Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)

On the minimum distance of concatenated codes and decoding based on the true minimum distance

Toshiyuki Kohnosu, T. Nishijima, Shigeichi Hirasawa

Published Nov 22, 2002• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We show some conditions that the minimum distance of concatenated codes is beyond the lower bound. Furthermore a new decoding method is proposed up to the true minimum distance.
DOI
10.1109/isit.1997.613364

Related papers

On the Minimum Distance of Concatenated Codes and Decoding Method up to the True Minimum Distance

Toshiyuki Kohnosu, Toshihisa Nishijima, Shigeichi Hirasawa

IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences•Nov 25, 1997•0 citations

List decoding of concatenated codes: improved performance estimates

Alexander Barg, Andrew McGregor

An improved bound is proved on the list-decoding radius of a concatenated code relying upon a combination of (soft-decision) algebraic list decoding and generalized minimum distance (GMD) decoding in the outer level. This bound is further improved if the inner code is a random linear code.

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Dec 23, 2004•0 citations

Reduced GMD decoding of concatenated codes

Jos H. Weber, Khaled Abdel-Ghaffar

We present a general version of the generalized minimum distance (GMD) decoding algorithm (see Forney, G.D., Jr, 1966) that accommodates different erasing strategies. This version is called reduced GMD decoding since, depending on the erasing strategy used, it can offer a reduction in complexity over Forney's GMD decoding. We apply reduced GMD decoding to concatenated codes. In particular, we study the error correction capability and the unsuccessful decoding probability of concatenated codes with reduced GMD decoding.

Globecom•Nov 13, 2002•0 citations

Some algebraic and distance properties of convolutional codes.

James L. Massey

Upper and lower bounds for feedback decoding and definite decoding minimum distances of binary convolutional codes

•Jan 1, 1968•3 citations

Concatenation of Quantum Error-Correcting Codes and Lower Bounds on the Largest Minimum Distance

Hamada Mitsuru

IEICE Technical Report; IEICE Tech. Rep.•Jul 18, 2008•0 citations

Concatenated Codes

Ron M. Roth

In this chapter, we continue the discussion on concatenated codes, which was initiated in Section 5.4. The main message to be conveyed in this chapter is that by using concatenation, one can obtain codes with favorable asymptotic performance—in a sense to be quantified more precisely—while the complexity of constructing these codes and decoding them grows polynomially with the code length. We first present a decoding algorithm for concatenated codes, due to Forney. This algorithm, referred to as a generalized minimum distance (in short, GMD) decoder, corrects any error pattern whose Hamming weight is less than half the product of the minimum distances of the inner and outer codes (we recall that this product is a lower bound on the minimum distance of the respective concatenated code). A GMD decoder consists of a nearest-codeword decoder for the inner code, and a combined error–erasure decoder for the outer code. It then enumerates over a threshold value, marking the output of the inner decoder as erasure if that decoder returns an inner codeword whose Hamming distance from the respective received sub-word equals or exceeds that threshold. We show that under our assumption on the overall Hamming weight of the error word, there is at least one threshold for which the outer decoder recovers the correct codeword. If the outer code is taken as a GRS code, then a GMD decoder has an implementation with time complexity that is at most quadratic in the length of the concatenated code.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 23, 2006•0 citations
We present a general version of the generalized minimum distance (GMD) decoding algorithm (see Forney, G.D., Jr, 1966) that accommodates different erasing strategies. This version is called reduced GMD decoding since, depending on the erasing strategy used, it can offer a reduction in complexity over Forney's GMD decoding. We apply reduced GMD decoding to concatenated codes. In particular, we study the error correction capability and the unsuccessful decoding probability of concatenated codes with reduced GMD decoding.
In this chapter, we continue the discussion on concatenated codes, which was initiated in Section 5.4. The main message to be conveyed in this chapter is that by using concatenation, one can obtain codes with favorable asymptotic performance—in a sense to be quantified more precisely—while the complexity of constructing these codes and decoding them grows polynomially with the code length. We first present a decoding algorithm for concatenated codes, due to Forney. This algorithm, referred to as a generalized minimum distance (in short, GMD) decoder, corrects any error pattern whose Hamming weight is less than half the product of the minimum distances of the inner and outer codes (we recall that this product is a lower bound on the minimum distance of the respective concatenated code). A GMD decoder consists of a nearest-codeword decoder for the inner code, and a combined error–erasure decoder for the outer code. It then enumerates over a threshold value, marking the output of the inner decoder as erasure if that decoder returns an inner codeword whose Hamming distance from the respective received sub-word equals or exceeds that threshold. We show that under our assumption on the overall Hamming weight of the error word, there is at least one threshold for which the outer decoder recovers the correct codeword. If the outer code is taken as a GRS code, then a GMD decoder has an implementation with time complexity that is at most quadratic in the length of the concatenated code.