Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

AIP conference proceedings

Sum frequency generation spectroscopy of Rydberg states

A. Schnitzer, K. Hollenberg, Wolfgang Behmenburg

Published Jan 1, 1984• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1063/1.34688

Related papers

Continuously tunable sum-frequency generation involving Rydberg states

Robert W. Boyd, Daniel J. Gauthier, Jerzy S. Krasiński +1 more

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 1984•0 citations

A Novel Technique for Resonantly Enhanced Sum-Frequency Generation Involving Rydberg Atomic States

Daniel J. Gauthier, Jerzy S. Krasiński, Robert W. Boyd

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1984•1 citation

Sum-frequency generation involving-Rydberg atoms (A)

Jerzy S. Krasiński, Daniel J. Gauthier, Robert W. Boyd

Journal of the Optical Society of America A•Jan 1, 1983•0 citations

Continuously tunable sum-frequency generation involving sodium Rydberg states (A)

Robert W. Boyd, Daniel J. Gauthier, Jerzy S. Krasiński +1 more

Journal of the Optical Society of America B•Jan 1, 1984•0 citations

Spectroscopy of the Rydberg states in a two-frequency laser field

Д.Ф. Зарецкий, M. M. Yudkevich

OptSp•Jun 1, 1989•0 citations

Sum Frequency Generation Spectroscopy of Rydberg States

A. Schnitzer, K. Hollenberg, Wolfgang Behmenburg

Consider sum frequency generation (SFG) ω3 = 2 ω1 + ω2 in a phase matched metal-noble gas mixture, using two lasers ω1 and ω2, where 2 ω1 is tuned to a two photon transition Ωg2 and ω2 is shifted across Rydberg transitions Ω2n (g groundstate, 2 excited state, n Rydberg state of the metal atom). Then the intensity of the SFG spectrum I3 (ω3)~ |χ(3) (ω3)|2 displays resonances and related antiresonances, separated by (1) which are caused respectively by constructive and destructive interference of resonant and nonresonant parts of the 3. order nonlinear susceptibility χ(3) (ω3 ≃ Ωng) = χR(ω3)+ χNR (3) The products μ2nμng:= xn of the dipole transition matrix elements may then be obtained from a simple measurement of the frequency spacings Δωn at a large number of transitions Ωgn and solving iteratively the coupled equation system (1),(3); neither absolute radiation intensity nor vapour density deter mination is needed.

Topical Meeting on Laser Techniques in the Extreme Ultraviolet•Jan 1, 1984•0 citations
Consider sum frequency generation (SFG) ω3 = 2 ω1 + ω2 in a phase matched metal-noble gas mixture, using two lasers ω1 and ω2, where 2 ω1 is tuned to a two photon transition Ωg2 and ω2 is shifted across Rydberg transitions Ω2n (g groundstate, 2 excited state, n Rydberg state of the metal atom). Then the intensity of the SFG spectrum I3 (ω3)~ |χ(3) (ω3)|2 displays resonances and related antiresonances, separated by (1) which are caused respectively by constructive and destructive interference of resonant and nonresonant parts of the 3. order nonlinear susceptibility χ(3) (ω3 ≃ Ωng) = χR(ω3)+ χNR (3) The products μ2nμng:= xn of the dipole transition matrix elements may then be obtained from a simple measurement of the frequency spacings Δωn at a large number of transitions Ωgn and solving iteratively the coupled equation system (1),(3); neither absolute radiation intensity nor vapour density deter mination is needed.