Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Inference of Schr\"{o}dinger Equation from Classical-Mechanics Solution

J. X. Zheng-Johansson, Pär I. Johansson

Published Mar 13, 2006• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Inference of Schrodinger Equation from Classical Wave Mechanics[1]

Pär I. Johansson, J. X. Zheng-Johansson

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 23, 2005•0 citations

Eliminating remnants of classical mechanics and the birth of the Schr\"odinger equation

Wolfgang P. Schleich, Daniel M. Greenberger, Donald H. Kobe

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 22, 2011•1 citation

Inference of Schrödinger's Equation from Classical-Mechanical Solution

J. X. Zheng-Johansson, Johansson, P-I.

We set up the classical wave equation for a particle formed of an oscillatory zero-rest-mass charge together with its resulting electromagnetic waves, traveling in a potential field $V$ in a susceptible vacuum. The waves are Doppler-displaced upon the source motion, and superpose into a total, traveling- and in turn a standing- beat wave, or de Broglie phase wave, described by a corresponding total classical wave equation. By back-substitution of the explicitly known total, standing beat wave function and upon appropriate reductions at classic-velocity limit, we separate out from the total a component wave equation describing the kinetic motion of particle, which is equivalent to the Schrödinger equation. The Schrödinger wave function follows to be the envelope function of the standing beat wave at classic-velocity limit.

arXiv:physics/0411134•Nov 15, 2004•2 citations

Schr\"{o}dinger Equation from Hamilton-Jacobi Equation

Donald H. Kobe

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Oct 22, 2010•0 citations

Schrodinger Equation cannot Describe Transition Processes

Junhao, Z.

In this paper we prove the following: (1) The basic error of time-dependent perturbation theory is using the sum of first finite order of perturbed solutions to substitute the exact solution in the divergent interval of the series for calculating the transition probability. In addition quantum mechanics neglects the influence of the normality condition in the continuous case. In both cases Fermi golden rule is not a mathematically reasonable deductive inference from the Schrodinger equation. (2) The transition probability per unit time deduced from the exact solution of the Schrodinger equation is zero, which cannot be used to describe the transition processes.

arXiv:physics/0101049•Jan 9, 2001•0 citations

New Analytic Solutions of Schr\"{o}dinger's Equation in Time and Space

Hichem Eleuch, Yuri V. Rostovtsev, Marlan O. Scully

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 16, 2010•0 citations
We set up the classical wave equation for a particle formed of an oscillatory zero-rest-mass charge together with its resulting electromagnetic waves, traveling in a potential field VVV in a susceptible vacuum. The waves are Doppler-displaced upon the source motion, and superpose into a total, traveling- and in turn a standing- beat wave, or de Broglie phase wave, described by a corresponding total classical wave equation. By back-substitution of the explicitly known total, standing beat wave function and upon appropriate reductions at classic-velocity limit, we separate out from the total a component wave equation describing the kinetic motion of particle, which is equivalent to the Schrödinger equation. The Schrödinger wave function follows to be the envelope function of the standing beat wave at classic-velocity limit.
In this paper we prove the following: (1) The basic error of time-dependent perturbation theory is using the sum of first finite order of perturbed solutions to substitute the exact solution in the divergent interval of the series for calculating the transition probability. In addition quantum mechanics neglects the influence of the normality condition in the continuous case. In both cases Fermi golden rule is not a mathematically reasonable deductive inference from the Schrodinger equation. (2) The transition probability per unit time deduced from the exact solution of the Schrodinger equation is zero, which cannot be used to describe the transition processes.