Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

Quantum Separation of Local Search and Fixed Point Computation

Xi Chen, Xiaoming Sun, Shang‐Hua Teng

Published Aug 12, 2008• 8 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-540-69733-6_18

Related papers

Quantum Separation of Local Search and Fixed Point Computation

Xi Chen, Xiaoming Sun, Shang‐Hua Teng

Algorithmica•Feb 24, 2009•0 citations

Quantum fixed-point search algorithm with general phase shifts

Dafa Li

Frontiers of Computer Science in China•Jun 1, 2008•1 citation

An N/4 fixed-point duality quantum search algorithm

Liang Hao, Dan Liu, GuiLu Long

Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy•Jul 26, 2010•23 citations

Revisiting fixed-point quantum search: proof of the quasi-Chebyshev lemma

Guanzhong Li, Shiguang Feng, Lvzhou li

arXiv:2403.02057•Frontiers of Computer Science•Feb 20, 2026•1 citation

Fixed-point quantum search for different phase shifts

Dafa Li, Xiangrong Li, Hongtao Huang +1 more

arXiv:quant-ph/0604062•Physics Letters A•Oct 19, 2006•15 citations

Paths Beyond Local Search: A Nearly Tight Bound for Randomized Fixed-Point Computation

Xi Chen, Shang‐Hua Teng

In 1983, Aldous proved that randomization can speedup local search. For example, it reduces the query complexity of local search over [1:n]^d from Theta (n^{d-1}) to O (d^{1/2}n^{d/2}). It remains open whether randomization helps fixed-point computation. Inspired by this open problem and recent advances on equilibrium computation, we have been fascinated by the following question: Is a fixed-point or an equilibrium fundamentally harder to find than a local optimum? In this paper, we give a nearly-tight bound of Omega(n)^{d-1} on the randomized query complexity for computing a fixed point of a discrete Brouwer function over [1:n]^d. Since the randomized query complexity of global optimization over [1:n]^d is Theta (n^{d}), the randomized query model over [1:n]^d strictly separates these three important search problems: Global optimization is harder than fixed-point computation, and fixed-point computation is harder than local search. Our result indeed demonstrates that randomization does not help much in fixed-point computation in the query model; the deterministic complexity of this problem is Theta (n^{d-1}).

arXiv:cs/0702088•Feb 16, 2007•2 citations
In 1983, Aldous proved that randomization can speedup local search. For example, it reduces the query complexity of local search over [1:n]^d from Theta (n^{d-1}) to O (d^{1/2}n^{d/2}). It remains open whether randomization helps fixed-point computation. Inspired by this open problem and recent advances on equilibrium computation, we have been fascinated by the following question: Is a fixed-point or an equilibrium fundamentally harder to find than a local optimum? In this paper, we give a nearly-tight bound of Omega(n)^{d-1} on the randomized query complexity for computing a fixed point of a discrete Brouwer function over [1:n]^d. Since the randomized query complexity of global optimization over [1:n]^d is Theta (n^{d}), the randomized query model over [1:n]^d strictly separates these three important search problems: Global optimization is harder than fixed-point computation, and fixed-point computation is harder than local search. Our result indeed demonstrates that randomization does not help much in fixed-point computation in the query model; the deterministic complexity of this problem is Theta (n^{d-1}).