Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

AIP conference proceedings

Entanglement guides quantum computation

Arun Kumar Pati

Published Jan 1, 2006• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

Origin of the speed‐up in quantum algorithms is not yet fully understood. But there are indications that entanglement does play an important role in quantum computation. Algorithms that do not involve entanglement can be efficiently simulated on a classical computer. Here I make a simple observation. I show that infinitesimal change in multi‐particle pure product state always gives rise to an entangled state. During quantum computation even though at each time instant the state is not entangled, it does pass through entangled states at infinitesimal time steps. This applies to multi‐particle pure, pseudo‐pure and general mixed states as well. This suggests that even though unitary operators do not produce any entanglement, quantum entanglement guides the process of quantum computation.

DOI
10.1063/1.2400883

Related papers

On the role of entanglement in quantum-computational speed-up

Richard Jozsa, Noah Linden

For any quantum algorithm operating on pure states, we prove that the presence of multi‐partite entanglement, with a number of parties that increases unboundedly with input size, is necessary if the quantum algorithm is to offer an exponential speed‐up over classical computation. Furthermore, we prove that the algorithm can be efficiently simulated classically to within a prescribed tolerance η even if a suitably small amount of global entanglement is present. We explicitly identify the occurrence of increasing multi‐partite entanglement in Shor's algorithm. Our results do not apply to quantum algorithms operating on mixed states in general and we discuss the suggestion that an exponential computational speed‐up might be possible with mixed states in the total absence of entanglement. Finally, despite the essential role of entanglement for pure‐state algorithms, we argue that it is nevertheless misleading to view entanglement as a key resource for quantum‐computational power.

arXiv:quant-ph/0201143•Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Aug 8, 2003•839 citations

Infinitesimal change is a Non-local Operation: Hidden power of Quantum Entanglement

Arun Kumar Pati

We show that the global infinitesimal change in the multi-particle pure product state gives rise to an entangled state. This suggests that even if there is no interaction present between the subsystems, i.e., at each time instant the state is non-entangled, the tangent vector is typically entangled. Since the tangent space vectors tell the state-space vectors how to change this implies that quantum entanglement is necessary for motion or change in general. This is truly a `hidden power' of quantum entanglement. During quantum computation even though at each time instant the state is not entangled, quantum entanglement guides the process of computation. This observation applies to multi-particle pure, pseudo-pure and mixed states as well.

arXiv:quant-ph/0510133•Oct 18, 2005•0 citations

Superposition, entanglement and quantum computation

Tim Forcer, Tony Hey, Douglas Alan Ross +1 more

The paper examines the roles played by superposition and entanglement in quantum computing. The analysis is illustrated by discussion of a "classical" electronic implementation of Grover's quantum search algorithm. It is shown explicitly that the absence of multi-particle entanglement leads to exponentially rising resources for implementing such quantum algorithms.

Quantum Information and Computation•Feb 1, 2002•34 citations

Speed-up and entanglement in quantum searching

Samuel L. Braunstein, Arun Kumar Pati

We investigate the issue of speed-up and the necessity of entanglement in Grover's quantum search algorithm. We find that in a pure state implementation of Grover's algorithm entanglement is present even though the initial and target states are product states. In pseudo-pure state implementations, the separability of the states involved defines an entanglement boundary in terms of a bound on the purity parameter. Using this bound we investigate the necessity of entanglement in quantum searching for these pseudo-pure state implementations. If every active molecule involved in the ensemble is `charged for' then in existing machines speed-up without entanglement is not possible.

arXiv:quant-ph/0008018•Aug 3, 2000•2 citations

Speed-up and entanglement in quantum Searching

Samuel L. Braunstein, Arun Kumar Pati

We investigate the issue of speed-up and the necessity of entanglement in Grover's quantum search algorithm. We find that in a pure state implementation of Grover's algorithm entanglement is present even though the initial and target states are product states. In pseudo-pure state implementations, the separability of the states involved defines an entanglement boundary in terms of a bound on the purity parameter. Using this bound we investigate the necessity of entanglement in quantum searching for these pseudo-pure state implementations. If every active molecule involved in the ensemble is `charged for' then in existing machines speed-up without entanglement is not possible.

