Cambridge University Press eBooks

The Dirac Equation

Theodore Frankel

Published Nov 24, 2003• 0 citations

Abstract

Spin is what makes the world go 'round. The Groups SO (3) and SU (2) How does SU(2) act on its Lie algebra? For physical and mathematical motivation for this section (which involves nonrelativistic quantum mechanics) we refer the reader to some remarks of Feynman and of Weyl. Specifically, Feynman, in his section entitled “Degeneracy,” shows that a process involving a specific choice of direction in space requires that the process be described not by a single wave function ψ but rather by a multicomponent column vector of wave functions Ψ = (ψ 1 , …, ψ N ) T . He then indicates, roughly speaking, that since the physics cannot depend on the choice of cartesian coordinates ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) of space, the N -tuples must transform under some representation ρ: SO (3) → U ( N ) of the rotation group SO (3) of space. This is not quite accurate; since e i γ Ψ represents the same wave function (when γ is a constant), ρ is only a “ray” representation, ρ( g )ρ( h ) = e i γ( g,h ) ρ( gh ) for a function γ( g, h ). Weyl shows that this can be made into a genuine representation, except that it is (perhaps) double-valued. We shall show in this section that there is a natural 2 : 1 homomorphism π of the special unitary group SU (2) onto SO (3), thus yielding a (perhaps double valued) representation of SU (2) into U ( N ).

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511817977.022

Related papers

Why spinors do not form a vector space

G. Coddens

Spinors ψj of SU(2) represent group elements, i.e. three-dimensional rotations Rj , because they are shorthands of SU(2) representation matrices Rj obtained by taking their first columns. We explain that making linear combinations of spinors of SU(2) is feasible algebraically but geometrically meaningless. E.g. ψ1 + ψ2 ∈ C 2 would have to correspond to R1 + R2. But in SO(3), R1 + R2 would be a function that transforms r ∈ R 3 into R1(r) + R2(r), while in SU(2) it would correspond to a different function that is up to a multiplication constant equal to S : r → S(r) = R1(r) + R2(r) + 2 [ cos(ϕ1/2) cos(ϕ2/2) − s1•s2 ] r + 2 sin(ϕ1/2) sin(ϕ2/2)[ (s2•r) s1 + (s1•r) s2 ] + 2 sin(ϕ1/2) cos(ϕ2/2)(s1 ∧ r) + 2 cos(ϕ1/2) sin(ϕ2/2)(s2 ∧ r). The multiplication constant must be chosen such that |r| is preserved. Such extensions by linear combinations for spinors from a manifold to an embedding vector space are therefore mindless algebra with a spurious, conceptually impenetrable geometrical counterpart. This should not surprise anybody because the group axioms only define products of group elements, not linear combinations of them. Redefining spinors as vectors of a Hilbert space is therefore a purely formal, would-be scholar generalization.

Jul 19, 20210 citations

The basic physical Lie operations

Heinrich Saller

Quantum theory can be formulated as a theory of operations, more specific, of complex represented operations from real Lie groups. Hilbert space eigenvectors of acting Lie operations are used as states or particles. The simplest simple Lie groups have three dimensions. These groups together with their contractions and subgroups contain - in the simplest form - all physically important operations which come as translations for causal time, for space and for spacetime, as rotations, Lorentz transformations and as Euclidean and Poincare transformations with scattering and particle states and also - via the Heisenberg groups - as the operational structure of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. The classification of all those groups and their contractions is given together with their Hilbert spaces, constituted by energy-momentum functions. The groups representation matrix elements can be written as residues of energy-momentum poles - simple poles for abelian translations, e.g. in Feynman propagators, and dipoles for simple Lie group operations, e.g. in the Schroedinger wave functions for the nonrelativistic hydrogen atom.

arXiv:hep-th/0410147Oct 13, 20046 citations

The Geometrical Meaning of Spinors Lights the Way to Make Sense of Quantum Mechanics

G. Coddens

This paper aims at explaining that a key to understanding quantum mechanics (QM) is a perfect geometrical understanding of the spinor algebra that is used in its formulation. Spinors occur naturally in the representation theory of certain symmetry groups. The spinors that are relevant for QM are those of the homogeneous Lorentz group SO(3,1) in Minkowski space-time R4 and its subgroup SO(3) of the rotations of three-dimensional Euclidean space R3. In the three-dimensional rotation group, the spinors occur within its representation SU(2). We will provide the reader with a perfect intuitive insight about what is going on behind the scenes of the spinor algebra. We will then use the understanding that is acquired to derive the free-space Dirac equation from scratch, proving that it is a description of a statistical ensemble of spinning electrons in uniform motion, completely in the spirit of Ballentine’s statistical interpretation of QM. This is a mathematically rigorous proof. Developing this further, we allow for the presence of an electromagnetic field. We can consider the result as a reconstruction of QM based on the geometrical understanding of the spinor algebra. By discussing a number of problems in the interpretation of the conventional approach, we illustrate how this new approach leads to a better understanding of QM.

