Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

There is No Systematic Effective Violation of Conservation Laws in Quantum Measurement

Jacques Mallah

Published Jul 11, 2002• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

There is No Systematic Predictable Effective Violation of Conservation Laws in Quantum Measurement

Jacques Mallah

•Jul 11, 2002•0 citations

A problem with the conservation law observed in macroscopic quantum phenomena is a consequence of violation of the correspondence principle

А. В. Никулов

arXiv:2410.14711•Chinese Journal of Physics•Sep 20, 2024•4 citations

There is No Violation of Conservation Laws in Quantum Measurement

Jacques Mallah

For some ideal quantum measurements, conservation laws would seem to be violated systematically. It is argued that the intrinsically non-"ideal" nature of quantum measurements rescues the conservation laws.

arXiv:quant-ph/0207071•Jul 11, 2002•1 citation

Conservation Laws and Quantum Measurement

Edward J. Gillis

•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

Conserved Quantities and Measurements

Edward J. Gillis

When a measurement is made on a system that is not in an eigenstate of the measured observable, it is often assumed that some conservation law has been violated. Discussions of the effect of measurements on conserved quantities often overlook the possibility of entanglement between the measured system and the preparation apparatus. The preparation of a system in any particular state necessarily involves interaction between the apparatus and the system. Since entanglement is a generic result of interaction, as shown by Gemmer and Mahler[1], and by Durt[2,3] one would expect some nonzero entanglement between apparatus and measured system, even though the amount of such entanglement is extremely small. Because the apparatus has an enormous number of degrees of freedom relative to the measured system, even a very tiny difference between the apparatus states that are correlated with the orthogonal states of the measured system can be sufficient to account for the perceived deviation from strict conservation of the quantity in question. Hence measurements need not violate conservation laws.

arXiv:2108.08342•Aug 18, 2021•0 citations

Conservation Laws in Quantum Theory

Niels Henrik David Bohr

Nature•Jul 1, 1936•45 citations
When a measurement is made on a system that is not in an eigenstate of the measured observable, it is often assumed that some conservation law has been violated. Discussions of the effect of measurements on conserved quantities often overlook the possibility of entanglement between the measured system and the preparation apparatus. The preparation of a system in any particular state necessarily involves interaction between the apparatus and the system. Since entanglement is a generic result of interaction, as shown by Gemmer and Mahler[1], and by Durt[2,3] one would expect some nonzero entanglement between apparatus and measured system, even though the amount of such entanglement is extremely small. Because the apparatus has an enormous number of degrees of freedom relative to the measured system, even a very tiny difference between the apparatus states that are correlated with the orthogonal states of the measured system can be sufficient to account for the perceived deviation from strict conservation of the quantity in question. Hence measurements need not violate conservation laws.