Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Elsevier eBooks

VIRTUAL LOGIC

AUGUST STERN

Published Jan 1, 2000• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/b978-044482618-3/50084-x

Related papers

Virtual Logic-The Logic of Quantum Theory.

Louis Hirsch Kauffman

•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Atomic logic

Valerie Jamieson

The New Scientist•Feb 1, 2008•0 citations

NOT logic

Nicolas Gisin

Nature•Oct 1, 2002•6 citations

Virtual Logical Qubits: A Compact Architecture for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing

Jonathan M. Baker, Casey Duckering, David Schuster +1 more

Fault-tolerant quantum computing is required to execute many of the most promising quantum applications. In recent years, numerous error correcting codes, such as the surface code, have emerged which are well suited for current and future limited connectivity 2-D devices. We find quantum memory, particularly resonant cavities with transmon qubits arranged in a 2.5-D architecture, can efficiently implement surface codes with around 20× fewer transmons via this work. We virtualize 2-D memory addresses by storing the code in layers of qubit memories connected to each transmon. Distributing logical qubits across many memories has minimal impact on fault tolerance and results in substantially more efficient logical operations. Virtualized logical qubit (VLQ) systems can achieve fault tolerance comparable to conventional 2-D transmon-only architectures while putting within reach a proof-of-concept experimental demonstration of around ten logical qubits, requiring only 11 transmons and 9 attached cavities.

IEEE Micro•Apr 14, 2021•3 citations

Many Minds Logic Virtual Reality Probability Limit & Pruned Plenitude

Sascha Vongehr

Virtual Reality (VR) and “reality” are indistinguishable. The implied limit on low probabilities is very similar or even description-dual to the Planck length. Resolving Newcomb's Predictor Paradox further elucidates the nature of causality in such “timeless” physics. All these support that Many Minds (MM) analytic logic “prunes plenitude” to less than the unfettered fecundity of unitary quantum physics. It must avoid Real-VR-mistakes such as VR or brains “giving rise” to associated minds. Such is unacceptable without addressing obvious ethical objections. This in turn results at once in conclusions relevant to religion. VR administrators doubt their own reality. This reformulates the “fundamental creator gods” regress. A secular religion emerges. An “all seeing eye” demands merit, not mere belief. Finding “one's self” resurrected necessitates memory passing judgment.

•Jul 1, 2020•0 citations

Noisy Logic

Michael Schirber

Focus•Mar 1, 2009•0 citations
Fault-tolerant quantum computing is required to execute many of the most promising quantum applications. In recent years, numerous error correcting codes, such as the surface code, have emerged which are well suited for current and future limited connectivity 2-D devices. We find quantum memory, particularly resonant cavities with transmon qubits arranged in a 2.5-D architecture, can efficiently implement surface codes with around 20× fewer transmons via this work. We virtualize 2-D memory addresses by storing the code in layers of qubit memories connected to each transmon. Distributing logical qubits across many memories has minimal impact on fault tolerance and results in substantially more efficient logical operations. Virtualized logical qubit (VLQ) systems can achieve fault tolerance comparable to conventional 2-D transmon-only architectures while putting within reach a proof-of-concept experimental demonstration of around ten logical qubits, requiring only 11 transmons and 9 attached cavities.
Virtual Reality (VR) and “reality” are indistinguishable. The implied limit on low probabilities is very similar or even description-dual to the Planck length. Resolving Newcomb's Predictor Paradox further elucidates the nature of causality in such “timeless” physics. All these support that Many Minds (MM) analytic logic “prunes plenitude” to less than the unfettered fecundity of unitary quantum physics. It must avoid Real-VR-mistakes such as VR or brains “giving rise” to associated minds. Such is unacceptable without addressing obvious ethical objections. This in turn results at once in conclusions relevant to religion. VR administrators doubt their own reality. This reformulates the “fundamental creator gods” regress. A secular religion emerges. An “all seeing eye” demands merit, not mere belief. Finding “one's self” resurrected necessitates memory passing judgment.