Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Symmetries and Transformations

Edward B. Manoukian

Published Jan 16, 2007• 16 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4020-4190-7_2

Related papers

Generating lattice non-invertible symmetries

Weiguang Cao, Linhao Li, Masahito Yamazaki

Lattice non-invertible symmetries have rich fusion structures and play important roles in understanding various exotic topological phases. In this paper, we explore methods to generate new lattice non-invertible transformations/symmetries from a given non-invertible seed transformation/symmetry. The new lattice non-invertible symmetry is constructed by composing the seed transformations on different sites or sandwiching a unitary transformation between the transformations on the same sites. In addition to known non-invertible symmetries with fusion algebras of Tambara-Yamagami \mathbb Z_N×\mathbb Z_N ℤ N × ℤ N type, we obtain a new non-invertible symmetry in models with \mathbb Z_N ℤ N dipole symmetries. We name the latter the dipole Kramers-Wannier symmetry because it arises from gauging the dipole symmetry. We further study the dipole Kramers-Wannier symmetry in depth, including its topological defect, its anomaly and its associated generalized Kennedy-Tasaki transformation.

arXiv:2406.05454•SciPost Physics•Oct 4, 2024•28 citations

Symmetries and Invariances

Edgard Elbaz

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1998•1 citation

Observability, Redundancy, and Modality for Dynamical Symmetry Transformations

David Wallace

This chapter provides a fairly systematic analysis of when quantities that are variant under a dynamical symmetry transformation should be regarded as unobservable, or redundant, or unreal; of when models related by a dynamical symmetry transformation represent the same state of affairs; and of when mathematical structure that is variant under a dynamical symmetry transformation should be regarded as surplus. In most of these cases, the answer is ‘it depends’: that is, it depends on the details of the symmetry in question. A central feature of the analysis is that in order to draw any of these conclusions for a dynamical symmetry, it needs to be understood in terms of its possible extensions to other physical systems, in particular to measurement devices.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 31, 2022•58 citations

Symmetries and Symmetry Breaking

Theoretical and mathematical physics•Nov 29, 2008•0 citations

SYMMETRIES AND INVARIANCES

M. Sozzi

This chapter reviews the general theory of transformations in quantum theory. Topics covered include symmetry and invariance, transformations and symmetries in quantum theory, symmetries and conservation laws, discrete transformations and inversions, and symmetry violations. Suggested further reading and exercise problems are provided at the end of the chapter.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Nov 1, 2007•1 citation

Symmetries

K. Tamvakis

Undergraduate texts in physics•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations
Lattice non-invertible symmetries have rich fusion structures and play important roles in understanding various exotic topological phases. In this paper, we explore methods to generate new lattice non-invertible transformations/symmetries from a given non-invertible seed transformation/symmetry. The new lattice non-invertible symmetry is constructed by composing the seed transformations on different sites or sandwiching a unitary transformation between the transformations on the same sites. In addition to known non-invertible symmetries with fusion algebras of Tambara-Yamagami \mathbb Z_N×\mathbb Z_N ℤ N × ℤ N type, we obtain a new non-invertible symmetry in models with \mathbb Z_N ℤ N dipole symmetries. We name the latter the dipole Kramers-Wannier symmetry because it arises from gauging the dipole symmetry. We further study the dipole Kramers-Wannier symmetry in depth, including its topological defect, its anomaly and its associated generalized Kennedy-Tasaki transformation.
This chapter provides a fairly systematic analysis of when quantities that are variant under a dynamical symmetry transformation should be regarded as unobservable, or redundant, or unreal; of when models related by a dynamical symmetry transformation represent the same state of affairs; and of when mathematical structure that is variant under a dynamical symmetry transformation should be regarded as surplus. In most of these cases, the answer is ‘it depends’: that is, it depends on the details of the symmetry in question. A central feature of the analysis is that in order to draw any of these conclusions for a dynamical symmetry, it needs to be understood in terms of its possible extensions to other physical systems, in particular to measurement devices.