Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The frontiers collection

Towards a General Operational and Realistic Framework for Quantum Mechanics and Relativity Theory

Diederik Aerts, Sven Aerts

Published Jan 1, 2005• 23 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/3-540-26669-0_11

Related papers

Hilbert Space Quantum Mechanics is Contextual (Reply to R. B. Griffiths)

Christian DE RONDE

In a recent paper Griffiths [38] has argued, based on the consistent histories interpretation, that Hilbert space quantum mechanics (QM) is noncontextual. According to Griffiths the problem of contextuality disappears if the apparatus is "designed and operated by a competent experimentalist" and we accept the Single Framework Rule (SFR). We will argue from a representational realist stance that the conclusion is incorrect due to the misleading understanding provided by Griffiths to the meaning of quantum contextuality and its relation to physical reality and measurements. We will discuss how the quite general incomprehension of contextuality has its origin in the "objective-subjective omelette" created by Heisenberg and Bohr. We will argue that in order to unscramble the omelette we need to disentangle, firstly, representational realism from naive realism, secondly, ontology from epistemology, and thirdly, the different interpretational problems of QM. In this respect, we will analyze what should be considered as Meaningful Physical Statements (MPS) within a theory and will argue that Counterfactual Reasoning (CR) -considered by Griffiths as "tricky"- must be accepted as a necessary condition for any representational realist interpretation of QM. Finally we discuss what should be considered as a problem (and what not) in QM from a representational realist perspective.

arXiv:1502.05396•Feb 18, 2015•3 citations

A Unified Conceptual Foundation for Relativity and Quantum Mechanics

Tirupattur Srinivasan Natarajan

Physics Essays•Jun 1, 1996•4 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Relativity Theory

Joginder Singh Galsin

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2025•1 citation

Completing Quantum Mechanics within the Framework of Local Realism

Guang-Liang Li

In the Einstein-Bohr debate, Einstein considered quantum mechanics incomplete and disagreed with Born’s probabilistic interpretation of wave-functions. Observers in the axioms of quantum mechanics also bothered Einstein. Inspired by Einstein, Bell and his followers intended to complete quantum mechanics within the framework of local realism. Regrettably, the deterministic correlation between distant components of a separable system in Einstein’s local-realist description of the world is mistaken for non-locality in the world described by Bell’s theorem, leading to incorrect interpretations of experimental results obtained by testing Bell inequalities. This article introduces a new principle, the general principle of measurements, which is proved as a mathematical theorem and allows quantum mechanics to be completed within the framework of local realism while keeping the formal axiomatic definition of a general Hilbert space unchanged. The completed theory can provide the same probabilistic predictions of empirical results as those provided by the current theory. Using disjunction (“or”) as the logical relation between superposed orthonormal vectors, the completed theory precludes observers in the axioms of the current theory and inexplicable collapses of wave-functions, thus it is intuitively comprehensible and alleviates much difficulty in understanding quantum mechanics. Among various world views, Einstein’s local-realist world view is correct.

•Jun 11, 2025•0 citations

Introducing a Unifying Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics

N. Glenn Gratke

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Apr 22, 2006•0 citations

Completing Quantum Mechanics within the Framework of Local Realism

Guang-Liang Li

In the Einstein-Bohr debate, Einstein considered quantum mechanics incomplete and disagreed with Born's probabilistic interpretation of wave-functions. Observers in the axioms of the theory also bothered Einstein. Inspired by Einstein, Bell and his followers intended to complete quantum mechanics within the framework of local realism. Regrettably, the deterministic correlation between distant components of a separable system in Einstein's local-realist description of the world is mistaken for non-locality in the world described by Bell's theorem, which interprets the experimental results of testing Bell inequalities incorrectly. This article introduces a new principle, the general principle of measurements, which is proved as a mathematical theorem, allowing quantum mechanics to be completed within the framework of local realism while keeping the definition of a general Hilbert space unchanged. Using disjunction (``or'') as the logical relation between superposed orthonormal vectors, the completed quantum theory provides the same probabilistic predictions of empirical results as those provided by the current version of the theory, precludes inexplicable collapses of wave-functions, eliminates observers from the axioms of quantum mechanics, and is intuitively comprehensible, thus alleviating much difficulty experienced by many people in understanding the theory in its present form. Among various world views, Einstein's local-realist world view is correct.

•Jul 10, 2025•0 citations
In a recent paper Griffiths [38] has argued, based on the consistent histories interpretation, that Hilbert space quantum mechanics (QM) is noncontextual. According to Griffiths the problem of contextuality disappears if the apparatus is "designed and operated by a competent experimentalist" and we accept the Single Framework Rule (SFR). We will argue from a representational realist stance that the conclusion is incorrect due to the misleading understanding provided by Griffiths to the meaning of quantum contextuality and its relation to physical reality and measurements. We will discuss how the quite general incomprehension of contextuality has its origin in the "objective-subjective omelette" created by Heisenberg and Bohr. We will argue that in order to unscramble the omelette we need to disentangle, firstly, representational realism from naive realism, secondly, ontology from epistemology, and thirdly, the different interpretational problems of QM. In this respect, we will analyze what should be considered as Meaningful Physical Statements (MPS) within a theory and will argue that Counterfactual Reasoning (CR) -considered by Griffiths as "tricky"- must be accepted as a necessary condition for any representational realist interpretation of QM. Finally we discuss what should be considered as a problem (and what not) in QM from a representational realist perspective.
In the Einstein-Bohr debate, Einstein considered quantum mechanics incomplete and disagreed with Born’s probabilistic interpretation of wave-functions. Observers in the axioms of quantum mechanics also bothered Einstein. Inspired by Einstein, Bell and his followers intended to complete quantum mechanics within the framework of local realism. Regrettably, the deterministic correlation between distant components of a separable system in Einstein’s local-realist description of the world is mistaken for non-locality in the world described by Bell’s theorem, leading to incorrect interpretations of experimental results obtained by testing Bell inequalities. This article introduces a new principle, the general principle of measurements, which is proved as a mathematical theorem and allows quantum mechanics to be completed within the framework of local realism while keeping the formal axiomatic definition of a general Hilbert space unchanged. The completed theory can provide the same probabilistic predictions of empirical results as those provided by the current theory. Using disjunction (“or”) as the logical relation between superposed orthonormal vectors, the completed theory precludes observers in the axioms of the current theory and inexplicable collapses of wave-functions, thus it is intuitively comprehensible and alleviates much difficulty in understanding quantum mechanics. Among various world views, Einstein’s local-realist world view is correct.
In the Einstein-Bohr debate, Einstein considered quantum mechanics incomplete and disagreed with Born's probabilistic interpretation of wave-functions. Observers in the axioms of the theory also bothered Einstein. Inspired by Einstein, Bell and his followers intended to complete quantum mechanics within the framework of local realism. Regrettably, the deterministic correlation between distant components of a separable system in Einstein's local-realist description of the world is mistaken for non-locality in the world described by Bell's theorem, which interprets the experimental results of testing Bell inequalities incorrectly. This article introduces a new principle, the general principle of measurements, which is proved as a mathematical theorem, allowing quantum mechanics to be completed within the framework of local realism while keeping the definition of a general Hilbert space unchanged. Using disjunction (``or'') as the logical relation between superposed orthonormal vectors, the completed quantum theory provides the same probabilistic predictions of empirical results as those provided by the current version of the theory, precludes inexplicable collapses of wave-functions, eliminates observers from the axioms of quantum mechanics, and is intuitively comprehensible, thus alleviating much difficulty experienced by many people in understanding the theory in its present form. Among various world views, Einstein's local-realist world view is correct.