Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nonlinear Optics

Realistic measurement of phase

Henryk Paul

Published Dec 17, 2002• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

One of the most delicate problems in quantum optics is the proper description of the phase of a single-mode radiation field. One has first to devise an experimental scheme for phase measurement, thus giving an operational definition of phase, and afterwards search for the proper quantum-mechanical description of the experimental procedure. Several such schemes which differ distinctly in their experimental setup have already been proposed and even partly realized. In this paper, I will describe them in some detail and present the outlines of their theoretical analysis.>

DOI
10.1109/nlo.1994.470752

Related papers

Realistic measurement of phase

Ulf Leonhardt, Henryk Paul

An overview is given on experimental schemes for measuring phase properties (in particular, phase distributions) discussed and partly even realized thus far. It is pointed out that all of them amount to measuring the Q function for the field. Moreover, experimental procedures for determining the Wigner function for the field more or less directly are described which thus allow to assign experimental significance to the concept of area of overlap in phase space when applied to the quantum mechanical description of phase.

Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1993•17 citations

Realistic Measurement of Phase

Henryk Paul, Ulf Leonhardt

The experimental schemes for measuring quantum-mechanical phase properties of light suggested and partly also realized thus far, namely (i) amplification, with the help of a quantum amplifier, of the microscopic field before phase measurement, (ii) heterodyning the field with a strong local oscillator, and (iii) performing two separate homodyne measurements on the field after beam splitting, are compared from a theoretical point of view.They share the common feature that undesired noise enters the experimental setup, which makes the measurement fuzzy.It will be pointed out that all three schemes amount to measuring the Q function of the original field, and hence are fully equivalent.Since the Q function can be interpreted as a smoothed Wigner function, one may associate with the introduced noise a smoothing process in which intrinsically quantum-mechanical features displayed by finer details of the Wigner function -especially by the occurrence of negative values -are lost.As a consequence, the measured phase distribution will be broader than the "true" one based on the concept of a quantum-mechanical phase operator.In realistic experiments, the nonunit detection efficiency further deteriorates the measuring results.It will be shown that also this echect can be properly described by an (additional) smoothing process leading to a certain s-parametrized quasiprobability distribution, with a parameter s that is connected with the detection efficiency in a simple way, as the distribution that is actually measurable.

Acta Physica Polonica A•Jul 1, 1994•3 citations

Quantum phase and phase dependent measurements

W. P. Schleich, Stephen Mark Barnett

The correct description of the phase variable in quantum mechanics is a question rooted in its earliest formulations. The atom mechanics [1] of Bohr and Sommerfeld—the precursor of modern quantum mechanics—ascribes a central role to action-angle variables. However, Heisenberg's matrix mechanics and Schrödinger's wave mechanics are formulated [2] in terms of the canonical variables representing cartesian coordinates and momenta. Stimulated by this work London [3] attempted a reformulation of these theories in the previously favored action-angle variables. However, this attempt failed due to the difficulty in ascribing quantum operators to the angle variables of classical theory. Despite these difficulties London found [4] an operator representation of the complex exponential of these angle variables. The quantum phase of light made its first appearance in Dirac's classic paper [5] on the quantization of the radiation field. In contrast to modern methods, he constructed the annihilation and creation operators for each field mode from the corresponding amplitude and phase operators. Phase and its quantum nature acquired new significance with the development of lasers in the early sixties: theoretical investigations highlighted significant problems with Dirac's original proposal for the phase operator. A particularly elegant illustration of the difficulty was given by Louisell [6] in 1963. The advent of phase sensitive quantum noise as demonstrated experimentally in the production and detection of squeezed light [7] has created a new wave of interest in the nature of quantum optical phase leading to the discovery of the hermitian optical phase operator [8]. There has followed an explosion of theoretical activity in this area stimulating fresh experimental investigations. In preparing this special issue we have attempted to present the current state of this active and rapidly moving field. We have arranged the papers into what we hope is a coherent representation of the field. The first papers give a historical perspective and overview of current thinking. The two recent experimental investigations which follow are intimately connected to the phase space description of quantum mechanics based on quasi-probability distributions. The representa tion of phase via phase space and its connection with phase-dependent measurements and the phase operator are addressed in the next section. Some more formal considerations pertinent to phase are presented in the following section. Gravitational wave detection and optical communication have motivated the study of the limits of phase noise. Some recent investigations on such optimal phase states are presented. The issue concludes with two papers discussing the significance of phase in light-matter interactions. In concluding we express our gratitude to the authors of the papers in this volume for their efforts in preparing their high quality presentations.

Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1993•74 citations

Phase in optics

Vlasta Peřinová, A. Lukš, Jan Peřina

Phase in classical and nonlinear optics phase-space description of light field phase in quantum optics phase-dependent measurements.

•Jan 1, 1998•56 citations

Conceptions of quantum optical phase

Stephen Mark Barnett, Bryan J. Dalton

Much confusion has resulted from the failure to recognise the different concepts embodied in the single word "phase" as applied to a quantized electromagnetic field mode. In this paper we describe three conceptions of phase and the connections between them.

Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1993•34 citations

Quantum Mechanical Experiments using Optical Techniques in Space

Giacomo Pantaleoni

The focus of this work is discussing the realization of space based experiments testing quantum mechanics, specifically quantum optics. The main experimental work is the practical realization of the earthbound part of a possible interferometric experiment that can be realized with a delayed-choice operational mode. The full Earth-satellite realization of this experimental scheme could set a new record on the distance to which delayed-choice schemes have been experimentally realized. General relativistic effects on Earth-satellite experiments is also discussed, in the case of two different setups. One of those is essentially the ground-space implementation of the interferometer realized in the laboratory, while the other represents a different possibility that could in principle measure gravitational redshift to single photons to greater extent. Which-path behavior and interference were observed to a very good degree on the interferometer realized in the lab. Specifically, the assessment of interference visibility, which was done after careful alignement of the setup, yields a value of approximately 95%, and a comparable value of approx 93% was obtained with an alternative setup which was also experimentally realized in the laboratory. As far as theoretical computations are concerned, a good formalism to deal with space-based interferometric measurements was pointed out, which allows to take into account both special relativistic contributes and general relativistic corrections to the amplitude describing the photons involved with this kind of experiments. Two different setups, which are candidates for the measurement of single photon gravitational redshift, were analyzed with this formalism. The setup with one interferometer on the ground and the other on the satellite, in principle, constitutes a good way to observe this effect by means of a phase measurement, to the first order in the gravitational potentials.

