Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Mechanics With Relativity A Different Approach

Mourici Shachter

Published Jul 1, 2013• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

In this short paper I will show another procedure to solve Quantum Mechanics with Relativity. This procedure is very simple and can explain what really happens and why in the investigated system

Related papers

Relativity and quantum mechanics

B. G. Sidharth

We first deduce Special Relativity from Quantum Mechanics. Then we discuss the implications and ramifications.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•May 14, 2015•1 citation

A Non-Simple and Not Completed History of Quantum Mechanics and Really Long History of Resolving the Problem of Time as a Quantum Observable

V. S. Olkhovsky

It shortly described a far from being completed history of quantum mechanics-quantum theory of measurements.Furthermore, there was a relatively recently finished chapter of quantum mechanics which for a long time had not been resolved.This chapter is dedicated to time as a quantum observable, canonically conjugated to energy.And the mathematical reasons for its principal resolving are explained.

OALib•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

What happens if measure the electron spin twice?

Yuan-Chuan Zou

The mainstream textbooks of quantum mechanics explains the quantum state collapses into an eigenstate in the measurement, while other explanations such as hidden variables and multi-universe deny the collapsing. Here we propose an ideal thinking experiment on measuring the spin of an electron with 3 steps. It is simple and straightforward, in short, to measure a spin-up electron in x-axis, and then in z-axis. Whether there is a collapsing predicts different results of the experiment. The future realistic experiment will show the quantum state collapses or not in the measurement.

arXiv:1802.08071•Feb 21, 2018•0 citations

The Theory of Quantum Relativity

Daniel Cordero Grau

In this Article I lay down the Theory of Quantum Relativity which unify Quantum Mechanics of Bohr, Planck, Heisenberg and Schrodinger and Relativity of Einstein

•Aug 1, 2017•0 citations

Theory of Relativity or Quantum Mechanics

Valentin Malinov

Why scientists stating that the Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics they are not compatible, and one of them probably is wrong?

•Dec 1, 2020•0 citations

How come the Correlations?

Nicolas Gisin

In relativity there is space-time out there. In quantum mechanics there is entanglement. Entanglement manifests itself by producing correlations between classical events (e.g. the firing of some detectors) at any two space-time locations. If the locations are time-like separated, i.e. one is in the future of the other, then there is no specific difficulty to understand the correlations. But if the two locations are space-like separated, the problem is different. How can the two space-time locations out there know about what happens in each other without any sort of communication? If space-time really exists, the locations must do something like communicating. Or it was all set up at the Beginning. But the correlations depend also on the free choice of the experimentalists, one in each space-time location. This allowed John Bell to derive his inequality and the experimentalists to violate it, thus refuting the assumption that it was all set up at the beginning: the Correlations can't be explained by common causes.

arXiv:quant-ph/0503007•Mar 1, 2005•5 citations
The mainstream textbooks of quantum mechanics explains the quantum state collapses into an eigenstate in the measurement, while other explanations such as hidden variables and multi-universe deny the collapsing. Here we propose an ideal thinking experiment on measuring the spin of an electron with 3 steps. It is simple and straightforward, in short, to measure a spin-up electron in x-axis, and then in z-axis. Whether there is a collapsing predicts different results of the experiment. The future realistic experiment will show the quantum state collapses or not in the measurement.
In relativity there is space-time out there. In quantum mechanics there is entanglement. Entanglement manifests itself by producing correlations between classical events (e.g. the firing of some detectors) at any two space-time locations. If the locations are time-like separated, i.e. one is in the future of the other, then there is no specific difficulty to understand the correlations. But if the two locations are space-like separated, the problem is different. How can the two space-time locations out there know about what happens in each other without any sort of communication? If space-time really exists, the locations must do something like communicating. Or it was all set up at the Beginning. But the correlations depend also on the free choice of the experimentalists, one in each space-time location. This allowed John Bell to derive his inequality and the experimentalists to violate it, thus refuting the assumption that it was all set up at the beginning: the Correlations can't be explained by common causes.