Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Restrictions and Extensions of States

Jan Hamhalter

Published Jan 1, 2003• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-017-0119-8_9

Related papers

Extensions of the Adiabatic Theorem in Quantum Mechanics

Ralph H. Young, Walter J. Deal

In a quantum-mechanical problem with a slowly varying Hamiltonian, such as appears in a semiclassical treatment of inelastic atomic collisions, it is common to restrict attention to a small number of states among which transitions are anticipated. This procedure is justified by an extension of the conventional adiabatic theorem to nearly degenerate states. The correct mixing within the restricted basis is determined by a time-dependent variational principle. The contribution of states outside the basis vanishes as the time scale for variation of the Hamiltonian becomes large. A further generalization deals with pseudoeigenfunctions, such as appear in the theory of the Stark effect.

Physical Review A•Feb 1, 1970•10 citations

State Reconstruction

Paul Busch, PEKKA J. LAHTI, Juha-Pekka Pellonpää +1 more

Theoretical and mathematical physics•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Limiting the complexity of quantum states: a toy theory

Valerio Scarani

This paper discusses a restriction of quantum theory, in which very complex states would be excluded. The toy theory is phrased in the language of the circuit model for quantum computing, its key ingredient being a limitation on the number of interactions that \textit{each} qubit may undergo. As long as one stays in the circuit model, the toy theory is consistent and may even match what we shall be ever able to do in a controlled laboratory experiment. The direct extension of the restriction beyond the circuit model conflicts with observed facts: the possibility of restricting the complexity of quantum state, while saving phenomena, remains an open question.

arXiv:1503.08545•Mar 30, 2015•0 citations

States and effects

Springer eBooks•Apr 6, 2008•28 citations

Quasi–free states

Jan Dereziński, Christian Gérard

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 4, 2022•0 citations

Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

Daniel Huber, Eric J. Heller

We propose an extension of the semiclassical Gaussian wave packet dynamics to eliminate the three main restrictions of this method. The first restriction is that the wave packet is forced to remain Gaussian. This is correct only for quadratic, linear, or constant potentials. The second restriction is that the method is, in general, not able to treat most classically forbidden processes. The third restriction is that the norm is conserved only for Gaussian wave packets. For a superposition of Gaussians this is no longer true. We can eliminate these restrictions by an extension of the method into complex phase space, keeping time real.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Nov 1, 1987•179 citations
In a quantum-mechanical problem with a slowly varying Hamiltonian, such as appears in a semiclassical treatment of inelastic atomic collisions, it is common to restrict attention to a small number of states among which transitions are anticipated. This procedure is justified by an extension of the conventional adiabatic theorem to nearly degenerate states. The correct mixing within the restricted basis is determined by a time-dependent variational principle. The contribution of states outside the basis vanishes as the time scale for variation of the Hamiltonian becomes large. A further generalization deals with pseudoeigenfunctions, such as appear in the theory of the Stark effect.
This paper discusses a restriction of quantum theory, in which very complex states would be excluded. The toy theory is phrased in the language of the circuit model for quantum computing, its key ingredient being a limitation on the number of interactions that \textit{each} qubit may undergo. As long as one stays in the circuit model, the toy theory is consistent and may even match what we shall be ever able to do in a controlled laboratory experiment. The direct extension of the restriction beyond the circuit model conflicts with observed facts: the possibility of restricting the complexity of quantum state, while saving phenomena, remains an open question.
We propose an extension of the semiclassical Gaussian wave packet dynamics to eliminate the three main restrictions of this method. The first restriction is that the wave packet is forced to remain Gaussian. This is correct only for quadratic, linear, or constant potentials. The second restriction is that the method is, in general, not able to treat most classically forbidden processes. The third restriction is that the norm is conserved only for Gaussian wave packets. For a superposition of Gaussians this is no longer true. We can eliminate these restrictions by an extension of the method into complex phase space, keeping time real.