Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Schrödinger operators

E. B. Davies

Published Jan 26, 1995• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1017/cbo9780511623721.009

Related papers

Schrödinger Operators

Helge Holden, Arne Jensen

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 1989•9 citations

The Schrödinger operator as a generalized Laplacian

Katarzyna Grabowska, Janusz Grabowski, Paweł Urbański

The Schrödinger operators on the Newtonian spacetime are defined in a way which make them independent of the class of inertial observers. In this picture the Schrödinger operators act not on functions on the spacetime but on sections of a certain one-dimensional complex vector bundle—the Schrödinger line bundle . This line bundle has trivializations indexed by inertial observers and is associated with an U (1)-principal bundle with an analogous list of trivializations—the Schrödinger principal bundle . If an inertial frame is fixed, the Schrödinger bundle can be identified with the trivial bundle over spacetime, but as there is no canonical trivialization (inertial frame), these sections interpreted as 'wavefunctions' cannot be viewed as actual functions on the spacetime. In this approach, the change of an observer results not only in the change of actual coordinates in the spacetime but also in a change of the phase of wavefunctions. For the Schrödinger principal bundle, a natural differential calculus for 'wave forms' is developed that leads to a natural generalization of the concept of the Laplace–Beltrami operator associated with a pseudo-Riemannian metric. The free Schrödinger operator turns out to be the Laplace–Beltrami operator associated with a naturally distinguished invariant pseudo-Riemannian metric on the Schrödinger principal bundle. The presented framework does not involve any ad hoc or axiomatically introduced geometrical structures. It is based on the traditional understanding of the Schrödinger operator in a given reference frame—which is supported by producing right physics predictions—and it is proven to be strictly related to the frame-independent formulation of analytical Newtonian mechanics and Hamilton–Jacobi equations that makes a bridge between the classical and quantum theory.

arXiv:0711.2777•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Mar 26, 2008•3 citations

Schrödinger operators

Konrad Jörgens, Joachim Weidmann

Lecture notes in mathematics•Jan 1, 1973•0 citations

The norm estimate of the difference between the Kac operator and the Schrödinger semigroup: A unified approach to the nonrelativistic and relativistic cases

Takashi Ichinose, Satoshi Takanobu

Abstract. An Lp operator norm estimate of the difference between the Kac operator and the Schrödinger semigroup is proved and used to give a variant of the Trotter product formula for Schrödinger operators in the Lp operator norm. The method of the proof is probabilistic based on the Feynman-Kac formula. The problem is discussed in the relativistic as well as nonrelativistic case.

Nagoya Mathematical Journal•Mar 1, 1998•12 citations

Schrödinger Operators

S. Graffi

Lecture notes in mathematics•Jan 1, 1985•3 citations

The Schrodinger and the Heisenberg Operators

Anamitra Palit

This brief article in the first section brings out the fact that the Heisenberg and the Schrodinger operators become identical if the operators correspond to a conserved quantity. In Section II solutions we show that for time independent operators 𝐴𝑆 that satisfy [𝐴𝑆,𝐻]=0 where 𝐻 satisfies the Schrodinger equation 𝑖ℏ𝜕𝜓𝜕𝑡=𝐻𝜓 we have 𝐴𝑆=𝑎 where ‘a’ is an eigen value of the stated equation. It is independent of space and time coordinates.

•Dec 1, 2019•0 citations
The Schrödinger operators on the Newtonian spacetime are defined in a way which make them independent of the class of inertial observers. In this picture the Schrödinger operators act not on functions on the spacetime but on sections of a certain one-dimensional complex vector bundle—the Schrödinger line bundle . This line bundle has trivializations indexed by inertial observers and is associated with an U (1)-principal bundle with an analogous list of trivializations—the Schrödinger principal bundle . If an inertial frame is fixed, the Schrödinger bundle can be identified with the trivial bundle over spacetime, but as there is no canonical trivialization (inertial frame), these sections interpreted as 'wavefunctions' cannot be viewed as actual functions on the spacetime. In this approach, the change of an observer results not only in the change of actual coordinates in the spacetime but also in a change of the phase of wavefunctions. For the Schrödinger principal bundle, a natural differential calculus for 'wave forms' is developed that leads to a natural generalization of the concept of the Laplace–Beltrami operator associated with a pseudo-Riemannian metric. The free Schrödinger operator turns out to be the Laplace–Beltrami operator associated with a naturally distinguished invariant pseudo-Riemannian metric on the Schrödinger principal bundle. The presented framework does not involve any ad hoc or axiomatically introduced geometrical structures. It is based on the traditional understanding of the Schrödinger operator in a given reference frame—which is supported by producing right physics predictions—and it is proven to be strictly related to the frame-independent formulation of analytical Newtonian mechanics and Hamilton–Jacobi equations that makes a bridge between the classical and quantum theory.