Quantum Information and Computation•Aug 1, 2002•14 citations

Role of entanglement and correlations in mixed-state quantum computation

Animesh Datta, Guifré Vidal

In a quantum computation with pure states, the generation of large amounts of entanglement is known to be necessary for a speedup with respect to classical computations. However, examples of quantum computations with mixed states are known, such as the deterministic computation with one quantum qubit (DQC1) model [Knill and Laflamme, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5672 (1998)], in which entanglement is at most marginally present, and yet a computational speedup is believed to occur. Correlations, and not entanglement, have been identified as a necessary ingredient for mixed-state quantum computation speedups. Here we show that correlations, as measured through the operator Schmidt rank, are indeed present in large amounts in the DQC1 circuit. This provides evidence for the preclusion of efficient classical simulation of DQC1 by means of a whole class of classical simulation algorithms, thereby reinforcing the conjecture that DQC1 leads to a genuine quantum computational speedup.

arXiv:quant-ph/0611157•Physical Review A•Apr 11, 2007•259 citations
Origin of the speed‐up in quantum algorithms is not yet fully understood. But there are indications that entanglement does play an important role in quantum computation. Algorithms that do not involve entanglement can be efficiently simulated on a classical computer. Here I make a simple observation. I show that infinitesimal change in multi‐particle pure product state always gives rise to an entangled state. During quantum computation even though at each time instant the state is not entangled, it does pass through entangled states at infinitesimal time steps. This applies to multi‐particle pure, pseudo‐pure and general mixed states as well. This suggests that even though unitary operators do not produce any entanglement, quantum entanglement guides the process of quantum computation.
For any quantum algorithm operating on pure states, we prove that the presence of multi‐partite entanglement, with a number of parties that increases unboundedly with input size, is necessary if the quantum algorithm is to offer an exponential speed‐up over classical computation. Furthermore, we prove that the algorithm can be efficiently simulated classically to within a prescribed tolerance η even if a suitably small amount of global entanglement is present. We explicitly identify the occurrence of increasing multi‐partite entanglement in Shor's algorithm. Our results do not apply to quantum algorithms operating on mixed states in general and we discuss the suggestion that an exponential computational speed‐up might be possible with mixed states in the total absence of entanglement. Finally, despite the essential role of entanglement for pure‐state algorithms, we argue that it is nevertheless misleading to view entanglement as a key resource for quantum‐computational power.
We show that the global infinitesimal change in the multi-particle pure product state gives rise to an entangled state. This suggests that even if there is no interaction present between the subsystems, i.e., at each time instant the state is non-entangled, the tangent vector is typically entangled. Since the tangent space vectors tell the state-space vectors how to change this implies that quantum entanglement is necessary for motion or change in general. This is truly a `hidden power' of quantum entanglement. During quantum computation even though at each time instant the state is not entangled, quantum entanglement guides the process of computation. This observation applies to multi-particle pure, pseudo-pure and mixed states as well.
We investigate the issue of speed-up and the necessity of entanglement in Grover's quantum search algorithm. We find that in a pure state implementation of Grover's algorithm entanglement is present even though the initial and target states are product states. In pseudo-pure state implementations, the separability of the states involved defines an entanglement boundary in terms of a bound on the purity parameter. Using this bound we investigate the necessity of entanglement in quantum searching for these pseudo-pure state implementations. If every active molecule involved in the ensemble is `charged for' then in existing machines speed-up without entanglement is not possible.
We investigate the issue of speed-up and the necessity of entanglement in Grover's quantum search algorithm. We find that in a pure state implementation of Grover's algorithm entanglement is present even though the initial and target states are product states. In pseudo-pure state implementations, the separability of the states involved defines an entanglement boundary in terms of a bound on the purity parameter. Using this bound we investigate the necessity of entanglement in quantum searching for these pseudo-pure state implementations. If every active molecule involved in the ensemble is `charged for' then in existing machines speed-up without entanglement is not possible.
In a quantum computation with pure states, the generation of large amounts of entanglement is known to be necessary for a speedup with respect to classical computations. However, examples of quantum computations with mixed states are known, such as the deterministic computation with one quantum qubit (DQC1) model [Knill and Laflamme, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5672 (1998)], in which entanglement is at most marginally present, and yet a computational speedup is believed to occur. Correlations, and not entanglement, have been identified as a necessary ingredient for mixed-state quantum computation speedups. Here we show that correlations, as measured through the operator Schmidt rank, are indeed present in large amounts in the DQC1 circuit. This provides evidence for the preclusion of efficient classical simulation of DQC1 by means of a whole class of classical simulation algorithms, thereby reinforcing the conjecture that DQC1 leads to a genuine quantum computational speedup.