar 1, 2011• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s12045-011-0030-3

Related papers

Intimate Connections: Symmetries and Conservation Laws in Quantum versus Classical Mechanics

Pablo Ruiz de Olano

In this article, I use a number of remarks made by Eugene Wigner to defend the claim that the nature of the connection between symmetries and conservation laws is different in quantum and in classical mechanics. In particular, I provide a list of three differences that obtain between the Hilbert space formulation of quantum mechanics and the Lagrangian formulation of classical mechanics. I also show that these differences are due to the fact that conservation laws are not the only consequence that symmetries have in quantum mechanics and to the fact that, in classical mechanics, the connection between symmetries and conservation laws does not always obtain.

Philosophy of Science•Dec 1, 2017•1 citation

Conservation Laws in Classical and Quantum Physics

Eugene Paul Wigner

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1997•5 citations

Symmetries and conservation laws in histories-based generalized quantum mechanics

Tulsi Dass, Yogesh N. Joglekar

Symmetries are defined in histories-based generalized quantum mechanics paying special attention to the class of history theories admitting quasitemporal structure (a generalization of the concept of `temporal sequences' of `events' using partial semigroups) and logic structure for `single time histories'. Symmetries are classified into orthochronous (those preserving the `temporal order' of `events') and non-orthochronous. A straightforward criterion for physical equivalence of histories is formulated in terms of orthochronous symmetries; this criterion covers various notions of physical equivalence considered by Gell-Mann and Hartle as special cases. In familiar situations, a reciprocal relationship between traditional symmetries (Wigner symmetries in quantum mechanics and Borel-measurable transformations of phase space in classical mechanics) and symmetries defined in this work is established. In a restricted class of theories, a definition of conservation law is given in the history language which agrees with the standard ones in familiar situations; in a smaller subclass of theories, a Noether type theorem (implying a connection between continuous symmetries of dynamics and conservation laws) is proved.

arXiv:gr-qc/9812018•Dec 5, 1998•0 citations

CONSERVATION LAWS IN QUANTUM MECHANICS

L.D. LANDAU, Efrat Lifshitz

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1974•8 citations

The missing piece of the jigsaw puzzle: probability conservation as a consequence of time-reversal symmetry

Hsiang Shun Chou

Abstract Physicists believe that there is a corresponding conservation law for each principle of symmetry. In standard textbooks on quantum mechanics, however, it is asserted that the time-reversal symmetry does not lead to any conservation law. There seems to be a missing piece of the jigsaw puzzle of the connection between the principles of symmetry and the conservation laws. In this paper, we resolve this difficulty by considering the time-reversal invariance of the transition probability a basic physical requirement of the time-reversal symmetry. We show that this requirement, together with the time-reversal covariance of the Schrödinger equation, guarantees the hermiticity of the Hamiltonian which ensures the probability conservation. Thus we complete the missing piece by demonstrating that the time-reversal symmetry leads to the probability conservation. The present paper can help undergraduate students gain deeper insight into the connection between the principles of symmetry and the conservation laws in quantum mechanics.

European Journal of Physics•Jun 27, 2019•1 citation

Symmetries and Quantum Mechanics

C. Vargas‐Hernández

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations
In this article, I use a number of remarks made by Eugene Wigner to defend the claim that the nature of the connection between symmetries and conservation laws is different in quantum and in classical mechanics. In particular, I provide a list of three differences that obtain between the Hilbert space formulation of quantum mechanics and the Lagrangian formulation of classical mechanics. I also show that these differences are due to the fact that conservation laws are not the only consequence that symmetries have in quantum mechanics and to the fact that, in classical mechanics, the connection between symmetries and conservation laws does not always obtain.
Symmetries are defined in histories-based generalized quantum mechanics paying special attention to the class of history theories admitting quasitemporal structure (a generalization of the concept of `temporal sequences' of `events' using partial semigroups) and logic structure for `single time histories'. Symmetries are classified into orthochronous (those preserving the `temporal order' of `events') and non-orthochronous. A straightforward criterion for physical equivalence of histories is formulated in terms of orthochronous symmetries; this criterion covers various notions of physical equivalence considered by Gell-Mann and Hartle as special cases. In familiar situations, a reciprocal relationship between traditional symmetries (Wigner symmetries in quantum mechanics and Borel-measurable transformations of phase space in classical mechanics) and symmetries defined in this work is established. In a restricted class of theories, a definition of conservation law is given in the history language which agrees with the standard ones in familiar situations; in a smaller subclass of theories, a Noether type theorem (implying a connection between continuous symmetries of dynamics and conservation laws) is proved.
Abstract Physicists believe that there is a corresponding conservation law for each principle of symmetry. In standard textbooks on quantum mechanics, however, it is asserted that the time-reversal symmetry does not lead to any conservation law. There seems to be a missing piece of the jigsaw puzzle of the connection between the principles of symmetry and the conservation laws. In this paper, we resolve this difficulty by considering the time-reversal invariance of the transition probability a basic physical requirement of the time-reversal symmetry. We show that this requirement, together with the time-reversal covariance of the Schrödinger equation, guarantees the hermiticity of the Hamiltonian which ensures the probability conservation. Thus we complete the missing piece by demonstrating that the time-reversal symmetry leads to the probability conservation. The present paper can help undergraduate students gain deeper insight into the connection between the principles of symmetry and the conservation laws in quantum mechanics.