Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications

Theory of open systems

L. A. Lugiato

Published Jan 1, 1976• 6 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0378-4371(76)90089-3

Related papers

Theory of open systems I

Luigi A. Lugiato

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Jan 1, 1975•184 citations

The Open Systems View in Field Theory

Rivat Sébastien, Hartmann Stephan

Cuffaro and Hartmann have recently provided an extensive defense of the open systems view, according to which physical systems are best treated as fundamentally open, by arguing, in particular, that quantum systems should in general be taken to evolve non-unitarily over time. For all its merits, this defense faces one central limitation: little is known about the structure of non-unitary dynamics in the case of our best current theories. Yet there is cause for optimism: the standard effective field theory (EFT) framework, in which our best current theories are widely believed to be more reliably formulated, has been successfully generalized to an open EFT framework during the last decades. This paper defends the open systems view in the open EFT setting. We argue that the bottom-up open EFT framework, in which effective systems are treated as fundamentally open, is both more fundamental and more epistemically reliable than its top-down counterpart, in which effective systems are treated as derivatively open.

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

The Open Systems View in Field Theory

Sébastien Rivat, Stephan Hartmann

Cuffaro and Hartmann have recently provided an extensive defense of the open systems view, according to which physical systems are best treated as fundamentally open, by arguing, in particular, that quantum systems should in general be taken to evolve non-unitarily over time. For all its merits, this defense faces one central limitation: little is known about the structure of non-unitary dynamics in the case of our best current theories. Yet there is cause for optimism: the standard effective field theory (EFT) framework, in which our best current theories are widely believed to be more reliably formulated, has been successfully generalized to an open EFT framework during the last decades. This paper defends the open systems view in the open EFT setting. We argue that the bottom-up open EFT framework, in which effective systems are treated as fundamentally open, is both more fundamental and more epistemically reliable than its top-down counterpart, in which effective systems are treated as derivatively open.

Philosophy of Physics•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Statistical Theory of Open Systems

Yu. L. Klimontovich

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1995•392 citations

Renormalization in Open Quantum Field theory I: Scalar field theory

Avinash, Chandan Jana, R. Loganayagam +1 more

While the notion of open quantum systems is itself old, most of the existing studies deal with quantum mechanical systems rather than quantum field theories. After a brief review of field theoretical/path integral tools currently available to deal with open quantum field theories, we go on to apply these tools to an open version of $ϕ^3$ + $ϕ^4$ theory in four spacetime dimensions and demonstrate its one loop renormalizability (including the renormalizability of the Lindblad structure).

arXiv:1704.08335•Apr 26, 2017•7 citations

Statistical theory of open systems

I︠u︡. L. Klimontovich

•Jan 1, 1967•84 citations
Cuffaro and Hartmann have recently provided an extensive defense of the open systems view, according to which physical systems are best treated as fundamentally open, by arguing, in particular, that quantum systems should in general be taken to evolve non-unitarily over time. For all its merits, this defense faces one central limitation: little is known about the structure of non-unitary dynamics in the case of our best current theories. Yet there is cause for optimism: the standard effective field theory (EFT) framework, in which our best current theories are widely believed to be more reliably formulated, has been successfully generalized to an open EFT framework during the last decades. This paper defends the open systems view in the open EFT setting. We argue that the bottom-up open EFT framework, in which effective systems are treated as fundamentally open, is both more fundamental and more epistemically reliable than its top-down counterpart, in which effective systems are treated as derivatively open.
Cuffaro and Hartmann have recently provided an extensive defense of the open systems view, according to which physical systems are best treated as fundamentally open, by arguing, in particular, that quantum systems should in general be taken to evolve non-unitarily over time. For all its merits, this defense faces one central limitation: little is known about the structure of non-unitary dynamics in the case of our best current theories. Yet there is cause for optimism: the standard effective field theory (EFT) framework, in which our best current theories are widely believed to be more reliably formulated, has been successfully generalized to an open EFT framework during the last decades. This paper defends the open systems view in the open EFT setting. We argue that the bottom-up open EFT framework, in which effective systems are treated as fundamentally open, is both more fundamental and more epistemically reliable than its top-down counterpart, in which effective systems are treated as derivatively open.
While the notion of open quantum systems is itself old, most of the existing studies deal with quantum mechanical systems rather than quantum field theories. After a brief review of field theoretical/path integral tools currently available to deal with open quantum field theories, we go on to apply these tools to an open version of ϕ3ϕ^3ϕ3 + ϕ4ϕ^4ϕ4 theory in four spacetime dimensions and demonstrate its one loop renormalizability (including the renormalizability of the Lindblad structure).