SymmetryApr 12, 20214 citations

Representations of the Weyl group and Wigner functions for SU(3)

DAVID J. ROWE, Barry C. Sanders, Hubert de Guise

Bases for SU(3) irreps are constructed on a space of three-particle tensor products of two-dimensional harmonic oscillator wave functions. The Weyl group is represented as the symmetric group of permutations of the particle coordinates of these spaces. Wigner functions for SU(3) are expressed as products of SU(2) Wigner functions and matrix elements of Weyl transformations. The constructions make explicit use of dual reductive pairs which are shown to be particularly relevant to problems in optics and quantum interferometry.

arXiv:math-ph/9811012Journal of Mathematical PhysicsJul 1, 199966 citations

The geometrical meaning of spinors as a key to make sense of quantum mechanics

G. Coddens

This paper aims at explaining that the key to understanding quantum mechanics (QM) is a perfect geometrical understanding of the spinor algebra that is used in its formulation. Spinors occur naturally in the representation theory of certain symmetry groups. The spinors that are relevant for QM are those of the homogeneous Lorentz group SO(3,1) in Minkowski space-time R 4 and its subgroup SO(3) of the rotations of three-dimensional Euclidean space R 3. In the three-dimensional rotation group the spinors occur within its representation SU(2). We will provide the reader with a perfect intuitive insight about what is going on behind the scenes of the spinor algebra. We will then use the understanding acquired to derive the free-space Dirac equation from scratch proving that it is a description of a statistical ensemble of spinning electrons in uniform motion, completely in the spirit of Ballentine's statistical interpretation of QM. This is a mathematically rigorous proof. Developing this further we allow for the presence of an electromagnetic field. We can consider the result as a reconstruction of QM based on the geometrical understanding of the spinor algebra. By discussing a number of problems in the interpretation of the conventional approach, we illustrate how this new approach leads to a better understanding of QM.

Mar 22, 20211 citation

Description of the Electron in the Electromagnetic Field: The Dirac Type Equation and the Equation for the Wave Function in Spinor Coordinate Space

Pavel Gorev

Physical processes are usually described using four-dimensional vector quantities - coordinate vector, momentum vector, current vector. But at the fundamental level they are characterized by spinors - coordinate spinors, momentum spinors, spinor wave functions. The propagation of fields and their interaction takes place at the spinor level, and since each spinor uniquely corresponds to a certain vector, the results of physical processes appear before us in vector form. For example, the relativistic Schrödinger equation and the Dirac equation are formulated by means of coordinate vectors, momentum vectors and quantum operators corresponding to them. In the Dirac equation the wave function is a spinor with complex components, but still coordinates and momentum are vectors. For a closed description of nature using only spinor quantities, it is necessary to have an equation similar to the Dirac equation in which momentum, coordinates and operators are spinors. It is such an equation that is presented in this paper. Using the example of the interaction between an electron and an electromagnetic field, we can see that the spinor equation contains more detailed information about the interaction than the vector equations. This is not new for quantum mechanics, since it describes interactions using complex wave functions, which cannot be observed directly, and only when measured goes to probabilities in the form of squares of the moduli of the wave functions. In the same way spinor quantities are not observable, but they completely determine observable vectors. In Section 2 of the paper, we analyze the quadratic form for an arbitrary four-component complex vector based on Pauli matrices. The form is invariant with respect to Lorentz transformations including any rotations and boosts. The invariance of the form allows us to construct on its basis an equation for a free particle combining the properties of the relativistic wave equation and the Dirac equation. For an electron in the presence of an electromagnetic potential it is shown that taking into account the commutation relations between the momentum and coordinate components allows us to obtain from this equation the known results describing the interactions of the electron spin with the electric and magnetic field. In the presence of a potential the momentum components cease to commute with each other. To neutralize this effect, the Schrödinger equation is supplemented by several equations with mixed partial derivatives on coordinates. In section 3 of the paper this quadratic form is expressed through momentum spinors, which makes it possible to obtain an equation for the spinor wave function in spinor coordinate space by replacing the momentum spinor components by partial derivative operators on the corresponding coordinate spinor component. Section 4 presents a modification of the theory of the path integral, which consists in considering the path integral in the spinor coordinate space. The Lagrangian densities for the scalar field and for the electron field, along with their corresponding propagators, are presented. An equation of motion for the electron is proposed that is relativistically invariant. This novel equation permitted the construction of an actually invariant procedure for the second quantization of the fermion field in spinor coordinate space. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the field operators are a combination of plane waves in spinor or vector space, with the coefficients of which being pseudospinors or pseudovectors. Each of these pseudovectors or pseudospinors corresponds to one of the particles presented in the theory of electrodynamics. Furthermore, each plane wave possesses an additional coefficient in the form of a creation or annihilation operator. In vector space, these operators commute, whereas in spinor space they anticommutate. The paper presents the spinor and vector representations of the field operators in explicit form, comprising sets of 16 pseudospinors or 4 pseudovectors corresponding to particles represented in electrodynamics. An explicit form of the symmetric traceless tensor with spin two, zero mass and two polarizations is presented, which can serve as a model of the graviton. The results obtained may prompt changes in some aspects of the construction of Feynman diagrams. Among other things, it presents a purely mathematical derivation of Maxwell's inhomogeneous equations without reference to empirical data on the action of electric current, which is usually referred to when deriving equations. Section 4 presents Einstein's inhomogeneous equation, which features the Riemann tensor rather than the Ricci tensor, with the energy-momentum tensor of a charged particle having four indices rather than two. In the case where a particle of matter has a charge, another Riemann tensor is added to Einstein’s equation, in addition to the usual Riemann curvature tensor, which describes the additional curvature created for a charged particle by an electromagnetic field.

Mar 25, 20260 citations