AIP conference proceedings
Reflexion Laws In Atoms Optics
S. Ghezali, A. Taleb, El-Hachemi Amara, Saïd Boudjemai, Djamila Doumaz
Abstract
This poster presents a first analysis of the laws of reflection of cold atoms by an evanescent wave atomic mirror. We demonstrate that when the laser beam is tuned to the blue of the atomic transition, i.e, for a positive frequency detuning compared to the frequency resonance Δ = ωL−ωa, there is a reflection without a contact with the surface of the prism (no adsorption). The condition for an internal total reflection is θ>θc = arcsin (1/n) where θ is the incidence angle of the laser wave on the internal face of the prism and n is its refraction index. The evanescent wave is parallel to the surface and propagates over few wavelengths only for θ = θc. The atomic trajectory is such as the incidence angle φi is different from the reflection angle φr (non respect of the first law of reflection in photonic optics). We’ll have to demonstrate the reflection law in atom optics and give numerical examples as an illustration [1]. At its interaction with the evanescent wave, the atom is submitted to a pressure radiation force Fx parallel to the surface of separation which communicates a quantity of motion in the direction of the x axis. It is also submitted to a dipolar force Fy perpendicular to the separation surface responsible of the repulsion of cold atoms in the case where we neglect the Van der Waals forces. We define R as the ratio of two forces Fx and Fy. Their expressions, function of the detuning, are given by the Ehrenfest theorem and the Bloch equations [2]. When the ratio R tends towards zero (spontaneous emission negligible for a detuning important compared to natural linewidth of the excited state), the first law of Descartes reflection is thus satisfied idem φi = φr Thus, it is simple to demonstrate that the atomic trajectories obey to the general reflection law: tg φr = tg φi−2R where R is independent of the spatial component. Its expression is given by the ratio of the velocity transfers Δvx to Δvy. The case of retro‐reflection seen in quasi normal incidence and for values of the ratio R different from zero (φi = −φr) is also examined. In the case where the value of the ratio R is non null, we may demonstrate that the incidence plan is different from the reflection plan (second law of Descartes reflection).