Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Quanta in context

Joseph Agassi

Published Apr 6, 2008• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/3-540-09718-x_74

Related papers

On Information, Quanta, and Context

J. Acácio de Barros

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Feb 1, 2020•0 citations

Quanta and Mind

Synthese Library/Synthese library•Jan 1, 2019•12 citations

2. Quanta

Philip Ball

Cairn.info•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

Some Comments inspired by Dainis Zeps' Quanta Mathematica Instrumentalis

Matti Pitkänen

The ideas introduced by Dainis Zeps in the article Quanta Mathematica Instrumentalis and related articles are discussed in the conceptual framework of Topological Geometrodynamics. The concrete realization for the vision about physics as mathematics is discussed in TGD context and the idea about instrumentalism as key element of mathematics and science is analyzed and criticized. Also the notions of theorem and quantum windows, higher observer, and information field are discussed.

Prespacetime journal•Apr 28, 2011•0 citations

The Principle of equal Probabilities of Quantum States

M. Psimopoulos, Emilie Dafflon

The statistical problem of the distribution of $s$ quanta of equal energy $ε_0$ and total energy $E$ among $N$ distinguishable particles is resolved using the conventional theory based on Boltzmann's principle of equal probabilities of configurations of particles distributed among energy levels and the concept of average state. In particular, the probability that a particle is in the \k{appa}-th energy level i.e. contains \k{appa} quanta, is given by $p(κ)=\displaystyle \frac{\displaystyle \binom{N+s-κ-2}{N-2}}{\displaystyle \binom{N+s-1}{N-1}} \;\;\; ; \;\;\; κ= 0, 1, 2, \cdots, s$ In this context, the special case ($N=4$, $s=4$) presented indicates that the alternative concept of most probable state is not valid for finite values of $s$ and $N$. In the present article we derive alternatively $p(κ)$ by distributing $s$ quanta over $N$ particles and by introducing a new principle of equal probability of quantum states, where the quanta are indistinguishable in agreement with the Bose statistics. Therefore, the analysis of the two approaches presented in this paper highlights the equivalence of quantum theory with classical statistical mechanics for the present system. At the limit $ε_{o} \rightarrow 0 $; $s \rightarrow \infty $; $s ε_{o} = E \sim$ fixed, where the energy of the particles becomes continuous, $p(κ)$ transforms to the Boltzmann law $P(ε) = \displaystyle \frac{1}{\langle ε\rangle}e^{-\fracε{\langle ε\rangle}} \;\;\; ; \;\;\; 0\leq ε< +\infty$ where $\langle ε\rangle = E/N$. Hence, the classical principle of equal a priori probabilities for the energy of the particles leading to the above law, is justified here by quantum mechanics.

arXiv:2111.09246•Nov 17, 2021•0 citations

Time and quanta

George Jaroszkiewicz

Oxford University Press eBooks•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations
The statistical problem of the distribution of sss quanta of equal energy ε0ε_0ε0​ and total energy EEE among NNN distinguishable particles is resolved using the conventional theory based on Boltzmann's principle of equal probabilities of configurations of particles distributed among energy levels and the concept of average state. In particular, the probability that a particle is in the \k{appa}-th energy level i.e. contains \k{appa} quanta, is given by p(κ)=(N+s−κ−2N−2)(N+s−1N−1)      ;      κ=0,1,2,⋯ ,sp(κ)=\displaystyle \frac{\displaystyle \binom{N+s-κ-2}{N-2}}{\displaystyle \binom{N+s-1}{N-1}} \;\;\; ; \;\;\; κ= 0, 1, 2, \cdots, sp(κ)=(N−1N+s−1​)(N−2N+s−κ−2​)​;κ=0,1,2,⋯,s In this context, the special case (N=4N=4N=4, s=4s=4s=4) presented indicates that the alternative concept of most probable state is not valid for finite values of sss and NNN. In the present article we derive alternatively p(κ)p(κ)p(κ) by distributing sss quanta over NNN particles and by introducing a new principle of equal probability of quantum states, where the quanta are indistinguishable in agreement with the Bose statistics. Therefore, the analysis of the two approaches presented in this paper highlights the equivalence of quantum theory with classical statistical mechanics for the present system. At the limit $ε_{o} \rightarrow 0 $; $s \rightarrow \infty $; sεo=E∼s ε_{o} = E \simsεo​=E∼ fixed, where the energy of the particles becomes continuous, p(κ)p(κ)p(κ) transforms to the Boltzmann law P(ε)=1⟨ε⟩e−ε⟨ε⟩      ;      0≤ε<+∞P(ε) = \displaystyle \frac{1}{\langle ε\rangle}e^{-\fracε{\langle ε\rangle}} \;\;\; ; \;\;\; 0\leq ε< +\inftyP(ε)=⟨ε⟩1​e−⟨ε⟩ε​;0≤ε<+∞ where ⟨ε⟩=E/N\langle ε\rangle = E/N⟨ε⟩=E/N. Hence, the classical principle of equal a priori probabilities for the energy of the particles leading to the above law, is justified here by quantum mechanics.