Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Pairwise complementary observables and their mutually unbiased bases

Berge Englert

Published Mar 24, 2011• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Mutually Unbiased Bases: complementary observables in finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces

Prabha Mandayam

•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

Complementary decompositions and unextendible mutually unbiased bases

András Szántó

arXiv:1502.05245•Linear Algebra and its Applications•Feb 13, 2016•10 citations

Test of mutually unbiased bases for six-dimensional photonic quantum systems

Vincenzo D’Ambrosio, Filippo Cardano, Ebrahim Karimi +4 more

In quantum information, complementarity of quantum mechanical observables plays a key role. The eigenstates of two complementary observables form a pair of mutually unbiased bases (MUBs). More generally, a set of MUBs consists of bases that are all pairwise unbiased. Except for specific dimensions of the Hilbert space, the maximal sets of MUBs are unknown in general. Even for a dimension as low as six, the identification of a maximal set of MUBs remains an open problem, although there is strong numerical evidence that no more than three simultaneous MUBs do exist. Here, by exploiting a newly developed holographic technique, we implement and test different sets of three MUBs for a single photon six-dimensional quantum state (a "qusix"), encoded exploiting polarization and orbital angular momentum of photons. A close agreement is observed between theory and experiments. Our results can find applications in state tomography, quantitative wave-particle duality, quantum key distribution.

arXiv:1304.4081•Scientific Reports•Sep 25, 2013•43 citations

Constructing Extremal Compatible Quantum Observables by Means of Two Mutually Unbiased Bases

Claudio Carmeli, Gianni Cassinelli, Alessandro Toigo

arXiv:1904.09451•Foundations of Physics•Jun 1, 2019•4 citations

Mutually unbiased bases and complementary spin 1 observables

Paweł Kurzyński, Wawrzyniec Kaszub, Mikołaj Czechlewski

The two observables are incompatible if they cannot be measured simultaneously; however, they become maximally incompatible (complementary) if their eigenstates are mutually unbiased. Only then does the measurement of one observable give no information about the other observable. The spin projection operators onto three mutually orthogonal directions are complementary only for spin 1/2. For higher spin numbers the corresponding eigenstates are no longer unbiased. In this work we examine the properties of spin 1 mutually unbiased bases (MUB) and look for the physical meaning of the corresponding operators. We show that if the computational basis is chosen to be the eigenbasis of the spin projection operator along some direction z , then all the states, which are unbiased to this basis, have to be squeezed. Next, we study the generation and the measurement of MUB states by introducing the Fourier-like transform through spin squeezing. Finally, we try to ascribe some classical interpretation to the operators corresponding to MUB and study what information the observer gains while measuring them. Higher spin numbers are also considered.

arXiv:0905.1723•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jun 4, 2010•9 citations

Position, Momentum, and the Standard Model Fermions

Carl A. Brannen, John Gideon Hartnett, Paul C Abbott

Measuring the position of a free electron gives it an unknown momentum. A second measurement will give a new position far away. On the other hand, consecutive measurements of spin give the same result. In this talk we attempt to unify these very different behaviors.Position and momentum are complementary observables. An eigenstate of position has no information about momentum and vice versa. For an N‐dimensional Hilbert space we say that two bases |aj〉, and |bk〉 are “mutually unbiased” if all their transition probabilities are equal: |〈aj|bk〉|2 = 1/N. Position and momentum are similar to mutually unbiased bases, but for an infinite dimensional Hilbert space.Svetlichny discovered that Feynman’s (position) path integral can be interpreted as a sum over products of mutually unbiased bases. This raises the question “what happens when we compute spin‐1/2 path integrals over mutually unbiased bases?” There are three pairwise mutually unbiased bases for spin‐1/2. We compute the long time propagators of spin path integrals and show that a natural description of the three generations of elementary particles results. We discuss the lepton masses and other material.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations
In quantum information, complementarity of quantum mechanical observables plays a key role. The eigenstates of two complementary observables form a pair of mutually unbiased bases (MUBs). More generally, a set of MUBs consists of bases that are all pairwise unbiased. Except for specific dimensions of the Hilbert space, the maximal sets of MUBs are unknown in general. Even for a dimension as low as six, the identification of a maximal set of MUBs remains an open problem, although there is strong numerical evidence that no more than three simultaneous MUBs do exist. Here, by exploiting a newly developed holographic technique, we implement and test different sets of three MUBs for a single photon six-dimensional quantum state (a "qusix"), encoded exploiting polarization and orbital angular momentum of photons. A close agreement is observed between theory and experiments. Our results can find applications in state tomography, quantitative wave-particle duality, quantum key distribution.
The two observables are incompatible if they cannot be measured simultaneously; however, they become maximally incompatible (complementary) if their eigenstates are mutually unbiased. Only then does the measurement of one observable give no information about the other observable. The spin projection operators onto three mutually orthogonal directions are complementary only for spin 1/2. For higher spin numbers the corresponding eigenstates are no longer unbiased. In this work we examine the properties of spin 1 mutually unbiased bases (MUB) and look for the physical meaning of the corresponding operators. We show that if the computational basis is chosen to be the eigenbasis of the spin projection operator along some direction z , then all the states, which are unbiased to this basis, have to be squeezed. Next, we study the generation and the measurement of MUB states by introducing the Fourier-like transform through spin squeezing. Finally, we try to ascribe some classical interpretation to the operators corresponding to MUB and study what information the observer gains while measuring them. Higher spin numbers are also considered.
Measuring the position of a free electron gives it an unknown momentum. A second measurement will give a new position far away. On the other hand, consecutive measurements of spin give the same result. In this talk we attempt to unify these very different behaviors.Position and momentum are complementary observables. An eigenstate of position has no information about momentum and vice versa. For an N‐dimensional Hilbert space we say that two bases |aj〉, and |bk〉 are “mutually unbiased” if all their transition probabilities are equal: |〈aj|bk〉|2 = 1/N. Position and momentum are similar to mutually unbiased bases, but for an infinite dimensional Hilbert space.Svetlichny discovered that Feynman’s (position) path integral can be interpreted as a sum over products of mutually unbiased bases. This raises the question “what happens when we compute spin‐1/2 path integrals over mutually unbiased bases?” There are three pairwise mutually unbiased bases for spin‐1/2. We compute the long time propagators of spin path integrals and show that a natural description of the three generations of elementary particles results. We discuss the lepton masses and other material.