Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Excitation Spectrum for Weakly Interacting Bose Gas and the Liquid Structure Function of Helium

A. Bhattacharyya, Chia-Wei Woo

Published Jan 1, 1974• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4684-7864-8_11

Related papers

Quantum Monte Carlo study of dynamics : from weakly interacting Bose gas to helium-like Bose fluid

F. Tramonto, R. Rota, Davide Emilio Galli +1 more

•Sep 25, 2013•0 citations

The Excitation Spectrum for Bose Fluids with Weak Interactions

Robert Seiringer

Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung•Feb 19, 2014•0 citations

Nonanalytic Elementary Excitation Spectrum at Long Wavelengths in a Bose Gas and Liquid He4

Harvey Gould, Victor K. Wong

A rigorous microscopic analysis of a weakly interacting Bose gas at zero temperature shows that the elementary excitation spectrum $\ensuremath{\omega}(k)$ is not an analytic function of the wave vector $k$ in the long-wavelength limit but has the form $k[{c}_{0}+{c}_{2}{k}^{2}+{c}_{L4}{k}^{4}\mathrm{ln}(\frac{1}{k})+\ensuremath{\cdots}]$. It is pointed out that the structure factor $S(k)$ is not an analytic function of $k$ and that the specific heat ${C}_{v}(T)$ at low temperatures $T$ has the form ${C}_{v}={T}^{3}[{C}_{0}+{C}_{2}{T}^{2}+{C}_{L4}{T}^{4}\mathrm{ln}(\frac{1}{T})+\ensuremath{\cdots}]$. The extension of these results to liquid ${\mathrm{He}}^{4}$ is discussed.

Physical Review Letters•Aug 9, 1971•16 citations

Diagrammatic Analysis of the Method of Correlated Basis Functions. III. Excitation Spectrum of a Weakly Interacting Bose Gas

Archana Bhattacharyya, Chia-Wei Woo

In the continuing effort to establish contacts between the method of correlated basis functions (CBF) and the diagrammatic perturbation theory, we carry out parallel calculations of the excitation spectrum of a weakly interacting Bose gas. The Hugenholtz---Pines (HP) theory is first used to obtain the exact liquid-structure function and the energy spectrum, each to three orders in the strength parameter $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ that characterizes the interaction between a pair of particles in the system. Next we construct sets of CBF using three different correlating factors, and in each case calculate the excitation energy of the system. The results are compared to those obtained from the HP theory. Complete agreement is found to all orders considered. In conjunction with a paper to follow, the analysis demonstrates the flexibility of the CBF method and the relative ease of application in comparison to other methods.

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1973•10 citations

DENSITY EXCITATIONS OF WEAKLY INTERACTING BOSE GAS

Jürgen Bosse, Thomas Schlieter

International Conference on Path Integrals•Nov 1, 2008•0 citations

The role of pair correlations in the formation of the ground state and the elementary excitation spectrum in a superfluid Bose liquid (A Review)

Ernst A. Pashitskii

The paradoxes and disparities in the contemporary microscopic theory of superfluid helium (He–II) are discussed along with possible ways of resolving them by taking pair correlations of He4 atoms into consideration. It is shown that most paradoxes are associated with the commonly accepted initial assumption concerning the dominating role of single-particle Bose condensate (SPBC) in the quantum microstructure of the superfluid component ρs. The existence of intensive SPBC leads to a strong hybridization of the elementary excitation branches and to a common dispersion law for all boson branches, which is identified with the quasiparticle spectrum E(p) observed experimentally from slow neutron scattering in liquid helium. However, the stability of this spectrum during a transition through the λ-point and the large value of the gap in the vicinity of the “rotonic” minimum contradict both the Landau theoretical criterion of superfluidity and the small value of experimentally measured critical velocity. At the same time, a strong interaction between particles in the Bose liquid He4 strongly suppresses the SPBC which amounts to less than 1% of all He4 atoms and hence cannot be the main constituent of the superfluid component, unlike the case of a weakly nonideal Bose gas. Moreover, for a quite strong attraction between particles in a certain region of the momentum space, bound pairs of bosons can be formed in the superfluid Bose liquid, and a coherent pair condensate (CPC) analogous to the Cooper pair condensate in superconductors may appear. Such a strong CPC may completely suppress the weak SPBC. In this case, the one-particle spectrum ε(p) of elementary excitations does not hybridize with the collective (two-particle) spectrum and does not appear in the structure of the dynamic form factor S(p,ε), i.e., does not coincide with the spectrum measured from neutron scattering. The dispersion of one-particle spectrum is defined by the momentum dependence of the pair order parameter Ψ̃(p) and may have a minimum or a point of inflection at p≠0. This peculiarity in the one-particle spectrum of a Bose liquid with CPC but without SPBC vanishes together with Ψ̃(p) at the temperature Tc=Tλ of the phase transition from the superfluid to the normal state (unlike the rotonic minimum in the collective spectrum), while the corresponding critical velocity vc=min[ε(p)/p] vanishes at the λ-point in accordance with the Landau criterion and the experimental data. The assumption that the strong “Cooper-like” CPC is responsible for the quantum structure of the superfluid component ρs is confirmed indirectly by the successful application of the Justrow approximation (based on strong pair correlations) for describing the properties of liquid He4 and quantum liquid mixtures He3–4He on one hand, and by an anomalously large effective mass of He3 impurity atoms in He4, which is approximately equal to total mass of He3 and He4 atoms, thus pointing to the existence of helium atoms in superfluid liquid He–II. The value of the superfluid velocity circulation quantum in the Onsager–Feynman vortices in a Bose liquid with CPC but without SPBC is discussed as well as the critical velocities of superfluid He4 in ultrathin films and channels in which the creation and motion of quantum vortices are ruled out, and the quasiparticle spectrum undergoes dimensional quantization.

