Quantum measurement protocols make use of the quantum nature of the universe to gain more information about a system using fewer resources than would otherwise be possible. Achieving precision at the fundamental limits imposed by quantum mechanics nevertheless remains a challenge. Adaptive quantum measurement protocols may allow us to step closer to these ultimate limits. We present an overview of some interesting recent results of quantum measurement schemes as demonstrated in single-photon optical implementations, in the contexts of unambiguous phase estimation and multiple-copy non-orthogonal state discrimination.
Quantum measurement protocols make use of the quantum nature of the universe to gain more information about a system using fewer resources than would otherwise be possible. Achieving precision at the fundamental limits imposed by quantum mechanics nevertheless remains a challenge. Adaptive quantum measurement protocols may allow us to step closer to these ultimate limits. We present an overview of some interesting recent results of quantum measurement schemes as demonstrated in single-photon optical implementations, in the contexts of unambiguous phase estimation and multiple-copy non-orthogonal state discrimination.
Adaptive techniques make practical many quantum measurements that would otherwise be beyond current laboratory capabilities. For example, they allow discrimination of nonorthogonal states with a probability of error equal to the Helstrom bound, measurement of the phase of a quantum oscillator with accuracy approaching (or in some cases attaining) the Heisenberg limit (HL), and estimation of phase in interferometry with a variance scaling at the HL, using only single qubit measurement and control. Each of these examples has close links with quantum information, in particular, experimental optical quantum information: the first is a basic quantum communication protocol; the second has potential application in linear optical quantum computing; the third uses an adaptive protocol inspired by the quantum phase estimation algorithm. We discuss each of these examples and their implementation in the laboratory, but concentrate upon the last, which was published most recently [Higginset al.,Nature, vol. 450, p. 393, 2007].
The use of quantum resources can provide measurement precision beyond the shot noise limit (SNL). The task of ab initio optical phase measurement-the estimation of a completely unknown phase-has been experimentally demonstrated with precision beyond the SNL, and even scaling like the ultimate bound, the Heisenberg limit (HL), but with an overhead factor. However, existing approaches have not been able-even in principle-to achieve the best possible precision, saturating the HL exactly. Here we demonstrate a scheme to achieve true HL phase measurement, using a combination of three techniques: entanglement, multiple samplings of the phase shift, and adaptive measurement. Our experimental demonstration of the scheme, with photonic qubits and N = 3 photon-passes, achieves a precision that is within 4% of the HL, surpassing the best precision theoretically achievable with simpler techniques. This work represents a fundamental achievement of the ultimate limits of metrology, and the scheme can be extended to higher N and other physical systems.
We derive, and experimentally demonstrate, an interferometric scheme for unambiguous phase estimation with precision scaling at the Heisenberg limit that does not require adaptive measurements. That is, with no prior knowledge of the phase, we can obtain an estimate of the phase with a standard deviation that is only a small constant factor larger than the minimum physically allowed value. Our scheme resolves the phase ambiguity that exists when multiple passes through a phase shift, or NOON states, are used to obtain improved phase resolution. Like a recently introduced adaptive technique (Higgins et al 2007 Nature 450 393), our experiment uses multiple applications of the phase shift on single photons. By not requiring adaptive measurements, but rather using a predetermined measurement sequence, the present scheme is both conceptually simpler and significantly easier to implement. Additionally, we demonstrate a simplified adaptive scheme that also surpasses the standard quantum limit for single passes.
Abstract. We derive, and experimentally demonstrate, an interferometric scheme for unambiguous phase estimation with precision scaling at the Heisenberg limit that does not require adaptive measurements. That is, with no prior knowledge of the phase, we can obtain an estimate of the phase with a standard deviation that is only a small constant factor larger than the minimum physically allowed value. Our scheme resolves the phase ambiguity that exists when multiple passes through a phase shift, or NOON states, are used to obtain improved phase resolution. Like a recently introduced adaptive technique [Higgins et al 2007 Nature 450 393], our experiment uses multiple applications of the phase shift on single photons. By not requiring adaptive measurements, but rather using a predetermined measurement sequence, the present scheme is both conceptually simpler and significantly easier to implement. Additionally, we demonstrate a simplified adaptive scheme that also surpasses the standard quantum limit for single passes. PACS numbers: 03.67.-a, 42.50.St, 03.65.TaHeisenberg-limited phase estimation without adaptive measts 2 1.
In these notes, based on lectures given as part of the Les Houches summer school on Quantum Optics and Nanophotonics in August, 2013, I have tried to give a brief survey of some important approaches and modern tendencies in quantum measurement. I wish it to be clear from the outset that I shy explicitly away from the "quantum measurement problem," and that the present treatment aims to elucidate the theory and practice of various ways in which measurements can, in light of quantum mechanics, be carried out; and various formalisms for describing them. While the treatment is by necessity largely theoretical, the emphasis is meant to be on an experimental "perspective" on measurement -- that is, to place the priority on the possibility of gaining information through some process, and then attempting to model that process mathematically and consider its ramifications, rather than stressing a particular mathematical definition as the {\it sine qua non} of measurement. The textbook definition of measurement as being a particular set of mathematical operations carried out on particular sorts of operators has been so well drilled into us that many have the unfortunate tendency of saying "that experiment can't be described by projections onto the eigenstates of a Hermitian operator, so it is not really a measurement," when of course any practitioner of an experimental science such as physics should instead say "that experiment allowed us to measure something, and if the standard theory of measurement does not describe it, the standard theory of measurement is incomplete." Idealisations are important, but when the real world breaks the approximations made in the theory, it is the theory which must be fixed, and not the real world.