Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Teaching Quantum Physics Without Paradoxes in Introductory Physics Courses

Art Hobson

Published Apr 24, 2006• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Teaching quantum theory in the introductory course

Art Hobson

The Physics Teacher•Apr 1, 1996•18 citations

Meeting the Challenge: Quantum Physics in Introductory Physics Courses

Ileana M. Greca, Olival Freire

Springer eBooks•Dec 30, 2013•18 citations

Electrons as field quanta: A better way to teach quantum physics in introductory general physics courses

Art Hobson

I propose a conceptual change in the way we teach nonrelativistic quantum physics in introductory survey courses and general modern physics courses. Traditional instruction treats radiation as a quantized electromagnetic wave that, because it is quantized, is observable only as discrete field quanta, while treating matter as particles that are accompanied by a wave function. In other words, traditional instruction views radiation as fundamentally a field phenomenon, and matter as fundamentally a particle phenomenon. But quantum field theory has a more unified view, according to which both radiation and matter are continuous fields while both photons and material particles are quanta of these fields. The quantum field theory view of radiation and matter clarifies particle identity issues, dispels students’ Newtonian misconceptions about matter, arguably resolves the wave-particle paradox, is the accepted view of contemporary physics, and might be the simplest and most effective teaching approach for all students. I propose that we make this field-theory viewpoint the conceptual basis for teaching non-relativistic quantum physics.

American Journal of Physics•Jun 14, 2005•36 citations

Teaching quantum computing in college level computer science programs: work in progress

Pradip Peter Dey, Bhaskar Raj Sinha, M. H. S. Amin

As quantum computers are becoming available for experiments, their enormous potential is being recognized among college communities. The goal of introducing quantum computing in college level computer science programs is becoming attractive. However, this goal comes with opportunities and challenges. of the challenges is that quantum computing appears to require substantial background in physics as well as in computer science. However, it is hard to convince students to major in these two fields. Computer Science students with a minor in physics can also be considered. Several alternative curriculum structures are possible. A non-consecutive two-course framework is proposed here. A course on Introduction to Quantum Computing may be offered to sophomore level students. This introductory course may teach fundamental ideas about quantum computing with basic concepts behind BQP (Bounded Error Quantum Polynomial) and related topics. This introductory course may be followed up by some physics courses (on related topics such as quantum mechanics) and some computer science courses. Then, a senior level course on Advanced Quantum Computing may be offered that may include some well-known algorithms (such as Shor's Algorithm for Quantum Factorization and Grover's Algorithm for Quantum Search) and their implementation and practices on some simulators (such as QuIDE from http://www.quide.eu/) or some prototype quantum processors (such as IBM's prototype quantum processors). For advanced level courses, some course materials are available from various sources (such as MIT OpenCourseWare). The greater challenge would be in teaching the introductory course mentioned earlier that motivates students towards investing time and efforts in learning quantum computing and related physics, math and computational topics. The challenges of teaching the introductory course should not be underestimated. Some flexible strategies can be suggested for this course so that the biggest challenges can be overcome. Some initial assessments of the students may help adjusting the introduction strategies with student's preparation. What is recommended is that the instructor should be able to adjust the coverage of topics, rigor and depth of treatment. That is, the introductory course should not be rigidly defined. It should be recognized that the main emphasis of the introductory course is actually instilling motivations and curiosity in student's mind about potentials of quantum computing through adaptive teaching of some selected topics where traditional digital computers do not provide tractable solutions. Ideally a balance could be achieved among aspects of depth of treatment, rigor, inspiration, motivation and coverage of topics. Students should be able to realize that the emerging quantum computing technology would be able to provide elegant solutions to some of the classical intractable problems combining ideas from physics, math and computer science in an innovative way. One size fits all is not a good approach and discussion of issues may help us face the challenges better by pragmatically considering a range of possible alternatives. Resources that are currently available may also need to be reviewed for the purpose of introducing quantum computing adequately.

