Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Bose-Glass to Superfluid Transition in the 3d Boson Hubbard Model: z=d

Peter B. Hitchcock, Erik Schwartz Sørensen

Published Mar 14, 2006• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

The two-dimensional disordered Boson Hubbard model: Evidence for a direct Mott-insulator-to-superfluid transition and localization in the Bose glass phase

Jens Kisker, Heiko Rieger

arXiv:cond-mat/9703149•Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Dec 1, 1997•16 citations

Bogoliubov approach to superfluid-Bose glass phase transition of a disordered Bose-Hubbard model in weakly interacting regime

Botao Wang, Ying Jiang

arXiv:1512.05636•The European Physical Journal D•Nov 29, 2016•5 citations

The two-dimensional disordered Boson Hubbard model: Evidence for a direct Mott-insulator-to-superfluid transition and localization in the Bose glass phase

Jens Kisker, Heiko Rieger

We investigate the Bose glass phase and the insulator-to-superfluid transition in the two-dimensional disordered Boson Hubbard model in the Villain representation via Monte Carlo simulations. In the Bose glass phase the probability distribution of the local susceptibility is found to have a 1χ2 tail and the imaginary time Green's function decays algebraically C(τ) ≈ τ−1 giving rise to a divergent global susceptibility. By considering the participation ratio it is shown that the excitations in the Bose glass phase are fully localized and a scaling law is established. For commensurate Boson densities we find direct Mott insulator to superfluid transition without an intervening Bose glass phase for weak disorder. For this transition we obtain the critical exponents z = 1, v = 0.7 ± 0.1 and η = 0.1 ± 0.1, which agree with those for the classical three-dimensional XY model without disorder. This indicates that disorder is irrelevant at the tip of the Mott-lobes and that here the inequality v⩾2d is violated.

•Jan 1, 1997•8 citations

Mott-insulator-superfluid-liquid transition in a 1D boson Hubbard model

Владимир Федорович Елесин, V. А. Kashurnikov, L. А. Openov

•Aug 1, 1994•4 citations

Reentrant Superfluid-Insulator Transitions of Random Boson Hubbard Models

Naomichi Hatano

Superfluid-insulator transitions are studied for the ground state of the Boson Hubbard model with random potentials. The topology of the phase diagram is discussed. Reentrant transitions between the superfluid phase and the Bose-glass insulator phase are found in an arbitrary number of dimensions. The present results are based on a perturbational scaling argument and a quantum Monte Carlo calculation. The Monte Carlo algorithm is also reported in detail.

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•May 15, 1995•8 citations

Ramping through Superfluid-to-Mott transition in the Bose-Hubbard Model

Bernhard Wünsch, David Pekker, Takuya Kitagawa +2 more

APS•Mar 1, 2011•0 citations
We investigate the Bose glass phase and the insulator-to-superfluid transition in the two-dimensional disordered Boson Hubbard model in the Villain representation via Monte Carlo simulations. In the Bose glass phase the probability distribution of the local susceptibility is found to have a 1χ2 tail and the imaginary time Green's function decays algebraically C(τ) ≈ τ−1 giving rise to a divergent global susceptibility. By considering the participation ratio it is shown that the excitations in the Bose glass phase are fully localized and a scaling law is established. For commensurate Boson densities we find direct Mott insulator to superfluid transition without an intervening Bose glass phase for weak disorder. For this transition we obtain the critical exponents z = 1, v = 0.7 ± 0.1 and η = 0.1 ± 0.1, which agree with those for the classical three-dimensional XY model without disorder. This indicates that disorder is irrelevant at the tip of the Mott-lobes and that here the inequality v⩾2d is violated.