Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Information and Computation

Rational approximations and quantum algorithms with postselection

Urmila Mahadev, Ronald de Wolf

Published Mar 1, 2015• 6 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We study the close connection between rational functions that approximate a given Boolean function, and quantum algorithms that compute the same function using postselection. We show that the minimal degree of the former equals (up to a factor of 2) the minimal query complexity of the latter. We give optimal (up to constant factors) quantum algorithms with postselection for the Majority function, slightly improving upon an earlier algorithm of Aaronson. Finally we show how Newman's classic theorem about low-degree rational approximation of the absolute-value function follows from these algorithms.

DOI
10.26421/qic15.3-4-5

Related papers

Rational approximations and quantum algorithms with postselection

Urmila Mahadev, Ronald de Wolf

We study the close connection between rational functions that approximate a given Boolean function, and quantum algorithms that compute the same function using postselection. We show that the minimal degree of the former equals (up to a factor of 2) the minimal query complexity of the latter. We give optimal (up to constant factors) quantum algorithms with postselection for the Majority function, slightly improving upon an earlier algorithm of Aaronson. Finally we show how Newman's classic theorem about low-degree rational approximation of the absolute-value function follows from these algorithms.

arXiv:1401.0912•Jan 5, 2014•0 citations

Post-selected Classical Query Complexity

Chris Cade

We study classical query algorithms with post-selection, and find that they are closely connected to rational functions with nonnegative coefficients. We show that the post-selected classical query complexity of a Boolean function is equal to the minimal degree of a rational function with nonnegative coefficients that approximates it (up to a factor of two). For post-selected quantum query algorithms, a similar relationship was shown by Mahadev and de Wolf, where the rational approximations are allowed to have negative coefficients. Using our characterisation, we find an exponentially large separation between post-selected classical query complexity and post-selected quantum query complexity, by proving a lower bound on the degree of rational approximations (with nonnegative coefficients) to the Majority function. This lower bound can be generalised to arbitrary symmetric functions, and allows us to find an unbounded separation between non-deterministic quantum and post-selected classical query complexity. All lower bounds carry over into the communication complexity setting. We show that the zero-error variants of post-selected query algorithms are equivalent to non-deterministic classical query algorithms, which in turn are characterised by nonnegative polynomials, and for some problems require exponentially more queries to the input than their bounded-error counterparts. Finally, we describe a post-selected query algorithm for approximating the Majority function, and an efficient query algorithm for approximate counting.

arXiv:1804.10010•Apr 26, 2018•1 citation

Algorithmic Polynomials

Alexander A. Sherstov

The approximate degree of a Boolean function $f(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n})$ is the minimum degree of a real polynomial that approximates $f$ pointwise within $1/3$. Upper bounds on approximate degree have a variety of applications in learning theory, differential privacy, and algorithm design in general. Nearly all known upper bounds on approximate degree arise in an existential manner from bounds on quantum query complexity. We develop a first-principles, classical approach to the polynomial approximation of Boolean functions. We use it to give the first constructive upper bounds on the approximate degree of several fundamental problems: - $O\bigl(n^{\frac{3}{4}-\frac{1}{4(2^{k}-1)}}\bigr)$ for the $k$-element distinctness problem; - $O(n^{1-\frac{1}{k+1}})$ for the $k$-subset sum problem; - $O(n^{1-\frac{1}{k+1}})$ for any $k$-DNF or $k$-CNF formula; - $O(n^{3/4})$ for the surjectivity problem. In all cases, we obtain explicit, closed-form approximating polynomials that are unrelated to the quantum arguments from previous work. Our first three results match the bounds from quantum query complexity. Our fourth result improves polynomially on the $Θ(n)$ quantum query complexity of the problem and refutes the conjecture by several experts that surjectivity has approximate degree $Ω(n)$. In particular, we exhibit the first natural problem with a polynomial gap between approximate degree and quantum query complexity.

arXiv:1801.04607•Jan 14, 2018•0 citations

Polynomials, Quantum Query Complexity, and Grothendieck's Inequality

Scott Aaronson, Andris Ambainis, Jānis Iraids +2 more

We show an equivalence between 1-query quantum algorithms and representations by degree-2 polynomials. Namely, a partial Boolean function f is computable by a 1-query quantum algorithm with error bounded by epsilon<1/2 iff f can be approximated by a degree-2 polynomial with error bounded by epsilon'<1/2. This result holds for two different notions of approximation by a polynomial: the standard definition of Nisan and Szegedy and the approximation by block-multilinear polynomials recently introduced by Aaronson and Ambainis [Aaronson/Ambainis, STOC 2015]. The proof uses Grothendieck's inequality to relate two matrix norms, with one norm corresponding to polynomial approximations and the other norm corresponding to quantum algorithms. We also show two results for polynomials of higher degree. First, there is a total Boolean function which requires ~Omega(n) quantum queries but can be represented by a block-multilinear polynomial of degree ~O(sqrt(n)). Thus, in the general case (for an arbitrary number of queries), block-multilinear polynomials are not equivalent to quantum algorithms. Second, for any constant degree k, the two notions of approximation by a polynomial (the standard and the block-multilinear) are equivalent. As a consequence, we solve an open problem from [Aaronson/Ambainis, STOC 2015], showing that one can estimate the value of any bounded degree-k polynomial p:{0,1}^n -> [-1,1] with O(n^{1-1/(2k)) queries.

arXiv:1511.08682•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Nov 27, 2015•16 citations

How Low Can Approximate Degree and Quantum Query Complexity be for Total Boolean Functions?

