Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

NATO ASI series. Series B : Physics

Continual Observations in Quantum Mechanics

Alberto Barchielli, L. Lanz, Giovanni Maria Prosperi

Published Jan 1, 1985• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4613-2443-0_22

Related papers

On the repeated measurement of continuous observables in quantum mechanics

E. B. Davies

Journal of Functional Analysis•Oct 1, 1970•114 citations

A model for the macroscopic description and continual observations in quantum mechanics

Alberto Barchielli, L. Lanz, Giovanni Maria Prosperi

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Nov 1, 1982•265 citations

Observation in quantum mechanics

H. S. Green

Il Nuovo Cimento•Sep 1, 1958•53 citations

Particle Decays

George Jaroszkiewicz

Particle Decays IntroductionIn this chapter we discuss experiments where the run architecture is significantly different from that of standard in-out experiments such as particle scattering.We apply the quantized detector network (QDN) formalism to particle decays, the ammonium molecular system, Kaon-type regeneration decay experiments, and quantum Zeno experiments.In all of these experiments, the problem is the modeling of time, which conventionally is taken to be continuous.In QDN, time is treated in terms of stages, which are discrete.We show how the QDN formalism deals with such experiments.In standard quantum mechanics (QM), time is assumed to be continuous.That is a legacy from classical mechanics (CM), which does not concern itself in general with the processes of observation.CM assumes systems under observation (SUOs) "have" physical properties that are independent of how they are observed.In contrast, QM cannot be considered without a discussion of the processes of observation.On close inspection of any process of observation, as it is actually carried out in the laboratory and not how it is modeled theoretically, the continuity of time does not look quite so obvious.The problem is that there are two mutually exclusive views about the nature of observation in physics.These were discussed in detail by Misra and Sudarshan (MS) in an influential paper on the quantum Zeno effect (Misra and Sudarshan, 1977).On the one hand, no known principle forbids the continuity of time, so the axioms of QM are stated implicitly in terms of continuous time.When the Schrödinger equation is postulated to be one of them (Peres, 1995), temporal continuity is assumed explicitly.On the other hand, it is an empirical fact that no experiment can actually monitor any SUO in a truly continuous way.All references to continuous time measurements are invariably based on statistical modeling of complex processes, with the continuity of time having much the same status as that of temperature.Such effective parameters are extremely useful in

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jul 13, 2023•1 citation

On the Problem of Hidden Variables for Quantum Mechanical Observables with Continuous Spectra

Paul Teller

Existing “no hidden variable proofs” for quantum mechanics deal exclusively with observables with discrete spectra. This note shows that similar results hold for observables with continuous spectra.

Philosophy of Science•Sep 1, 1977•3 citations

Continuous measurements in quantum theory

E.G. Eberle

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento•Oct 1, 1977•6 citations
Particle Decays IntroductionIn this chapter we discuss experiments where the run architecture is significantly different from that of standard in-out experiments such as particle scattering.We apply the quantized detector network (QDN) formalism to particle decays, the ammonium molecular system, Kaon-type regeneration decay experiments, and quantum Zeno experiments.In all of these experiments, the problem is the modeling of time, which conventionally is taken to be continuous.In QDN, time is treated in terms of stages, which are discrete.We show how the QDN formalism deals with such experiments.In standard quantum mechanics (QM), time is assumed to be continuous.That is a legacy from classical mechanics (CM), which does not concern itself in general with the processes of observation.CM assumes systems under observation (SUOs) "have" physical properties that are independent of how they are observed.In contrast, QM cannot be considered without a discussion of the processes of observation.On close inspection of any process of observation, as it is actually carried out in the laboratory and not how it is modeled theoretically, the continuity of time does not look quite so obvious.The problem is that there are two mutually exclusive views about the nature of observation in physics.These were discussed in detail by Misra and Sudarshan (MS) in an influential paper on the quantum Zeno effect (Misra and Sudarshan, 1977).On the one hand, no known principle forbids the continuity of time, so the axioms of QM are stated implicitly in terms of continuous time.When the Schrödinger equation is postulated to be one of them (Peres, 1995), temporal continuity is assumed explicitly.On the other hand, it is an empirical fact that no experiment can actually monitor any SUO in a truly continuous way.All references to continuous time measurements are invariably based on statistical modeling of complex processes, with the continuity of time having much the same status as that of temperature.Such effective parameters are extremely useful in