Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

Improved Non-committing Encryption Schemes Based on a General Complexity Assumption

Ivan Damgård, Jesper Buus Nielsen

Published Jan 1, 2000• 177 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/3-540-44598-6_27

Related papers

Non-committing Encryption with Constant Ciphertext Expansion from Standard Assumptions

Yusuke Yoshida, Fuyuki Kitagawa, Keita Xagawa +1 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2020•3 citations

Improved Non-committing Encryption with Applications to Adaptively Secure Protocols

Seung Geol Choi, Dana Dachman-Soled, Tal Malkin +1 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2009•79 citations

A Non-committing Encryption Scheme Based on Quadratic Residue

Feiyu Lei, Wen Chen, Kefei Chen

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2006•4 citations

Error-free, Multi-bit Non-committing Encryption with Constant Round Complexity

Huafei Zhu, Feng Bao

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2011•4 citations

Improved Non-Committing Encryption Schemes based on a General Complexity Assumption

Ivan Damgård, Jesper Buus Nielsen

Non-committing encryption enables the construction of multiparty computation protocols secure against an adaptive adversary in the computational setting where private channels between players are not assumed. While any non-committing encryption scheme must be secure in the ordinary semantic sense, the converse is not necessarily true. We propose a construction of non-committing encryption that can be based on any public key system which is secure in the ordinary sense and which has an extra property we call simulatability. The construction contains an earlier proposed scheme by Beaver based on the Die-Hellman problem as a special case, and we propose another implementation based on RSA. In a more general setting, our construction can be based on any collection of trapdoor one-way permutations with a certain simulatability property. This offers a considerable efficiency improvement over the first non-committing encryption scheme proposed by Canetti et al. Finally, at some loss of efficiency, our scheme can be based on general collections of trapdoor one-way permutations without the simulatability assumption, and without the common domain assumption of Canetti et al.

BRICS Report Series•Jan 6, 2000•6 citations

A Framework for Efficient Fully-Equipped UC Commitments.

Eiichiro Fujisaki

We present a general framework for constructing non-interactive universally composable (UC) commitment schemes that are secure against adaptive adversaries in the non-erasure setting under a single re-usable common reference string. Previously, such “fully-equipped ” UC commitment schemes are only known in [8, 9], with an unavoidable overhead of O(κ) in the sense of communication and computational complexities; meaning that to commit λ bits, the communication and computational costs require O(λκ), where κ denotes the security parameter. Efficient construction of a fully-equipped UC commitment scheme was a long-standing open problem. We introduce a cryptographic primitive, called all-but-many encryptions (ABMEs), and prove that it is a translation of fully-equipped UC commitment in the primitive level. We then construct ABMEs from cryptographic primitives that we call a probabilistic pseudo random function family and extractable sigma protocols – the former is a probabilistic version of a pseudo random function family and the latter is a special kind of sigma (i.e., canonical 3-round public-coin HVSZK) protocols with some extractability. We provide fully-equipped UC commitment schemes from ABMEs under DDH and DCR-based assumptions, respectively. In particular, the DCR-based scheme is the first fully-equipped UC commitment scheme with optimal expansion factor Ω(1); to commit κ bits, the communication and computational costs are Ω(κ). We further construct a fully-equipped UC commitment scheme from a general assumption (in which trap-door permutations exist), which is far more efficient than the previous construction [9], because, unlike [9], our construction does not require non-interactive zero-knowledge proof systems. 1

•Jan 1, 2012•1 citation
Non-committing encryption enables the construction of multiparty computation protocols secure against an adaptive adversary in the computational setting where private channels between players are not assumed. While any non-committing encryption scheme must be secure in the ordinary semantic sense, the converse is not necessarily true. We propose a construction of non-committing encryption that can be based on any public key system which is secure in the ordinary sense and which has an extra property we call simulatability. The construction contains an earlier proposed scheme by Beaver based on the Die-Hellman problem as a special case, and we propose another implementation based on RSA. In a more general setting, our construction can be based on any collection of trapdoor one-way permutations with a certain simulatability property. This offers a considerable efficiency improvement over the first non-committing encryption scheme proposed by Canetti et al. Finally, at some loss of efficiency, our scheme can be based on general collections of trapdoor one-way permutations without the simulatability assumption, and without the common domain assumption of Canetti et al.
We present a general framework for constructing non-interactive universally composable (UC) commitment schemes that are secure against adaptive adversaries in the non-erasure setting under a single re-usable common reference string. Previously, such “fully-equipped ” UC commitment schemes are only known in [8, 9], with an unavoidable overhead of O(κ) in the sense of communication and computational complexities; meaning that to commit λ bits, the communication and computational costs require O(λκ), where κ denotes the security parameter. Efficient construction of a fully-equipped UC commitment scheme was a long-standing open problem. We introduce a cryptographic primitive, called all-but-many encryptions (ABMEs), and prove that it is a translation of fully-equipped UC commitment in the primitive level. We then construct ABMEs from cryptographic primitives that we call a probabilistic pseudo random function family and extractable sigma protocols – the former is a probabilistic version of a pseudo random function family and the latter is a special kind of sigma (i.e., canonical 3-round public-coin HVSZK) protocols with some extractability. We provide fully-equipped UC commitment schemes from ABMEs under DDH and DCR-based assumptions, respectively. In particular, the DCR-based scheme is the first fully-equipped UC commitment scheme with optimal expansion factor Ω(1); to commit κ bits, the communication and computational costs are Ω(κ). We further construct a fully-equipped UC commitment scheme from a general assumption (in which trap-door permutations exist), which is far more efficient than the previous construction [9], because, unlike [9], our construction does not require non-interactive zero-knowledge proof systems. 1