Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Correlations Conundrum: An Automaton-Theoretic Approach

Cristian S. Calude, Elena Calude, Karl Svozil

Published Jun 1, 1999• 3 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

We develop an automatic-theoretic analysis of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen conundrum on the basis of two simple devices introduced by Mermin [10, 11].

Related papers

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Correlations, Entanglement and Quantum Cryptography

M. D. Reid

Springer series on atomic, optical, and plasma physics•Jan 1, 2004•2 citations

Quantum correlations violate Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen assumptions

Thomas F. Jordan

The inconsistency between quantum mechanics and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen assumptions about locality and reality cannot be avoided by restricting attention to correlations. This is demonstrated by reworking the logical scheme that was developed to show inconsistency without inequalities for two particles, adapting it to correlations in two pairs of particles, so the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen arguments can be made entirely in terms of correlations. A simple example is given.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1999•14 citations

Data analysis of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm laboratory experiments

Hans A. De Raedt, Fengping Jin, Kristel F. L. Michielsen

Data sets produced by three different Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm (EPRB) experiments are tested against the hypothesis that the statistics of this data is described by quantum theory. Although these experiments generate data that violate Bell inequalities for suitable choices of the time-coincidence window, the analysis shows that it is highly unlikely that these data sets are compatible with the quantum theoretical description of the EPRB experiment, suggesting that the popular statements that EPRB experiments agree with quantum theory lack a solid scientific basis and that more precise experiments are called for.

•Jan 1, 2013•23 citations

Quantum Action-at-a-Distance: The Mystery of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Correlations

Anastasios Kyprianidis, Jean Pierre Vigier

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•1 citation

Data analysis of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm laboratory experiments

Hans A. De Raedt, F. Jin, K. Michielsen

Data sets produced by three different Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm (EPRB) experiments are tested against the hypothesis that the statistics of this data is described by quantum theory. Although these experiments generate data that violate Bell inequalities for suitable choices of the time-coincidence window, the analysis shows that it is highly unlikely that these data sets are compatible with the quantum theoretical description of the EPRB experiment, suggesting that the popular statements that EPRB experiments agree with quantum theory lack a solid scientific basis and that more precise experiments are called for.

arXiv:1312.6361•Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Oct 1, 2013•21 citations

Quantum Correlations from a Logical Point of View

Nikos A. Tambakis

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1994•0 citations
Data sets produced by three different Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm (EPRB) experiments are tested against the hypothesis that the statistics of this data is described by quantum theory. Although these experiments generate data that violate Bell inequalities for suitable choices of the time-coincidence window, the analysis shows that it is highly unlikely that these data sets are compatible with the quantum theoretical description of the EPRB experiment, suggesting that the popular statements that EPRB experiments agree with quantum theory lack a solid scientific basis and that more precise experiments are called for.
Data sets produced by three different Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm (EPRB) experiments are tested against the hypothesis that the statistics of this data is described by quantum theory. Although these experiments generate data that violate Bell inequalities for suitable choices of the time-coincidence window, the analysis shows that it is highly unlikely that these data sets are compatible with the quantum theoretical description of the EPRB experiment, suggesting that the popular statements that EPRB experiments agree with quantum theory lack a solid scientific basis and that more precise experiments are called for.