List of Figures. List of Tables. Preface. Acknowledgements. I: Mathematical and Physical Background. Introduction. 1. The mathematical scenario of quantum theory and von Neumann's axiomatization. 1.1. Algebraic structures. 1.2. The geometry of quantum theory. 1.3. The axiomatization of orthodox QT. 1.4. The 'logic' of the quantum events. 1.5. The logico-algebraic approach to QT. 2. Abstract axiomatic foundations of sharp QT. 2.1. Mackey's minimal axiomatization of QT. 2.2. Events. 2.3. Event-state systems. 2.4. Event-state systems and preclusivity spaces. 3. Back to Hilbert space. 3.1. Events as closed subspaces. 3.2. Events as projections. 3.3. Hilbert event-state systems. 3.4. From abstract orthoposets of events to Hilbert lattices. 4. The emergence of fuzzy events in Hilbert space quantum theory. 4.1. The notion of effect. 4.2. Effect-Brouwer Zadeh posets. 4.3. MacNeille completions. 4.4. Unsharp preclusivity spaces. 5. Effect algebras and quantum MV algebras. 5.1. Effect algebras and Brouwer Zadeh effect algebras. 5.2. The Lukasiewwicz operations. 5.3. MV algebras and QMV algebras. 5.4. Quasi-linear QMV algebras and effect algebras. 6. Abstract axiomatic foundations of unsharp quantum theory. 6.1. A minimal axiomatization of unsharp QT. 6.2. The algebraic structure of abstract effects. 6.3. The sharply dominating principle. 6.4. Abstract unsharp preclusivity spaces. 6.5. Sharp and unsharp abstract quantum theory. 7. To what extent is quantum ambiguity ambiguous? 7.1. Algebraic notions of 'sharp'. 7.2. Probabilistic definitions of 'sharpness'. II: Quantum Logics as Logic. Introduction. 8. Sharp quantum logics. 8.1. Algebraic and Kripkean semantics for sharp quantum logics. 8.2. Algebraic and Kripkean realizations of Hilbert event-state systems. 8.3. The implication problem in quantum logic. 8.4. Five polynomial conditions. 8.5. The quantum logical conditional as a counterfactual conditional. 8.6. Implication-connectives. 9. Metalogical properties and anomalies of quantum logic. 9.1. The failure of the Lindenbaum properety. 9.2. A modal interpretation of sharp quantum logics. 10. An axiomatization of OL and OQL. 10.1. The calculi of OL and OQL. 10.2. The soundness and completeness theorems. 11. The metalogical intractability of orthomodularity. 11.1. Orthomodularity is not elementary. 11.2. The embeddability problem. 11.3. Hilbert quantum logic and the orthomodular law. 12. First-order quantum logics and quantum set theories. 12.1. First-order semantics. 12.2. Quantum set theories. 13. Partial classical logic, the Lindenbaum property and the hidden variable problem. 13.1. Partial classical logic. 13.2. Partial classical logic and the Lindenbaum property. 13.3. States on partial Boolean algebras. 13.4. The Lindenbaum property and the hidden variable problem. 14. Unsharp quantum logics. 14.1.
List of Figures. List of Tables. Preface. Acknowledgements. I: Mathematical and Physical Background. Introduction. 1. The mathematical scenario of quantum theory and von Neumann's axiomatization. 1.1. Algebraic structures. 1.2. The geometry of quantum theory. 1.3. The axiomatization of orthodox QT. 1.4. The 'logic' of the quantum events. 1.5. The logico-algebraic approach to QT. 2. Abstract axiomatic foundations of sharp QT. 2.1. Mackey's minimal axiomatization of QT. 2.2. Events. 2.3. Event-state systems. 2.4. Event-state systems and preclusivity spaces. 3. Back to Hilbert space. 3.1. Events as closed subspaces. 3.2. Events as projections. 3.3. Hilbert event-state systems. 3.4. From abstract orthoposets of events to Hilbert lattices. 4. The emergence of fuzzy events in Hilbert space quantum theory. 4.1. The notion of effect. 4.2. Effect-Brouwer Zadeh posets. 4.3. MacNeille completions. 4.4. Unsharp preclusivity spaces. 5. Effect algebras and quantum MV algebras. 5.1. Effect algebras and Brouwer Zadeh effect algebras. 5.2. The Lukasiewwicz operations. 5.3. MV algebras and QMV algebras. 5.4. Quasi-linear QMV algebras and effect algebras. 6. Abstract axiomatic foundations of unsharp quantum theory. 6.1. A minimal axiomatization of unsharp QT. 6.2. The algebraic structure of abstract effects. 6.3. The sharply dominating principle. 6.4. Abstract unsharp preclusivity spaces. 6.5. Sharp and unsharp abstract quantum theory. 7. To what extent is quantum ambiguity ambiguous? 