An attempt is made to construct quantum mechanics in one dimension on the basis of finite displacements. Replacing the differential operator by a difference operator indicates a possibility of using a right or left difference and further, that the state vector is a 2-spinor. An indefinite metric is introduced in this spinor space with respect to which the displacement operators in two opposite directions are hermitian conjugates. After further operations, the formalism obtained can be generalized to the case of a complex plane. Its generalization to the whole space can be effected along Weizacker's ideas of a fundamental alternative. (auth)
An attempt is made to construct quantum mechanics in one dimension on the basis of finite displacements. Replacing the differential operator by a difference operator indicates a possibility of using a right or left difference and further, that the state vector is a 2-spinor. An indefinite metric is introduced in this spinor space with respect to which the displacement operators in two opposite directions are hermitian conjugates. After further operations, the formalism obtained can be generalized to the case of a complex plane. Its generalization to the whole space can be effected along Weizacker's ideas of a fundamental alternative. (auth)
In Chapter 4 we saw that the canonical commutation relations force us to use a space of states of infinite dimension, in which rigor would require the use of advanced mathematical tools. Fortunately, physicists generally need only to carry the results for finite dimension over to infinite dimension with some simple modifications which we shall indicate here, without embarking on sophisticated mathematics. Nevertheless, it is useful to be aware of the lapses in rigor which are customarily made in physics in order to avoid possible unpleasant surprises. The objective of this chapter is, on the one hand, to present some concrete examples illustrating the new features which arise in infinite dimension and, on the other, to give the rules for practical calculations, in particular to write down the spectral decomposition of Hermitian and unitary operators. The mathematics we use is a bit more detailed than commonly found in most quantum mechanics textbooks. The reader interested purely in the practical aspects can proceed directly to Section 7.3, where the results essential for later on are summarized. Hilbert spaces Definitions The space of states of quantum mechanics is a Hilbert space ℌ, which in general is of infinite dimension. The axiomatic definition of a Hilbert space is the following. It is a vector space which, for the needs of quantum mechanics, is defined on complex numbers. The vectors of this space are denoted |ϕ〉. […]
Relativistic Quantum Mechanics suffers from structural problems which are traced back to the lack of a position operator ˆx, satisfying [ˆx, ˆp] = i¯hˆ1 with the ordinary momentum operator ˆp, in the basic symmetry group – the Poincaré group. In this paper we provide a finite-dimensional extension of the Poincaré group containing only one more (in 1+1D) generator ˆπ, satisfying the commutation relation [ ˆ k, ˆπ] = i¯hˆ1 with the ordinary boost generator ˆ k. The unitary irreducible representations are calculated and the carrier space proves to be the set of Shapiro’s wave functions. The generalized equations of motion constitute a simple example of exactly solvable finite-difference set of equations associated with infinite-order polarization equations. Introduction: Higher-order Polarizations One essential difference between Geometric Quantization [1, 2, 3, 4] and a Group Approach to Quantization (GAQ) [5, 6] is the possibility of introducing in the latter higher-order polarizations made out of elements of the (left) enveloping algebra. These higher-order polarizations are especially suitable for those (anomalous) cases in which the
There is a notational discrepancy in how mathematicians and physicists treat Hilbert spaces. In physics, one often works with finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces treated as ℂ n , and hence wants to write the Hermitian inner product as (x, y) = x ∗ y. This definition dictates the use of a Hermitian inner product that is antilinear in the first argument, the convention followed, for example, in Reed & Simon [246]. This is also the choice adopted in Dirac’s bracket notation, whose usage in quantum mechanics is very widespread. Our notation is chosen to extend-as closely as possible-the traditional notation of standard finite-dimensional matrix algebra to arbitrary complex inner product spaces and associated linear operators. In matrix algebra, column vectors and the corresponding matrices with one column are identical objects, row vectors are the linear functionals, and the adjoint is the conjugate transpose. For example, ℍ = ℍ × = ℂ n is the space of column vectors of size n, the dual space ℍ ∗ is the space of row vectors of size n, and the operator product ϕ ∗ ψ of a row vector ϕ ∗ and a column vector ψ is the standard Hermitian inner product of the column vectors ϕ and ψ. We use Greek lower case letters to write vectors, thus emphasizing their intended use as quantum state vectors in quantum mechanics. On the other hand, mathematicians working on reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces use an inner product (x, y) antilinear in the second argument, related to the physicist’s inner product (x, y) by (x, y) =( ). This is the convention followed, for example, in Rudin [252]. Although the two ways of defining the inner product lead to fully equivalent theories, all details look a bit different, a fact that has to be taken into account when reading the literature on the subject. For example, in the description based on the physical tradition, it is preferable to work with the antidual space in place of the dual space used in the mathematical tradition. In functional analysis, linear operators in Hilbert spaces are usually considered each with their own domain. But many computations in quantum mechanics require the consideration of algebras of operators with a common domain. The latter is a Euclidean space, a dense subspace of a Hilbert space. This space and its antidual play in many respects a more basic role in quantum physics than the Hilbert space itself. Therefore, and to avoid possible confusion caused by the different traditions, we give in the present chapter a self-contained introduction to Euclidean spaces and their associated spaces. All proofs are carried out in detail.
We study metric representations in finite-dimensional non-Hermitian quantum mechanics. The main purpose of this work is to emphasize that the physical description of a non-Hermitian system may be formulated in different, but isomorphic, Hilbert spaces. In particular, within the Krein-space formalism, we show that the vector space endowed with an indefinite Krein metric can be explicitly related to the standard Hilbert space through a suitable isomorphism. This observation is essential for a consistent description of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. Physical states, metrics, and operators must be transported through the corresponding Hilbert-space isomorphism. In this way, equivalent representations of the same system can be used without changing the physical content of the theory. We illustrate these theoretical aspects by studying a two-level non-Hermitian spin model. We use the Robertson uncertainty relation as a consistency test. Apparent violations can arise when operators and states are kept fixed while the metric is changed, and therefore reflect a mismatch of representations rather than a failure of the uncertainty principle.