Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Sources of Decoherence in the Transmon Qubit.

J. A. Schreier, Steve Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf

Published Mar 7, 2007• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Sources of decoherence in fixed frequency transmon qubits

Andreas Fuhrer, Matthias Mergenthaler, Peter R. Müeller +6 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 6, 2019•0 citations

Decoherence in Improved Transmon Qubits

Adam Sears, Hanhee Paik, David Schuster +5 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 25, 2011•0 citations

Distinguishing and Mitigating Decoherence Mechanisms in Transmon Qubits

Kyle Serniak, Greg Calusine, Alexander J. Melville +6 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 16, 2021•0 citations

Suppressing Charge Noise Decoherence in a Transmon Qubit

J. A. Schreier, S. M. Girvin, Robert J. Schoelkopf

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 12, 2008•0 citations

Investigating decoherence in the transmon qubit using a 3D resonator

Hanhee Paik, David Schuster, Lev S. Bishop +5 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 25, 2011•0 citations

Bulk and surface loss in superconducting transmon qubits

Oliver Dial, Douglas T McClure, Stefano Poletto +6 more

Abstract Decoherence of superconducting transmon qubits is purported to be consistent with surface loss from two-level systems on the substrate surface. Here, we present a study of surface loss in transmon devices, explicitly designed to have varying sensitivities to different surface loss contributors. Our experiments also encompass two particular different sapphire substrates, which reveal the onset of a yet unknown additional loss mechanism outside of surface loss for one of the substrates. Tests across different wafers and devices demonstrate substantial variation, and we emphasize the importance of testing large numbers of devices for disentangling different sources of decoherence.

arXiv:1509.03859•Superconductor Science and Technology•Mar 3, 2016•90 citations
Abstract Decoherence of superconducting transmon qubits is purported to be consistent with surface loss from two-level systems on the substrate surface. Here, we present a study of surface loss in transmon devices, explicitly designed to have varying sensitivities to different surface loss contributors. Our experiments also encompass two particular different sapphire substrates, which reveal the onset of a yet unknown additional loss mechanism outside of surface loss for one of the substrates. Tests across different wafers and devices demonstrate substantial variation, and we emphasize the importance of testing large numbers of devices for disentangling different sources of decoherence.