7.1. Algebraic notions of 'sharp'. 7.2. Probabilistic definitions of 'sharpness'. II: Quantum Logics as Logic. Introduction. 8. Sharp quantum logics. 8.1. Algebraic and Kripkean semantics for sharp quantum logics. 8.2. Algebraic and Kripkean realizations of Hilbert event-state systems. 8.3. The implication problem in quantum logic. 8.4. Five polynomial conditions. 8.5. The quantum logical conditional as a counterfactual conditional. 8.6. Implication-connectives. 9. Metalogical properties and anomalies of quantum logic. 9.1. The failure of the Lindenbaum properety. 9.2. A modal interpretation of sharp quantum logics. 10. An axiomatization of OL and OQL. 10.1. The calculi of OL and OQL. 10.2. The soundness and completeness theorems. 11. The metalogical intractability of orthomodularity. 11.1. Orthomodularity is not elementary. 11.2. The embeddability problem. 11.3. Hilbert quantum logic and the orthomodular law. 12. First-order quantum logics and quantum set theories. 12.1. First-order semantics. 12.2. Quantum set theories. 13. Partial classical logic, the Lindenbaum property and the hidden variable problem. 13.1. Partial classical logic. 13.2. Partial classical logic and the Lindenbaum property. 13.3. States on partial Boolean algebras. 13.4. The Lindenbaum property and the hidden variable problem. 14. Unsharp quantum logics. 14.1.
This paper examines how logical structures represent sharp and unsharp propositions in classical and quantum systems. Classical sharp logic is modeled by Boolean algebras, where propositions have bivalent truth values, complements are globally defined, and distributivity holds. Quantum sharp logic is modeled by orthomodular lattices of closed Hilbert-space subspaces or projection operators; it retains definite yes–no outcomes for ideal measurements but rejects the Boolean assumptions of global truth valuation and distributivity. Classical unsharp logic uses fuzzy membership or probabilistic truth values to describe vagueness and incomplete information, whereas quantum unsharp logic is expressed through effects and effect algebras, which capture noisy, inefficient, and generalized measurements. The paper’s central question is which algebraic structure is appropriate for each combination of classical or quantum behavior and sharp or unsharp measurement. The analysis shows that the four cases form a coherent hierarchy: Boolean algebras describe deterministic classical events, orthomodular lattices describe ideal quantum propositions, fuzzy or probabilistic models describe classical partial truth, and effect algebras describe realistic quantum effects. This classification clarifies the mathematical and physical role of unsharpness and explains why effect algebras are needed beyond projection-based quantum logic.
Since Birkhoff and von Neumann [2] a new area of logical investigation has grown up under the name of quantum logic. However it seems to me that many authors have been inclined to discuss algebraic semantics as such (mainly lattices of a certain kind) almost directly without presenting any axiomatic system, far from developing any proof theory of quantum logic. See, e.g., Gunson [9], Jauch [10], Varadarajan [15], Zeirler [16], etc. In this sense many works presented under the name of quantum logic are algebraic in essence rather than genuinely logical, though it is absurd to doubt the close relationship between algebraic and logical study on quantum mechanics. The main purpose of this paper is to alter this situation by presenting an axiomatization of quantum logic as natural and as elegant as possible, which further proof-theoretical study is to be based on. It is true that several axiomatizations of quantum logic are present now. Several authors have investigated the so-called material implication α → β ( = ¬α∨(α ∧ β)) very closely with due regard to its importance. See, e.g., Finch [5], Piziak [11], etc. Indeed material implication plays a predominant role in any axiomatization of a logic in Hilbert-style. Clark [4] has presented an axiomatization of quantum logic with negation ¬ and material implication → as primitive connectives. In this paper we do not follow this approach. First of all, this approach is greatly complicated because orthomodular lattices are only locally distributive.
