Applied Physics Letters

Response to “Comment on ‘High Tc superconducting quantum interference devices made by ion irradiation’ ” [Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 136101 (2007)]

N. Bergeal, M. Sirena, Jérôme Lesueur, G. Faini, M. Aprili, J. P. Contour

Published Mar 26, 2007• 6 citations

Related papers

Comment on “High Tc superconducting quantum interference devices made by ion irradiation” [Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 112515 (2006)]

S.S. Tinchev

High superconducting quantum interference devices made by ion irradiation

Comment on ‘‘Temporal response of a high-c superconducting field-effect transistor’’ [Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 2076 (1995)]

Nelapatla Phani Chandrasekhar, Oriol T. Valls, Allen M. Goldman

High-T_c Superconducting Quantum Interference Device with Additional Positive Feedback

Akira Adachi, Kenichi Okajima, Youichi Takada +4 more

Evaluation of High-Tc Superconducting Quantum Interference Device with Alternating Current Bias DOIT and Additional Positive Feedback

Akira Adachi

Response to “Comment on ‘Adiabatically implementing quantum gates’” [J. Appl. Phys. 117, 156101 (2015)]

Jie Sun, Songfeng Lu, Fang Liu

Publisher's Note: “A perspective on superconducting flux qubits” [Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 080501 (2021)]

A. Yu. Dmitriev, O. V. Astafiev