Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The energy-time uncertainty principle and the EPR paradox: Experiments involving correlated two-photon emission in parametric down-conversion

R. Y. Chiao, Paul G. Kwiat, Aephraim M. Steinberg

Published Feb 1, 1992• 3 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

The energy-time uncertainty principle is on a different footing than the momentum position uncertainty principle: in contrast to position, time is a c-number parameter, and not an operator. As Aharonov and Bohm have pointed out, this leads to different interpretations of the two uncertainty principles. In particular, one must distinguish between an inner and an outer time in the definition of the spread in time, delta t. It is the inner time which enters the energy-time uncertainty principle. We have checked this by means of a correlated two-photon light source in which the individual energies of the two photons are broad in spectra, but in which their sum is sharp. In other words, the pair of photons is in an entangled state of energy. By passing one member of the photon pair through a filter with width delta E, it is observed that the other member's wave packet collapses upon coincidence detection to a duration delta t, such that delta E(delta t) is approximately equal to planks constant/2 pi, where this duration delta t is an inner time, in the sense of Aharonov and Bohm. We have measured delta t by means of a Michelson interferometer by monitoring the visibility of the fringes seen in coincidence detection. This is a nonlocal effect, in the sense that the two photons are far away from each other when the collapse occurs. We have excluded classical-wave explanations of this effect by means of triple coincidence measurements in conjunction with a beam splitter which follows the Michelson interferometer. Since Bell's inequalities are known to be violated, we believe that it is also incorrect to interpret this experimental outcome as if energy were a local hidden variable, i.e., as if each photon, viewed as a particle, possessed some definite but unknown energy before its detection.

Related papers

An energy–time Bell inequality in two-photon interferometry

Paul G. Kwiat, Aephraim M. Steinberg, R. Y. Chiao

We have performed an EPR-type experiment first proposed by Franson,1 resulting in two-particle interference that is both nonclassical and nonlocal. We used photon pairs produced in an entangled state of energy via spontaneous down-conversion. Each photon enters an unbalanced interferometer, and we detect singles and coincidence rates at the output ports. If the long- and short-arm path-length difference is much greater than the photons’ coherence lengths, no fringes are seen in singles as the arm lengths are varied. Yet when the difference between the path-length differences of the two interferometers is less than these coherence lengths, fringes are observed in coincidence, resulting from an interference of the (indistinguishable) “long–long” and “short–short" coincidence possibilities. If the electronic resolution is sufficient to eliminate the background of "short–long" and "long–short” coincidences, the visibility may be as high as 100%.2 For V > 71%, with certain reasonable auxiliary assumptions, Bell’s inequalities can be violated. The interpretation is that no local, realistic model can yield the observed results. The use of this type of entangled state is significant because it is much closer to the original EPR paradox than the spin-singlet case commonly considered.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1992•0 citations

Closer Look at EPR Paradox and Bell’s Inequality

Vladimir K. Ignatovich

The EPR paradox is shown to be a result of the wrong definitions in quantum mechanics of such physical quantities as momentum and position. The corrected definitions show that momentum and position of particles can be precisely defined simultaneously and uncertainty relations do not prevent it. Therefore, with correct definition of physical quantities in quantum mechanics, the paradox disappears. The Bohm Aharonov version of the EPR paradox is illustrated by the example of measuring the polarization of photon pairs. The common view of the two photon state radiated by a source is presented. The common Bell’s inequality is discussed and the simplest version of it for a specific hidden variable is derived. A possibility of an experimental study of whether a photon and its polarization are preexistent before measurements is considered.

American Journal of Modern Physics•Apr 17, 2015•1 citation

Beyond the heisenberg uncertainty

Yanhua H. Shih

An entangled EPR two-particle system is characterized by Δ(p 1 + p 2) = 0 and Δ(x 1 - x 2) = 0, simultaneously, with the momentum and position of each individual particle completely undefined. Statistically, however, the uncertainty of the correlation measurements on the two individual particles must obey Δ(p1 + p 2) > Δp 1,2 and Δ(x 1 - x 2) > Δx 1,2. While one sees the measurements of p 1 + p 2 and x 1 - x 2 of the two individual particles satisfying the EPR δ-function, and believes the classical statistical inequality, one might easily be trapped into concluding either there is a violation of the uncertainty principle or there exists action-at-a-distance. Through the analysis of three typical EPR experiments, we show that the measurement of p 1 + p 2 and x 1 - x 2 for an entangled system can indeed violate the classical statistical inequality. Based on the experimental results, we emphasize, again, the surprising physics of quantum coherent two-particle superposition. Although questions regarding fundamental issues of quantum theory still exist, quantum entanglement has brought us a novel concept in non-local timing and positioning measurements with ultra-high accuracy, even beyond the classical limit.

