Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Galilean Symmetry of Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Domenico Giulini

Published Jan 1, 2003• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-662-05328-7_15

Related papers

Symmetries of non-relativistic quantum-mechanical Hamiltonian

Bojan Tunguz

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 20, 2009•0 citations

Locality as a Theorem of Galilean Covariance in Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Nidhal Mghirbi

The Kinematic locality of the Quantum Probability current that has for long been treated as an independent axiom, is proven here to be a theorem of Galilean symmetry group.

•Jan 14, 2026•0 citations

Galilei general relativistic quantum mechanics revisited

Josef Janyška, Arkadiusz Jadczyk, Marco Modugno

•Jan 1, 1998•13 citations

NON-RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM MECHANICS

Michael Dickson

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 2007•65 citations

Locality, Complex Numbers, and Relativistic Quantum Theory

Simon W. Saunders

What is relativistic quantum theory? How does it differ from non-relativistic quantum mechanics? Is there something more involved than the transition from the Galilean group to the Lorentz group? These questions are evidently of great importance to the understanding of relativistic quantum theory (RQT), in particular to the distinction between the basic principles of quantum theory, and the characterization of a particular class of dynamical evolutions. Within non-relativistic quantum mechanics (NRQM) a reasonably precise response is possible (differences concern the number of degrees of freedom, the existence of internal symmetries, and the form of the Hamiltonian as a function of the canonical variables); what appears characteristic of RQT is the appearance of a dynamics of a qualitatively different character (involving the creation and annihilation of particles), involving new kinds of constraints (renormalization theory: anomalies). Nevertheless, it seems we must know how to pass from the inhomogeneous Galilean group (IHGG) to the Lorentz group (IHLG), if only because we have successfully constructed a RQT, surely, then, we know what it is that we hold invariant in this transition.

PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association•Jan 1, 1992•19 citations

Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Graduate student series in physics•Sep 1, 2002•5 citations
What is relativistic quantum theory? How does it differ from non-relativistic quantum mechanics? Is there something more involved than the transition from the Galilean group to the Lorentz group? These questions are evidently of great importance to the understanding of relativistic quantum theory (RQT), in particular to the distinction between the basic principles of quantum theory, and the characterization of a particular class of dynamical evolutions. Within non-relativistic quantum mechanics (NRQM) a reasonably precise response is possible (differences concern the number of degrees of freedom, the existence of internal symmetries, and the form of the Hamiltonian as a function of the canonical variables); what appears characteristic of RQT is the appearance of a dynamics of a qualitatively different character (involving the creation and annihilation of particles), involving new kinds of constraints (renormalization theory: anomalies). Nevertheless, it seems we must know how to pass from the inhomogeneous Galilean group (IHGG) to the Lorentz group (IHLG), if only because we have successfully constructed a RQT, surely, then, we know what it is that we hold invariant in this transition.