Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nature

Localizing electrons in atomic orbits

John Maddox

Published Aug 25, 1994• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1038/370593a0

Related papers

Behavior of electrons in atoms

Journal of the Franklin Institute•Oct 1, 1964•3 citations

Density functional theory plus dynamical mean-field theory with natural atomic orbital projectors

Jae-Hoon Sim, Myung Joon Han

We introduce natural atomic orbitals as the local projector to define the correlated subspace for $\mathrm{DFT}+\mathrm{DMFT}$ (density functional theory plus dynamical mean-field theory) calculation. The natural atomic orbitals are found to be stably constructed against the number and the radius of basis orbitals. It can also be self-consistently updated inside the $\mathrm{DFT}+\mathrm{DMFT}$ loop. The spatial localization, electron occupation and the degree of correlation are investigated and compared with other conventional techniques. As a ``natural'' choice to describe the electron numbers, adopting natural atomic orbitals has advantage in terms of electron number counting. We further explore the reduction of computation cost by separating correlated orbitals into two subgroups based on the orbital occupancy. Our new recipe can serve as a useful choice for $\mathrm{DFT}+\mathrm{DMFT}$ and related methods.

arXiv:1912.12493•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Sep 25, 2019•5 citations

Rutherford atom in quantum theory

Maciej Kaliński, Joseph H. Eberly, J. A. West +1 more

We predict the existence of a self-sustained one-electron wave packet moving on a circular orbit in the helium atom. The wave packet is localized in space, but does not spread in time. This is a realization within quantum theory of a classical object that has been called a ``Rutherford atom,'' a localized planetary electron on an unquantized circular orbit under the influence of a massive charged core.

Physical Review A•Mar 10, 2003•26 citations

Dynamical localization and electron correlation

Takashi Hotta, Yasutami Takada

Czechoslovak Journal of Physics•May 1, 1996•2 citations

Non localization of free electrons

Gaston Casanova

Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras•Jun 1, 2000•0 citations

Sublinear-depth Quantum Simulation of Electrons with Atomic Orbitals

Jakob Günther, Aram W. Harrow

Discretizing electronic degrees of freedom into atomic orbitals is the default choice to accurately model electrons in molecules in a compact and flexible way. We consider the task of simulating such electronic structure models on a quantum computer for $N$ orbitals, keeping the number of orbitals per atom constant. Atomic orbitals give rise to Hamiltonians with potentially up to $\mathcal{O}(N^4)$ terms and little structure, which made it challenging to match the complexity of methods based on plane waves and real-space grids. In this work, we show that a Trotter step for atomic orbitals can be implemented in depth $\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{polylog}(N))$ without ancillas by combining a rigorous treatment of orbital localization, a hierarchical Hamiltonian decomposition based on the Fast Multipole Method, and shallow quantum Fourier arithmetic circuits. By bounding the Trotter error, we obtain sublinear simulation depth, and our total gate count $N^{5/3 + o(1)}$ matches the best scaling known for any basis.

quant-pharXiv:2610.00950•Oct 2, 2026•0 citations
We introduce natural atomic orbitals as the local projector to define the correlated subspace for DFT+DMFT\mathrm{DFT}+\mathrm{DMFT}DFT+DMFT (density functional theory plus dynamical mean-field theory) calculation. The natural atomic orbitals are found to be stably constructed against the number and the radius of basis orbitals. It can also be self-consistently updated inside the DFT+DMFT\mathrm{DFT}+\mathrm{DMFT}DFT+DMFT loop. The spatial localization, electron occupation and the degree of correlation are investigated and compared with other conventional techniques. As a ``natural'' choice to describe the electron numbers, adopting natural atomic orbitals has advantage in terms of electron number counting. We further explore the reduction of computation cost by separating correlated orbitals into two subgroups based on the orbital occupancy. Our new recipe can serve as a useful choice for DFT+DMFT\mathrm{DFT}+\mathrm{DMFT}DFT+DMFT and related methods.
Discretizing electronic degrees of freedom into atomic orbitals is the default choice to accurately model electrons in molecules in a compact and flexible way. We consider the task of simulating such electronic structure models on a quantum computer for NNN orbitals, keeping the number of orbitals per atom constant. Atomic orbitals give rise to Hamiltonians with potentially up to O(N4)\mathcal{O}(N^4)O(N4) terms and little structure, which made it challenging to match the complexity of methods based on plane waves and real-space grids. In this work, we show that a Trotter step for atomic orbitals can be implemented in depth O(polylog(N))\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{polylog}(N))O(polylog(N)) without ancillas by combining a rigorous treatment of orbital localization, a hierarchical Hamiltonian decomposition based on the Fast Multipole Method, and shallow quantum Fourier arithmetic circuits. By bounding the Trotter error, we obtain sublinear simulation depth, and our total gate count N5/3+o(1)N^{5/3 + o(1)}N5/3+o(1) matches the best scaling known for any basis.