Andris Ambainis, Ronald de Wolf

It has long been known that any Boolean function that depends on n input variables has both degree and exact quantum query complexity of Omega(log n), and that this bound is achieved for some functions. In this paper we study the case of approximate degree and bounded-error quantum query complexity. We show that for these measures the correct lower bound is Omega(log n / loglog n), and we exhibit quantum algorithms for two functions where this bound is achieved.

arXiv:1206.0717•Jun 4, 2012•0 citations

How Low Can Approximate Degree and Quantum Query Complexity Be for Total Boolean Functions?

Andris Ambainis, Ronald de Wolf

It has long been known that any Boolean function that depends on n input variables has both degree and exact quantum query complexity of Omega(log n), and that this bound is achieved for some functions. In this paper we study the case of approximate degree and bounded-error quantum query complexity. We show that for these measures the correct lower bound is Omega(log n/log log n), and we exhibit quantum algorithms for two functions where this bound is achieved.

IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC)•Jun 1, 2013•3 citations
We study the close connection between rational functions that approximate a given Boolean function, and quantum algorithms that compute the same function using postselection. We show that the minimal degree of the former equals (up to a factor of 2) the minimal query complexity of the latter. We give optimal (up to constant factors) quantum algorithms with postselection for the Majority function, slightly improving upon an earlier algorithm of Aaronson. Finally we show how Newman's classic theorem about low-degree rational approximation of the absolute-value function follows from these algorithms.
We study the close connection between rational functions that approximate a given Boolean function, and quantum algorithms that compute the same function using postselection. We show that the minimal degree of the former equals (up to a factor of 2) the minimal query complexity of the latter. We give optimal (up to constant factors) quantum algorithms with postselection for the Majority function, slightly improving upon an earlier algorithm of Aaronson. Finally we show how Newman's classic theorem about low-degree rational approximation of the absolute-value function follows from these algorithms.
We study classical query algorithms with post-selection, and find that they are closely connected to rational functions with nonnegative coefficients. We show that the post-selected classical query complexity of a Boolean function is equal to the minimal degree of a rational function with nonnegative coefficients that approximates it (up to a factor of two). For post-selected quantum query algorithms, a similar relationship was shown by Mahadev and de Wolf, where the rational approximations are allowed to have negative coefficients. Using our characterisation, we find an exponentially large separation between post-selected classical query complexity and post-selected quantum query complexity, by proving a lower bound on the degree of rational approximations (with nonnegative coefficients) to the Majority function. This lower bound can be generalised to arbitrary symmetric functions, and allows us to find an unbounded separation between non-deterministic quantum and post-selected classical query complexity. All lower bounds carry over into the communication complexity setting. We show that the zero-error variants of post-selected query algorithms are equivalent to non-deterministic classical query algorithms, which in turn are characterised by nonnegative polynomials, and for some problems require exponentially more queries to the input than their bounded-error counterparts. Finally, we describe a post-selected query algorithm for approximating the Majority function, and an efficient query algorithm for approximate counting.
The approximate degree of a Boolean function f(x1,x2,…,xn)f(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n})f(x1​,x2​,…,xn​) is the minimum degree of a real polynomial that approximates fff pointwise within 1/31/31/3. Upper bounds on approximate degree have a variety of applications in learning theory, differential privacy, and algorithm design in general. Nearly all known upper bounds on approximate degree arise in an existential manner from bounds on quantum query complexity. We develop a first-principles, classical approach to the polynomial approximation of Boolean functions. We use it to give the first constructive upper bounds on the approximate degree of several fundamental problems: - O(n34−14(2k−1))O\bigl(n^{\frac{3}{4}-\frac{1}{4(2^{k}-1)}}\bigr)O(n43​−4(2k−1)1​) for the kkk-element distinctness problem; - O(n1−1k+1)O(n^{1-\frac{1}{k+1}})O(n1−k+11​) for the kkk-subset sum problem; - O(n1−1k+1)O(n^{1-\frac{1}{k+1}})O(n1−k+11​) for any kkk-DNF or kkk-CNF formula; - O(n3/4)O(n^{3/4})O(n3/4) for the surjectivity problem. In all cases, we obtain explicit, closed-form approximating polynomials that are unrelated to the quantum arguments from previous work. Our first three results match the bounds from quantum query complexity. Our fourth result improves polynomially on the Θ(n)Θ(n)Θ(n) quantum query complexity of the problem and refutes the conjecture by several experts that surjectivity has approximate degree Ω(n)Ω(n)Ω(n). In particular, we exhibit the first natural problem with a polynomial gap between approximate degree and quantum query complexity.
We show an equivalence between 1-query quantum algorithms and representations by degree-2 polynomials. Namely, a partial Boolean function f is computable by a 1-query quantum algorithm with error bounded by epsilon<1/2 iff f can be approximated by a degree-2 polynomial with error bounded by epsilon'<1/2. This result holds for two different notions of approximation by a polynomial: the standard definition of Nisan and Szegedy and the approximation by block-multilinear polynomials recently introduced by Aaronson and Ambainis [Aaronson/Ambainis, STOC 2015]. The proof uses Grothendieck's inequality to relate two matrix norms, with one norm corresponding to polynomial approximations and the other norm corresponding to quantum algorithms. We also show two results for polynomials of higher degree. First, there is a total Boolean function which requires ~Omega(n) quantum queries but can be represented by a block-multilinear polynomial of degree ~O(sqrt(n)). Thus, in the general case (for an arbitrary number of queries), block-multilinear polynomials are not equivalent to quantum algorithms. Second, for any constant degree k, the two notions of approximation by a polynomial (the standard and the block-multilinear) are equivalent. As a consequence, we solve an open problem from [Aaronson/Ambainis, STOC 2015], showing that one can estimate the value of any bounded degree-k polynomial p:{0,1}^n -> [-1,1] with O(n^{1-1/(2k)) queries.