•Apr 1, 2016•0 citations
One of the most delicate problems in quantum optics is the proper description of the phase of a single-mode radiation field. One has first to devise an experimental scheme for phase measurement, thus giving an operational definition of phase, and afterwards search for the proper quantum-mechanical description of the experimental procedure. Several such schemes which differ distinctly in their experimental setup have already been proposed and even partly realized. In this paper, I will describe them in some detail and present the outlines of their theoretical analysis.>
An overview is given on experimental schemes for measuring phase properties (in particular, phase distributions) discussed and partly even realized thus far. It is pointed out that all of them amount to measuring the Q function for the field. Moreover, experimental procedures for determining the Wigner function for the field more or less directly are described which thus allow to assign experimental significance to the concept of area of overlap in phase space when applied to the quantum mechanical description of phase.
The experimental schemes for measuring quantum-mechanical phase properties of light suggested and partly also realized thus far, namely (i) amplification, with the help of a quantum amplifier, of the microscopic field before phase measurement, (ii) heterodyning the field with a strong local oscillator, and (iii) performing two separate homodyne measurements on the field after beam splitting, are compared from a theoretical point of view.They share the common feature that undesired noise enters the experimental setup, which makes the measurement fuzzy.It will be pointed out that all three schemes amount to measuring the Q function of the original field, and hence are fully equivalent.Since the Q function can be interpreted as a smoothed Wigner function, one may associate with the introduced noise a smoothing process in which intrinsically quantum-mechanical features displayed by finer details of the Wigner function -especially by the occurrence of negative values -are lost.As a consequence, the measured phase distribution will be broader than the "true" one based on the concept of a quantum-mechanical phase operator.In realistic experiments, the nonunit detection efficiency further deteriorates the measuring results.It will be shown that also this echect can be properly described by an (additional) smoothing process leading to a certain s-parametrized quasiprobability distribution, with a parameter s that is connected with the detection efficiency in a simple way, as the distribution that is actually measurable.
The correct description of the phase variable in quantum mechanics is a question rooted in its earliest formulations. The atom mechanics [1] of Bohr and Sommerfeld—the precursor of modern quantum mechanics—ascribes a central role to action-angle variables. However, Heisenberg's matrix mechanics and Schrödinger's wave mechanics are formulated [2] in terms of the canonical variables representing cartesian coordinates and momenta. Stimulated by this work London [3] attempted a reformulation of these theories in the previously favored action-angle variables. However, this attempt failed due to the difficulty in ascribing quantum operators to the angle variables of classical theory. Despite these difficulties London found [4] an operator representation of the complex exponential of these angle variables. The quantum phase of light made its first appearance in Dirac's classic paper [5] on the quantization of the radiation field. In contrast to modern methods, he constructed the annihilation and creation operators for each field mode from the corresponding amplitude and phase operators. Phase and its quantum nature acquired new significance with the development of lasers in the early sixties: theoretical investigations highlighted significant problems with Dirac's original proposal for the phase operator. A particularly elegant illustration of the difficulty was given by Louisell [6] in 1963. The advent of phase sensitive quantum noise as demonstrated experimentally in the production and detection of squeezed light [7] has created a new wave of interest in the nature of quantum optical phase leading to the discovery of the hermitian optical phase operator [8]. There has followed an explosion of theoretical activity in this area stimulating fresh experimental investigations. In preparing this special issue we have attempted to present the current state of this active and rapidly moving field. We have arranged the papers into what we hope is a coherent representation of the field. The first papers give a historical perspective and overview of current thinking. The two recent experimental investigations which follow are intimately connected to the phase space description of quantum mechanics based on quasi-probability distributions. The representa tion of phase via phase space and its connection with phase-dependent measurements and the phase operator are addressed in the next section. Some more formal considerations pertinent to phase are presented in the following section. Gravitational wave detection and optical communication have motivated the study of the limits of phase noise. Some recent investigations on such optimal phase states are presented. The issue concludes with two papers discussing the significance of phase in light-matter interactions. In concluding we express our gratitude to the authors of the papers in this volume for their efforts in preparing their high quality presentations.
The focus of this work is discussing the realization of space based experiments testing quantum mechanics, specifically quantum optics. The main experimental work is the practical realization of the earthbound part of a possible interferometric experiment that can be realized with a delayed-choice operational mode. The full Earth-satellite realization of this experimental scheme could set a new record on the distance to which delayed-choice schemes have been experimentally realized. General relativistic effects on Earth-satellite experiments is also discussed, in the case of two different setups. One of those is essentially the ground-space implementation of the interferometer realized in the laboratory, while the other represents a different possibility that could in principle measure gravitational redshift to single photons to greater extent. Which-path behavior and interference were observed to a very good degree on the interferometer realized in the lab. Specifically, the assessment of interference visibility, which was done after careful alignement of the setup, yields a value of approximately 95%, and a comparable value of approx 93% was obtained with an alternative setup which was also experimentally realized in the laboratory. As far as theoretical computations are concerned, a good formalism to deal with space-based interferometric measurements was pointed out, which allows to take into account both special relativistic contributes and general relativistic corrections to the amplitude describing the photons involved with this kind of experiments. Two different setups, which are candidates for the measurement of single photon gravitational redshift, were analyzed with this formalism. The setup with one interferometer on the ground and the other on the satellite, in principle, constitutes a good way to observe this effect by means of a phase measurement, to the first order in the gravitational potentials.