Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Optimal phase measurements with pure Gaussian states (8 pages)

Alex Monràs

Published Jan 1, 2006• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Related papers

Structure of the phase in pure two-mode Gaussian states (7 pages)

A. K. Rajagopal, R. W. Rendell

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Entanglement of pure two-mode Gaussian states (7 pages)

R. W. Rendell, A. K. Rajagopal

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2005•1 citation

Reexamination of optimal quantum state estimation of pure states (5 pages)

A. Hayashi, T. Hashimoto

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Gaussian cloning of coherent states with known phases (3 pages)

Moorad Alexanian

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Minimal disturbance measurement for coherent states is non-Gaussian (7 pages)

Ladislav Mišta

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Finding Gaussian Structure in Bosonic States

Alvan Arulandu, Sitan Chen, Ziyun Chen +2 more

We study agnostic tomography of pure bosonic Gaussian states: given copies of an arbitrary $n$-mode bosonic state $ρ$, the goal is to output a pure Gaussian state whose infidelity with $ρ$ is at most $\mathrm{opt} + ε$, where $\mathrm{opt}$ is the minimum infidelity achievable by any pure Gaussian state. We give efficient protocols achieving this in both the high and low fidelity regimes. When $\mathrm{opt}$ is below some universal constant, our protocol has runtime and copy complexity which is strongly polynomial in $n, 1/ε$ and $\log \log E$, where $E$ is the energy of the closest pure Gaussian state. For arbitrary $\mathrm{opt}$, our protocol uses $(n+1)^{\mathrm{poly}(1/ε)} \mathrm{poly}\left(1+\log\log(E)\right)$ copies and runtime. As a corollary, we obtain the first truly tolerant Gaussianity testing protocol for distinguishing whether $\mathrm{opt} > c + ε$ or $\mathrm{opt} < c - ε$, for any threshold $c\in(0,1)$. We also prove $\mathrm{poly}(n,1/ε)$ runtime is impossible, unless $\mathrm{NP}\subseteq\mathrm{BQP}$. Our protocols follow a shared paradigm: first, we iteratively use general Gaussian measurements combined with techniques from classical robust statistics to obtain a good warm start estimate, then we leverage non-Gaussian measurements to refine this warm start using convex and non-convex optimization methods. Interestingly, we prove that non-Gaussian measurements are necessary to match the strong agnostic guarantees we obtain, and in fact these guarantees are provably superior to what is possible for robustly estimating classical Gaussians.

quant-pharXiv:2610.06810•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations
We study agnostic tomography of pure bosonic Gaussian states: given copies of an arbitrary nnn-mode bosonic state ρρρ, the goal is to output a pure Gaussian state whose infidelity with ρρρ is at most opt+ε\mathrm{opt} + εopt+ε, where opt\mathrm{opt}opt is the minimum infidelity achievable by any pure Gaussian state. We give efficient protocols achieving this in both the high and low fidelity regimes. When opt\mathrm{opt}opt is below some universal constant, our protocol has runtime and copy complexity which is strongly polynomial in n,1/εn, 1/εn,1/ε and log⁡log⁡E\log \log EloglogE, where EEE is the energy of the closest pure Gaussian state. For arbitrary opt\mathrm{opt}opt, our protocol uses (n+1)poly(1/ε)poly(1+log⁡log⁡(E))(n+1)^{\mathrm{poly}(1/ε)} \mathrm{poly}\left(1+\log\log(E)\right)(n+1)poly(1/ε)poly(1+loglog(E)) copies and runtime. As a corollary, we obtain the first truly tolerant Gaussianity testing protocol for distinguishing whether opt>c+ε\mathrm{opt} > c + εopt>c+ε or opt<c−ε\mathrm{opt} < c - εopt<c−ε, for any threshold c∈(0,1)c\in(0,1)c∈(0,1). We also prove poly(n,1/ε)\mathrm{poly}(n,1/ε)poly(n,1/ε) runtime is impossible, unless NP⊆BQP\mathrm{NP}\subseteq\mathrm{BQP}NP⊆BQP. Our protocols follow a shared paradigm: first, we iteratively use general Gaussian measurements combined with techniques from classical robust statistics to obtain a good warm start estimate, then we leverage non-Gaussian measurements to refine this warm start using convex and non-convex optimization methods. Interestingly, we prove that non-Gaussian measurements are necessary to match the strong agnostic guarantees we obtain, and in fact these guarantees are provably superior to what is possible for robustly estimating classical Gaussians.