Journal of Modern Optics•Nov 1, 2004•0 citations

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox for energy-time variables

Давид Николаевич Клышко

A new variant of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment is discussed which illustrates the complementarity principle and the indeterminancy relations for the energy and the time of creation of photons emitted as correlated pairs in the decay of a metastable state of an atom or in parametric scattering of light. It is shown that it is not possible a priori to ascribe to such photons a definite temporal structure; it acquires an operational meaning only after one of the photons of the pair is recorded by a detector with a definite frequency characteristic. A simple interpretation of the effect is possible by means of an advanced wave emitted by one of the detectors at the instant of the photon being recorded.

Soviet Physics Uspekhi•Jun 30, 1989•30 citations

The EPR paradox and the uncertainty principle

M. E. McCulloch, Jaume Giné

The EPR paradox appears when measurement results of some properties of two distantly entangled particles are correlated in a way that cannot be explained classically, and apparently violate locality. The resolution of the paradox depends on one’s interpretation of quantum mechanics. Explanations from quantum mechanics remain commonplace today, but they fail to explain the EPR (Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen) paradox totally in a way than can be accepted by the whole community. Here, we present a simple resolution to this paradox in which the uncertainty in the energy of the two-particle system is reduced by its lack of interaction during the journey so that the uncertainty in time becomes greater than the time they have been separating. Consequently, the present and past become indistinguishable because when we measure an observable in the system its value is the same as if the two particle were still together or very close. It is also argued that the destruction of information as the present and past become identical should release heat by Landauer’s principle, and this might make this proposal testable.

Modern Physics Letters B•Jan 18, 2021•2 citations

Experimental Test of Bell's Inequality for Energy and Time

Jurgen Brendel, Ernst Mohler, W. Martienssen

An interference experiment with photon pairs produced by degenerate parametric fluorescence is performed. The pairs are split and directed to two spatially separated Michelson interferometers. The interferometers are set to path differences which cause time delays far exceeding the coherence time of the light. We investigate photon coincidences between the output arms of the interferometers and observe nonlocal fourth-order interferences in the absence of second-order interferences. Maximum visibilities up to 86% are obtained, leading to a violation of Bell's inequality for energy and time by several standard deviations.

Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Dec 1, 1992•238 citations
The energy-time uncertainty principle is on a different footing than the momentum position uncertainty principle: in contrast to position, time is a c-number parameter, and not an operator. As Aharonov and Bohm have pointed out, this leads to different interpretations of the two uncertainty principles. In particular, one must distinguish between an inner and an outer time in the definition of the spread in time, delta t. It is the inner time which enters the energy-time uncertainty principle. We have checked this by means of a correlated two-photon light source in which the individual energies of the two photons are broad in spectra, but in which their sum is sharp. In other words, the pair of photons is in an entangled state of energy. By passing one member of the photon pair through a filter with width delta E, it is observed that the other member's wave packet collapses upon coincidence detection to a duration delta t, such that delta E(delta t) is approximately equal to planks constant/2 pi, where this duration delta t is an inner time, in the sense of Aharonov and Bohm. We have measured delta t by means of a Michelson interferometer by monitoring the visibility of the fringes seen in coincidence detection. This is a nonlocal effect, in the sense that the two photons are far away from each other when the collapse occurs. We have excluded classical-wave explanations of this effect by means of triple coincidence measurements in conjunction with a beam splitter which follows the Michelson interferometer. Since Bell's inequalities are known to be violated, we believe that it is also incorrect to interpret this experimental outcome as if energy were a local hidden variable, i.e., as if each photon, viewed as a particle, possessed some definite but unknown energy before its detection.
We have performed an EPR-type experiment first proposed by Franson,1 resulting in two-particle interference that is both nonclassical and nonlocal. We used photon pairs produced in an entangled state of energy via spontaneous down-conversion. Each photon enters an unbalanced interferometer, and we detect singles and coincidence rates at the output ports. If the long- and short-arm path-length difference is much greater than the photons’ coherence lengths, no fringes are seen in singles as the arm lengths are varied. Yet when the difference between the path-length differences of the two interferometers is less than these coherence lengths, fringes are observed in coincidence, resulting from an interference of the (indistinguishable) “long–long” and “short–short" coincidence possibilities. If the electronic resolution is sufficient to eliminate the background of "short–long" and "long–short” coincidences, the visibility may be as high as 100%.2 For V > 71%, with certain reasonable auxiliary assumptions, Bell’s inequalities can be violated. The interpretation is that no local, realistic model can yield the observed results. The use of this type of entangled state is significant because it is much closer to the original EPR paradox than the spin-singlet case commonly considered.
The EPR paradox is shown to be a result of the wrong definitions in quantum mechanics of such physical quantities as momentum and position. The corrected definitions show that momentum and position of particles can be precisely defined simultaneously and uncertainty relations do not prevent it. Therefore, with correct definition of physical quantities in quantum mechanics, the paradox disappears. The Bohm Aharonov version of the EPR paradox is illustrated by the example of measuring the polarization of photon pairs. The common view of the two photon state radiated by a source is presented. The common Bell’s inequality is discussed and the simplest version of it for a specific hidden variable is derived. A possibility of an experimental study of whether a photon and its polarization are preexistent before measurements is considered.
An entangled EPR two-particle system is characterized by Δ(p 1 + p 2) = 0 and Δ(x 1 - x 2) = 0, simultaneously, with the momentum and position of each individual particle completely undefined. Statistically, however, the uncertainty of the correlation measurements on the two individual particles must obey Δ(p1 + p 2) > Δp 1,2 and Δ(x 1 - x 2) > Δx 1,2. While one sees the measurements of p 1 + p 2 and x 1 - x 2 of the two individual particles satisfying the EPR δ-function, and believes the classical statistical inequality, one might easily be trapped into concluding either there is a violation of the uncertainty principle or there exists action-at-a-distance. Through the analysis of three typical EPR experiments, we show that the measurement of p 1 + p 2 and x 1 - x 2 for an entangled system can indeed violate the classical statistical inequality. Based on the experimental results, we emphasize, again, the surprising physics of quantum coherent two-particle superposition. Although questions regarding fundamental issues of quantum theory still exist, quantum entanglement has brought us a novel concept in non-local timing and positioning measurements with ultra-high accuracy, even beyond the classical limit.
A new variant of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment is discussed which illustrates the complementarity principle and the indeterminancy relations for the energy and the time of creation of photons emitted as correlated pairs in the decay of a metastable state of an atom or in parametric scattering of light. It is shown that it is not possible a priori to ascribe to such photons a definite temporal structure; it acquires an operational meaning only after one of the photons of the pair is recorded by a detector with a definite frequency characteristic. A simple interpretation of the effect is possible by means of an advanced wave emitted by one of the detectors at the instant of the photon being recorded.
The EPR paradox appears when measurement results of some properties of two distantly entangled particles are correlated in a way that cannot be explained classically, and apparently violate locality. The resolution of the paradox depends on one’s interpretation of quantum mechanics. Explanations from quantum mechanics remain commonplace today, but they fail to explain the EPR (Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen) paradox totally in a way than can be accepted by the whole community. Here, we present a simple resolution to this paradox in which the uncertainty in the energy of the two-particle system is reduced by its lack of interaction during the journey so that the uncertainty in time becomes greater than the time they have been separating. Consequently, the present and past become indistinguishable because when we measure an observable in the system its value is the same as if the two particle were still together or very close. It is also argued that the destruction of information as the present and past become identical should release heat by Landauer’s principle, and this might make this proposal testable.
An interference experiment with photon pairs produced by degenerate parametric fluorescence is performed. The pairs are split and directed to two spatially separated Michelson interferometers. The interferometers are set to path differences which cause time delays far exceeding the coherence time of the light. We investigate photon coincidences between the output arms of the interferometers and observe nonlocal fourth-order interferences in the absence of second-order interferences. Maximum visibilities up to 86% are obtained, leading to a violation of Bell's inequality for energy and time by several standard deviations.