Journal of computing sciences in colleges•Oct 1, 2018•0 citations

Mathematical Methodologies for Teaching Principles and Functionality of Quantum Computer in Physics-Based Courses

Huber Nieto-Chaupis

IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA)•May 1, 2026•0 citations

Teaching Quantum Physics Without Paradoxes

Art Hobson

Although the resolution to the wave-particle paradox has been known for 80 years,1,2 it is seldom presented. Briefly, the resolution is that material particles and photons are the quanta of extended spatially continuous but energetically quantized fields. But because the resolution resides in quantum field theory and is not usually spelled out in ordinary language, it is neither generally understood nor generally taught, especially not in the context of nonrelativistic quantum physics. The purpose of this paper is to provide that resolution and to suggest that we teach introductory quantum physics from this viewpoint.

The Physics Teacher•Jan 23, 2007•21 citations
I propose a conceptual change in the way we teach nonrelativistic quantum physics in introductory survey courses and general modern physics courses. Traditional instruction treats radiation as a quantized electromagnetic wave that, because it is quantized, is observable only as discrete field quanta, while treating matter as particles that are accompanied by a wave function. In other words, traditional instruction views radiation as fundamentally a field phenomenon, and matter as fundamentally a particle phenomenon. But quantum field theory has a more unified view, according to which both radiation and matter are continuous fields while both photons and material particles are quanta of these fields. The quantum field theory view of radiation and matter clarifies particle identity issues, dispels students’ Newtonian misconceptions about matter, arguably resolves the wave-particle paradox, is the accepted view of contemporary physics, and might be the simplest and most effective teaching approach for all students. I propose that we make this field-theory viewpoint the conceptual basis for teaching non-relativistic quantum physics.
As quantum computers are becoming available for experiments, their enormous potential is being recognized among college communities. The goal of introducing quantum computing in college level computer science programs is becoming attractive. However, this goal comes with opportunities and challenges. of the challenges is that quantum computing appears to require substantial background in physics as well as in computer science. However, it is hard to convince students to major in these two fields. Computer Science students with a minor in physics can also be considered. Several alternative curriculum structures are possible. A non-consecutive two-course framework is proposed here. A course on Introduction to Quantum Computing may be offered to sophomore level students. This introductory course may teach fundamental ideas about quantum computing with basic concepts behind BQP (Bounded Error Quantum Polynomial) and related topics. This introductory course may be followed up by some physics courses (on related topics such as quantum mechanics) and some computer science courses. Then, a senior level course on Advanced Quantum Computing may be offered that may include some well-known algorithms (such as Shor's Algorithm for Quantum Factorization and Grover's Algorithm for Quantum Search) and their implementation and practices on some simulators (such as QuIDE from http://www.quide.eu/) or some prototype quantum processors (such as IBM's prototype quantum processors). For advanced level courses, some course materials are available from various sources (such as MIT OpenCourseWare). The greater challenge would be in teaching the introductory course mentioned earlier that motivates students towards investing time and efforts in learning quantum computing and related physics, math and computational topics. The challenges of teaching the introductory course should not be underestimated. Some flexible strategies can be suggested for this course so that the biggest challenges can be overcome. Some initial assessments of the students may help adjusting the introduction strategies with student's preparation. What is recommended is that the instructor should be able to adjust the coverage of topics, rigor and depth of treatment. That is, the introductory course should not be rigidly defined. It should be recognized that the main emphasis of the introductory course is actually instilling motivations and curiosity in student's mind about potentials of quantum computing through adaptive teaching of some selected topics where traditional digital computers do not provide tractable solutions. Ideally a balance could be achieved among aspects of depth of treatment, rigor, inspiration, motivation and coverage of topics. Students should be able to realize that the emerging quantum computing technology would be able to provide elegant solutions to some of the classical intractable problems combining ideas from physics, math and computer science in an innovative way. One size fits all is not a good approach and discussion of issues may help us face the challenges better by pragmatically considering a range of possible alternatives. Resources that are currently available may also need to be reviewed for the purpose of introducing quantum computing adequately.
Although the resolution to the wave-particle paradox has been known for 80 years,1,2 it is seldom presented. Briefly, the resolution is that material particles and photons are the quanta of extended spatially continuous but energetically quantized fields. But because the resolution resides in quantum field theory and is not usually spelled out in ordinary language, it is neither generally understood nor generally taught, especially not in the context of nonrelativistic quantum physics. The purpose of this paper is to provide that resolution and to suggest that we teach introductory quantum physics from this viewpoint.