Low Temperature Physics•Feb 1, 1999•14 citations
A rigorous microscopic analysis of a weakly interacting Bose gas at zero temperature shows that the elementary excitation spectrum $\ensuremath{\omega}(k)$ is not an analytic function of the wave vector kkk in the long-wavelength limit but has the form $k[{c}_{0}+{c}_{2}{k}^{2}+{c}_{L4}{k}^{4}\mathrm{ln}(\frac{1}{k})+\ensuremath{\cdots}]$. It is pointed out that the structure factor S(k)S(k)S(k) is not an analytic function of kkk and that the specific heat Cv(T){C}_{v}(T)Cv​(T) at low temperatures TTT has the form ${C}_{v}={T}^{3}[{C}_{0}+{C}_{2}{T}^{2}+{C}_{L4}{T}^{4}\mathrm{ln}(\frac{1}{T})+\ensuremath{\cdots}]$. The extension of these results to liquid He4{\mathrm{He}}^{4}He4 is discussed.
In the continuing effort to establish contacts between the method of correlated basis functions (CBF) and the diagrammatic perturbation theory, we carry out parallel calculations of the excitation spectrum of a weakly interacting Bose gas. The Hugenholtz---Pines (HP) theory is first used to obtain the exact liquid-structure function and the energy spectrum, each to three orders in the strength parameter $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ that characterizes the interaction between a pair of particles in the system. Next we construct sets of CBF using three different correlating factors, and in each case calculate the excitation energy of the system. The results are compared to those obtained from the HP theory. Complete agreement is found to all orders considered. In conjunction with a paper to follow, the analysis demonstrates the flexibility of the CBF method and the relative ease of application in comparison to other methods.
The paradoxes and disparities in the contemporary microscopic theory of superfluid helium (He–II) are discussed along with possible ways of resolving them by taking pair correlations of He4 atoms into consideration. It is shown that most paradoxes are associated with the commonly accepted initial assumption concerning the dominating role of single-particle Bose condensate (SPBC) in the quantum microstructure of the superfluid component ρs. The existence of intensive SPBC leads to a strong hybridization of the elementary excitation branches and to a common dispersion law for all boson branches, which is identified with the quasiparticle spectrum E(p) observed experimentally from slow neutron scattering in liquid helium. However, the stability of this spectrum during a transition through the λ-point and the large value of the gap in the vicinity of the “rotonic” minimum contradict both the Landau theoretical criterion of superfluidity and the small value of experimentally measured critical velocity. At the same time, a strong interaction between particles in the Bose liquid He4 strongly suppresses the SPBC which amounts to less than 1% of all He4 atoms and hence cannot be the main constituent of the superfluid component, unlike the case of a weakly nonideal Bose gas. Moreover, for a quite strong attraction between particles in a certain region of the momentum space, bound pairs of bosons can be formed in the superfluid Bose liquid, and a coherent pair condensate (CPC) analogous to the Cooper pair condensate in superconductors may appear. Such a strong CPC may completely suppress the weak SPBC. In this case, the one-particle spectrum ε(p) of elementary excitations does not hybridize with the collective (two-particle) spectrum and does not appear in the structure of the dynamic form factor S(p,ε), i.e., does not coincide with the spectrum measured from neutron scattering. The dispersion of one-particle spectrum is defined by the momentum dependence of the pair order parameter Ψ̃(p) and may have a minimum or a point of inflection at p≠0. This peculiarity in the one-particle spectrum of a Bose liquid with CPC but without SPBC vanishes together with Ψ̃(p) at the temperature Tc=Tλ of the phase transition from the superfluid to the normal state (unlike the rotonic minimum in the collective spectrum), while the corresponding critical velocity vc=min[ε(p)/p] vanishes at the λ-point in accordance with the Landau criterion and the experimental data. The assumption that the strong “Cooper-like” CPC is responsible for the quantum structure of the superfluid component ρs is confirmed indirectly by the successful application of the Justrow approximation (based on strong pair correlations) for describing the properties of liquid He4 and quantum liquid mixtures He3–4He on one hand, and by an anomalously large effective mass of He3 impurity atoms in He4, which is approximately equal to total mass of He3 and He4 atoms, thus pointing to the existence of helium atoms in superfluid liquid He–II. The value of the superfluid velocity circulation quantum in the Onsager–Feynman vortices in a Bose liquid with CPC but without SPBC is discussed as well as the critical velocities of superfluid He4 in ultrathin films and channels in which the creation and motion of quantum vortices are ruled out, and the quasiparticle spectrum undergoes dimensional quantization.