Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nature

Uncertainty in quantum theory

John Maddox

Published Apr 22, 1993• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1038/362693a0

Related papers

Uncertainty about quantum mechanics

Mark S. Madsen

Behavioral and Brain Sciences•Dec 1, 1990•0 citations

Entropic uncertainty relations in a class of generalized probabilistic theories

Ryo Takakura, Takayuki Miyadera

Abstract Entropic uncertainty relations play an important role in both fundamentals and applications of quantum theory. Although they have been well-investigated in quantum theory, little is known about entropic uncertainty in generalized probabilistic theories (GPTs). The current study explores two types of entropic uncertainty relations, preparation and measurement uncertainty relations, in a class of GPTs which can be considered generalizations of quantum theory. Not only a method for obtaining entropic preparation uncertainty relations but also an entropic measurement uncertainty relation similar to the quantum one by Buscemi et al (2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 050401) are proved in those theories. These results manifest that the entropic structure in the uncertainty relations is not restricted to quantum theory and therefore is universal one. Concrete calculations of our relations in GPTs called the regular polygon theories are also demonstrated.

arXiv:2006.05671•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jun 17, 2021•5 citations

Uncertainty and quantum mechanics

Tim Freegarde

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 8, 2012•0 citations

Agents in Quantum and Neural Uncertainty

Germano Resconi, Boris Kovalerchuk

This chapter models quantum and neural uncertainty using a concept of the Agent–based Uncertainty Theory (AUT). The AUT is based on complex fusion of crisp (non-fuzzy) conflicting judgments of agents. It provides a uniform representation and an operational empirical interpretation for several uncertainty theories such as rough set theory, fuzzy sets theory, evidence theory, and probability theory. The AUT models conflicting evaluations that are fused in the same evaluation context. This agent approach gives also a novel definition of the quantum uncertainty and quantum computations for quantum gates that are realized by unitary transformations of the state. In the AUT approach, unitary matrices are interpreted as logic operations in logic computations. We show that by using permutation operators any type of complex classical logic expression can be generated. With the quantum gate, we introduce classical logic into the quantum domain. This chapter connects the intrinsic irrationality of the quantum system and the non-classical quantum logic with the agents. We argue that AUT can help to find meaning for quantum superposition of non-consistent states. Next, this chapter shows that the neural fusion at the synapse can be modeled by the AUT in the same fashion. The neuron is modeled as an operator that transforms classical logic expressions into many-valued logic expressions. The motivation for such neural network is to provide high flexibility and logic adaptation of the brain model.Request access from your librarian to read this chapter's full text.

IGI Global eBooks•Sep 7, 2010•5 citations

Uncertainty relation and simultaneous measurements in quantum theory

Paul Busch

•May 15, 1982•0 citations

Preparation uncertainty implies measurement uncertainty in a class of generalized probabilistic theories

Ryo Takakura, Takayuki Miyadera

In quantum theory, it is known for a pair of noncommutative observables that there is no state on which they take simultaneously definite values and that there is no joint measurement of them. They are called preparation uncertainty and measurement uncertainty, respectively, and research has unveiled that they are not independent from but related with each other in a quantitative way. This study aims to reveal whether similar relations to quantum ones hold also in generalized probabilistic theories (GPTs). In particular, a certain class of GPTs is considered, which can be characterized by transitivity and self-duality and regarded as extensions of quantum theory. It is proved that there are close connections expressed quantitatively between two types of uncertainty on a pair observables also in those theories: if preparation uncertainty exists, then measurement uncertainty also exists, and they are described by similar inequalities. Our results manifest that their correspondences are not specific to quantum theory but more universal ones.

arXiv:2006.02092•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 2020•8 citations
Abstract Entropic uncertainty relations play an important role in both fundamentals and applications of quantum theory. Although they have been well-investigated in quantum theory, little is known about entropic uncertainty in generalized probabilistic theories (GPTs). The current study explores two types of entropic uncertainty relations, preparation and measurement uncertainty relations, in a class of GPTs which can be considered generalizations of quantum theory. Not only a method for obtaining entropic preparation uncertainty relations but also an entropic measurement uncertainty relation similar to the quantum one by Buscemi et al (2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 050401) are proved in those theories. These results manifest that the entropic structure in the uncertainty relations is not restricted to quantum theory and therefore is universal one. Concrete calculations of our relations in GPTs called the regular polygon theories are also demonstrated.
This chapter models quantum and neural uncertainty using a concept of the Agent–based Uncertainty Theory (AUT). The AUT is based on complex fusion of crisp (non-fuzzy) conflicting judgments of agents. It provides a uniform representation and an operational empirical interpretation for several uncertainty theories such as rough set theory, fuzzy sets theory, evidence theory, and probability theory. The AUT models conflicting evaluations that are fused in the same evaluation context. This agent approach gives also a novel definition of the quantum uncertainty and quantum computations for quantum gates that are realized by unitary transformations of the state. In the AUT approach, unitary matrices are interpreted as logic operations in logic computations. We show that by using permutation operators any type of complex classical logic expression can be generated. With the quantum gate, we introduce classical logic into the quantum domain. This chapter connects the intrinsic irrationality of the quantum system and the non-classical quantum logic with the agents. We argue that AUT can help to find meaning for quantum superposition of non-consistent states. Next, this chapter shows that the neural fusion at the synapse can be modeled by the AUT in the same fashion. The neuron is modeled as an operator that transforms classical logic expressions into many-valued logic expressions. The motivation for such neural network is to provide high flexibility and logic adaptation of the brain model.Request access from your librarian to read this chapter's full text.
In quantum theory, it is known for a pair of noncommutative observables that there is no state on which they take simultaneously definite values and that there is no joint measurement of them. They are called preparation uncertainty and measurement uncertainty, respectively, and research has unveiled that they are not independent from but related with each other in a quantitative way. This study aims to reveal whether similar relations to quantum ones hold also in generalized probabilistic theories (GPTs). In particular, a certain class of GPTs is considered, which can be characterized by transitivity and self-duality and regarded as extensions of quantum theory. It is proved that there are close connections expressed quantitatively between two types of uncertainty on a pair observables also in those theories: if preparation uncertainty exists, then measurement uncertainty also exists, and they are described by similar inequalities. Our results manifest that their correspondences are not specific to quantum theory but more universal ones.