Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

Graph Embedding Using Quantum Commute Times

David Emms, Richard C. Wilson, Edwin R. Hancock

Published Aug 20, 2007• 25 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-540-72903-7_34

Related papers

Quantum Graphs and Optimization

Sovan Samanta

Studies in computational intelligence•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Graph drawing using quantum commute time

David Emms, Edwin R. Hancock, Richard C. Wilson

In this paper, we explore experimentally the use of the commute time of the continuous-time quantum walk for graph drawing. For the classical random walk, the commute time has been shown to be robust to errors in edge weight structure and to lead to spectral clustering algorithms with improved performance. We analyse the quantum commute times with reference to their classical counterpart. Specifically, we explore the graph embeddings that preserve commute-time.

Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition•Dec 1, 2008•1 citation

ATOM: An Efficient Topology Adaptive Algorithm for Minor Embedding in Quantum Computing

Hoang M. Ngo, Tamer Kahveci, My T. Thai

Quantum annealing (QA) has emerged as a powerful technique to solve optimization problems by taking advantages of quantum physics. In QA process, a bottleneck that may prevent QA to scale up is minor embedding step in which we embed optimization problems represented by a graph, called logical graph, to Quantum Processing Unit (QPU) topology of quantum computers, represented by another graph, call hardware graph. Existing methods for minor embedding require a significant amount of running time in a large-scale graph embedding. To overcome this problem, in this paper, we introduce a novel notion of adaptive topology which is an expandable sub graph of the hardware graph. From that, we develop a minor embedding algorithm, namely Adaptive TOpology eMbedding (ATOM). ATOM iteratively selects a node from the logical graph, and embeds it to the adaptive topology of the hardware graph. Our experimental results show that ATOM is able to provide a feasible embedding in much smaller running time than that of the state-of-the-art without compromising the quality of resulting embedding. 1

arXiv:2307.01843•International Conference on Communications•May 28, 2023•4 citations

Quantum graphs

Theoretical and mathematical physics•Sep 22, 2008•0 citations

On a Tracial Version of Haemers Bound

Li Gao, Sander Gribling, Yinan Li

We extend upper bounds on the quantum independence number and the quantum Shannon capacity of graphs to their counterparts in the commuting operator model. We introduce a von Neumann algebraic generalization of the fractional Haemers bound (over$\mathbb {C}$) and prove that the generalization upper bounds the commuting quantum independence number. We call our bound the tracial Haemers bound, and we prove that it is multiplicative with respect to the strong product. In particular, this makes it an upper bound on the Shannon capacity. The tracial Haemers bound is incomparable with the Lovász theta function, another well-known upper bound on the Shannon capacity. We show that separating the tracial and fractional Haemers bounds would refute Connes’ embedding conjecture. Along the way, we prove that the tracial rank and tracial Haemers bound are elements of the (commuting quantum) asymptotic spectrum of graphs (Zuiddam, Combinatorica, 2019). We also show that the inertia bound (an upper bound on the quantum independence number) upper bounds the commuting quantum independence number.

arXiv:2107.02567•IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•May 23, 2022•1 citation

Quantum graphs

Peter Kuchment

Waves in Random Media•Jan 1, 2004•11 citations
Quantum annealing (QA) has emerged as a powerful technique to solve optimization problems by taking advantages of quantum physics. In QA process, a bottleneck that may prevent QA to scale up is minor embedding step in which we embed optimization problems represented by a graph, called logical graph, to Quantum Processing Unit (QPU) topology of quantum computers, represented by another graph, call hardware graph. Existing methods for minor embedding require a significant amount of running time in a large-scale graph embedding. To overcome this problem, in this paper, we introduce a novel notion of adaptive topology which is an expandable sub graph of the hardware graph. From that, we develop a minor embedding algorithm, namely Adaptive TOpology eMbedding (ATOM). ATOM iteratively selects a node from the logical graph, and embeds it to the adaptive topology of the hardware graph. Our experimental results show that ATOM is able to provide a feasible embedding in much smaller running time than that of the state-of-the-art without compromising the quality of resulting embedding. 1
We extend upper bounds on the quantum independence number and the quantum Shannon capacity of graphs to their counterparts in the commuting operator model. We introduce a von Neumann algebraic generalization of the fractional Haemers bound (overC\mathbb {C}C) and prove that the generalization upper bounds the commuting quantum independence number. We call our bound the tracial Haemers bound, and we prove that it is multiplicative with respect to the strong product. In particular, this makes it an upper bound on the Shannon capacity. The tracial Haemers bound is incomparable with the Lovász theta function, another well-known upper bound on the Shannon capacity. We show that separating the tracial and fractional Haemers bounds would refute Connes’ embedding conjecture. Along the way, we prove that the tracial rank and tracial Haemers bound are elements of the (commuting quantum) asymptotic spectrum of graphs (Zuiddam, Combinatorica, 2019). We also show that the inertia bound (an upper bound on the quantum independence number) upper bounds the commuting quantum independence number.