According to quantum mechanics, the pure states of a microsystem are represented by vectors in a Hilbert Space. Sentences of the form, "x є L" (where x is the state vector for a system, L a subspace of the appropriate Hilbert space), may be called Q-propositions: such sentences serve to summarise our information about the results of possible experiments on the system. Quantum logic investigates the relations which hold among the Q-propositions about a given physical sys tem. These logical relations correspond to algebraic relations among the subspaces of Hilbert space. The algebra of this set of subspaces is non-Boolean, and may be regarded either as an orthomodular lattice or as a partial Boolean algebra. With each type of structure we can associate a logic. A general approach to the semantics for such a logic is provided in terms of interpretations of a formal language within an algebraic structure; an interpretation maps sentences of the language homomorphically onto elements of the structure. When the structure in question is a Boolean algera, the resulting logic is classical; here we develop a semantics for the logic associated with partial Boolean algebras. Two systems of proof, based on the natural deduction systems of Gentzen, are shown for this logic. With respect to the given sematics, these calculi are sound and weakly complete. Strong completeness is conjectured. Quantum logic deals with the logical relations between sentences, and so is properly called a logic. However, it is the logic appropriate to a limited class of sentences: proposals that it should replace classical logic wherever the latter is used should be viewed with suspicion.
Introduction. Operational quantum logic: An overview B. Coecke, et al. I: Algebras. Algebraic aspects of orthomodular lattices G. Bruns, J. Harding. Observables in the logico-algebraic approach P. Ptak. Test spaces and orthoalgebras A. Wilce. Representations on unigroups D.J. Foulis. Free extensions of group actions, induced representations, and the foundations of physics D.J. Foulis, A. Wilce. II: Categories. Short introduction to enriched categories F. Borceux, I. Stubbe. Operational Galois adjunctions B. Coecke, D. Moore. Operational axiomatics and compound systems F. Valckenborgh. Quantales J. Paseka, J. Rosicky. III: Languages. Quantales and observational semantics P. Resende. Quantum languages S. Gudder. Indices. Concept index. Citation index.
This chapter contains a brief introduction to mathematical formalism and QM axiomatics. It is oriented to non-physicists. Since QM is a statistical theory it is natural to start with the classical probability model (Kolmogorov [ 191 ], 1933). Then we present the basics of the theory of Hilbert spaces and Hermitian operators and the representation of pure and mixed states by normalized vectors and density operators. This introduction is sufficient to formulate the axiomatics of QM in the form of five postulates. The projection postulate (the most questionable postulate of QM) is presented in a separate section. We sharply distinguish between the cases of quantum observables represented by Hermitian operators with nondegenerate and degenerate spectra, von Neumann’s and Ltiders’s forms of the projection postulate. The axiomatics is completed by a short section on the main interpretations of QM. The projection postulate (LUders’s form) plays a crucial role in the definition of quantum conditional (transition) probability. By operating with the latter we consider interference of probabilities for two incompatible observables as a modification of the formula of total probability by adding the interference term. This viewpoint to interference of probabilities was elaborated in a series of works by Khrennikov. Since classical probability theory is based on the 142 Boolean algebra of events, a violation of the law of total probability can be treated as the probabilistic sign of a violation of the laws of the Boolean logics. From this viewpoint, quantum theory can be considered as representing a new kind of logic, so-called quantum logic. The latter is also briefly presented in a separate section. We continue this review with a new portion of quantum mathematics, namely the notion of the tensor product of Hilbert spaces and the tensor product of operators. After the section on Dirac’s notation with ket and bra vector, we discuss briefly the notion of qubit and entanglement of a few qubits. This chapter concludes with a presentation of the detailed analysis of the probabilistic structure of the two-slit experiment in a bunch of different experimental contexts. This contextual structure leads to a violation of the law of total probability and non-Kolmogorovean probabilistic structure of this experiment.
Abstract Quantum information science is a new and rapidly developing discipline that studies the general laws governing the transmission, storage, and processing of information in systems that obey the laws of quantum mechanics. It makes extensive use of matrix theory and operator theory on Hilbert spaces to investigate the capabilities of such systems and to develop principles for their rational design. An important consequence of the development of quantum information science is a substantial clarification of the logical structure and foundations of quantum mechanics and of its relation to reality. These lectures are devoted to the foundations of the mathematical theory of quantum systems: states, observables, communication channels, their entropic and information characteristics, and quantum information-processing protocols. The lectures provide a detailed introduction to the statistical structure of quantum theory and the necessary background from classical information theory; hence, knowledge of the basic mathematical subjects—analysis, linear algebra, and probability theory—is sufficient for understanding the material. In the first part of the course, we use the “standard” statistical model of a quantum system, but consider it in comparison with the classical statistical description. A consistent development of this approach leads to a generalized statistical model of quantum mechanics, in which observables (in general, “unsharp”) are described by probability operator-valued measures, while evolutions (in general, irreversible) are described by completely positive maps. Introductory material on these concepts, which underlie mathematical models of quantum information systems in the presence of noise and errors and have numerous applications in quantum information science, is presented in the second part of the course.