Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Two-body problem in periodic potentials (8 pages)

Michiel Wouters

Published Jan 1, 2006• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Discrete breathers in BEC with two- and three-body interactions in optical lattice

F. Kh. Abdullaev, A. Bouketir, Azeddine Messikh +1 more

We investigate the properties of discrete breathers in a Bose-Einstein condensate with two- and three-body interactions in optical lattice. In the tight-binding approximation the Gross-Pitaevskii equation with periodic potential for the condensate wavefunction is reduced to the cubic-quintic discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation. We analyze the regions of modulational instabilities of nonlinear plane waves. This result is important to obtain the conditions for generation of discrete solitons(breathers) in optical lattice. Also using the Page approach, we derive the conditions for the existence and stability for bright discrete breather solutions. It is shown that the quintic nonlinearity brings qualitatively new conditions for stability of strongly localized modes. The numerical simulations conform with the analytical predictions.

arXiv:cond-mat/0605622•May 25, 2006•0 citations

Periodic Ground States and the Many-Body Problem

Eugene P. Gross

Physical Review Letters•Jun 15, 1960•26 citations

Lectures on the Many-Body Problem, Volume 2

E. R. Caianiello

•Jan 1, 1964•2 citations

Ground-State Many-Boson Problem with Repulsive Potentials

Leonard J. Eyges

We extend to the N-body case previous techniques for solving three-body problems with repulsive interparticle potentials and periodic boundary conditions on each particle. For clarity, we begin with one-dimensional problems, although the techniques are not peculiar to them and can be generalized to three dimensions. We decompose the wavefunction ψ into N(N − 1)/2 parts, according to Ψ= ∑ i<j=1Nψij;from the Schrödinger equation we find a basic equation for a typical ψij. As a test of this equation, we apply it for N = 4 and the case of δ-function interactions, and solve it numerically to find close agreement between the energy per particle of a four-body system and a system of the same density in which N → ∞. The numerical results are consistent with the analytic one that Eg(∞), which is the ground-state energy per particle of the system with an infinite number of particles, is related to Eg(N), which is that energy for the N-body system of the same density, by Eg(N) = Eg(∞)[1 − (1/N)] for weak repulsion and by Eg(N) = Eg(∞)[1 − (1/N2)] for very strong repulsion. We begin a similar comparison for the three-dimensional hard-sphere case by working out the problem of two hard spheres with periodic boundary conditions over a length L2 such that the density is the same as for an N-body problem in volume V=LN3:2/L23=N/LN3. We find that we get the analog of the one-dimensional result, for which case Eg(2) = Eg(∞)/2 for N = 2. That is, we find Eg(2) = πa2h/mv, which is just one-half of the many-body theory result. We also calculate the two-body correlation function and find good agreement with the many-body one, as calculated by Lee, Huang, and Yang.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Apr 1, 1969•0 citations

Improved Method for Quantum Mechanical Three-Body Problems. II. Repulsive Potentials

Leonard J. Eyges

We extend a method previously presented for the three-body problem with attractive interparticle potentials to the case of repulsive interparticle potentials, with periodic boundary conditions on each particle. As before, we decompose the wave function into three parts, and from the Schrödinger equation write equations for these parts. We observe that, in one-dimension and for δ-function potentials,these equations can be easily solved numerically, and we present these solutions for potential“strengths” ranging from zero to infinity. We then discuss a more general method for solving these equations, which method involves expansions in a certain set of two-body functions. This general method is not necessarily limited to either one dimension or δ-function potentials, but, as a check on it, we do apply it to that case and get good agreement with the previous numerical results. As a further exploration of the method, we apply it to square well potentials in one dimension. In an Appendix we discuss the set of two-body functions that we use.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•May 1, 1966•3 citations

Theoretical studies of few-body problems

Uttam Kumar Chowdhury

•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations
We investigate the properties of discrete breathers in a Bose-Einstein condensate with two- and three-body interactions in optical lattice. In the tight-binding approximation the Gross-Pitaevskii equation with periodic potential for the condensate wavefunction is reduced to the cubic-quintic discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation. We analyze the regions of modulational instabilities of nonlinear plane waves. This result is important to obtain the conditions for generation of discrete solitons(breathers) in optical lattice. Also using the Page approach, we derive the conditions for the existence and stability for bright discrete breather solutions. It is shown that the quintic nonlinearity brings qualitatively new conditions for stability of strongly localized modes. The numerical simulations conform with the analytical predictions.
We extend to the N-body case previous techniques for solving three-body problems with repulsive interparticle potentials and periodic boundary conditions on each particle. For clarity, we begin with one-dimensional problems, although the techniques are not peculiar to them and can be generalized to three dimensions. We decompose the wavefunction ψ into N(N − 1)/2 parts, according to Ψ= ∑ i<j=1Nψij;from the Schrödinger equation we find a basic equation for a typical ψij. As a test of this equation, we apply it for N = 4 and the case of δ-function interactions, and solve it numerically to find close agreement between the energy per particle of a four-body system and a system of the same density in which N → ∞. The numerical results are consistent with the analytic one that Eg(∞), which is the ground-state energy per particle of the system with an infinite number of particles, is related to Eg(N), which is that energy for the N-body system of the same density, by Eg(N) = Eg(∞)[1 − (1/N)] for weak repulsion and by Eg(N) = Eg(∞)[1 − (1/N2)] for very strong repulsion. We begin a similar comparison for the three-dimensional hard-sphere case by working out the problem of two hard spheres with periodic boundary conditions over a length L2 such that the density is the same as for an N-body problem in volume V=LN3:2/L23=N/LN3. We find that we get the analog of the one-dimensional result, for which case Eg(2) = Eg(∞)/2 for N = 2. That is, we find Eg(2) = πa2h/mv, which is just one-half of the many-body theory result. We also calculate the two-body correlation function and find good agreement with the many-body one, as calculated by Lee, Huang, and Yang.
We extend a method previously presented for the three-body problem with attractive interparticle potentials to the case of repulsive interparticle potentials, with periodic boundary conditions on each particle. As before, we decompose the wave function into three parts, and from the Schrödinger equation write equations for these parts. We observe that, in one-dimension and for δ-function potentials,these equations can be easily solved numerically, and we present these solutions for potential“strengths” ranging from zero to infinity. We then discuss a more general method for solving these equations, which method involves expansions in a certain set of two-body functions. This general method is not necessarily limited to either one dimension or δ-function potentials, but, as a check on it, we do apply it to that case and get good agreement with the previous numerical results. As a further exploration of the method, we apply it to square well potentials in one dimension. In an Appendix we discuss the set of two-body functions that we use.